re: Imagine losing to Louisville

quote:

---

I mean if we’re just picking arbitrary timeframes, we’re 6-4 against them in football in the last decade.

---

Only 6 - 4 in Kentucky's best decade in football since the 1950's and Louisville's worst decade since the 1980s, not exactly great.

I wouldn't say my timeframe is arbitrary. College Football games prior to 1950 aren't particularly relevant to college football today. It was a far different sport in the early days.

I don't blame Louisville at all if they don't count those early games.

And if you want to be arbitrary, Louisville has won the last 2, 41-14 and 41-0, and that's really what matters. Under Jeff Brohm, Louisville seems to have the advantage. And Will Stein, while he may be good, is ultimately untested.

Ooof. Rebs in B1G trouble

quote:

---

I don't blame Louisville at all if they don't count those early games.

---

Of course you don’t.

quote:

---

And if you want to be arbitrary, Louisville has won the last 2, 41-14 and 41-0, and that's really what matters. Under Jeff Brohm, Louisville seems to have the advantage.

---

Interesting that you mentioned best/worst decades in your previous comment but then pick Stoops’ last two years before he was let go.

quote:

---

Interesting that you mentioned best/worst decades in your previous comment but then pick Stoops’ last two years before he was let go.

---

The last couple years are the only years that really matter in general. All time records really aren't that important.

I mean if you want to do it, it's 2 - 1 Louisville since Jeff Brohm became Louisville's head coach. That's a pretty objective view since the previous coaches now have no impact on Louisville's success.

In a dogfight with a cusa founding member

Lol