Started By
Message
re: What recruit are you most excited for in the 2014 class
Posted on 2/27/13 at 6:14 pm to MSfootball123
Posted on 2/27/13 at 6:14 pm to MSfootball123
Like you care?
You have 40 odd posts since you joined this site, 35 of them are in this thread.
You care and U mad.
GTFO.
You have 40 odd posts since you joined this site, 35 of them are in this thread.
You care and U mad.
GTFO.
1
Posted on 2/27/13 at 7:08 pm to TideSaint
"U mad" = i was wrong and you called me out
thanks TideSaint!!!
Posted on 2/28/13 at 9:45 am to MSfootball123
quote:
thanks TideSaint!!!
quote:
Stock Down: Tony Jefferson, Oklahoma
Oklahoma's Tony Jefferson is in a different situation than Banks, as his poor 40 time brings concerns about his range. Jefferson's play suggests that he gets by mainly with his athleticism and quickness. He has a tendency to take some poor angles and misread his keys.
This is why his 4.75 40 time is a red flag, as it increases his vulnerability for big plays.
LINK
You're welcome.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 10:23 am to MSfootball123
quote:
MSfootball123
Posted on 2/28/13 at 10:29 am to TideSaint
More like
Bama fans and MSU fans still arguing about stuff nobody else gives a shite about?
Bama fans and MSU fans still arguing about stuff nobody else gives a shite about?
Posted on 2/28/13 at 11:04 am to GenesChin
quote:
Bama fans and MSU fans still arguing about stuff nobody else gives a shite about?
He's an Oklahoma fan, dipshit. One of your brethren has been getting into it with him as well.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 1:00 am to GenesChin
quote:
More like
Bama fans and MSU fans still arguing about stuff nobody else gives a shite about?
Seriously. I don't even know why they are arguing. UGA has more than both, by a good margin.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 7:53 am to MSfootball123
quote:
MSfootball123
Uh oh...
quote:
Stewart, in 10 out of the last 12 years, Oklahoma has finished lower in the final polls than it was ranked in the preseason polls, the most of any FBS school. Is this because Oklahoma has been a constant underachiever, or have the expectations simply been too high?
My initial reaction upon receiving Mike's e-mail was to e-mail him back to ask where he found that stat. He pointed me to Chris Stassen's excellent compilation of preseason data, which I've used as a reference many times, but, I must reluctantly confess, did not realize included a very interesting table (going back to 1989) that shows frequently rated teams' annual performance relative to preseason expectations. Much to my surprise, Oklahoma checks in as the biggest underperformer of all. (Note that prior to it's unexpected BCS title berth last season, Notre Dame, a more expected choice, would have been the biggest underperformer.)
Let's see how much I "misunderstand" this one.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 8:50 am to MSfootball123
Msfootball123, what are your thoughts on OK DE Deandrea Clark ?
Posted on 3/1/13 at 9:08 am to memphisplaya
quote:
Msfootball123, what are your thoughts on OK DE Deandrea Clark ?
This should be fun.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 7:43 pm to Nicolae
quote:
the locks i know of-
Marlon Humphrey
Da'Shawn Hand
Lorenzo Carter
Bo Scarbrough
Cameron Robinson
David Cornwell
:rotflmao: :rotflmao:Posted on 3/1/13 at 9:18 pm to memphisplaya
My thoughts on Deondre Clark?
Arguably the best prospect in Oklahoma this year, grew up a LSU fan and wants to play OOS. Looking at TAMU, LSU, and Okie St(his brother plays basketball there)
IMO he's a LSU lock and will be solid in the Tiger defense.
Posted on 3/1/13 at 9:25 pm to TideSaint
quote:
quote:Stewart, in 10 out of the last 12 years, Oklahoma has finished lower in the final polls than it was ranked in the preseason polls, the most of any FBS school. Is this because Oklahoma has been a constant underachiever, or have the expectations simply been too high? My initial reaction upon receiving Mike's e-mail was to e-mail him back to ask where he found that stat. He pointed me to Chris Stassen's excellent compilation of preseason data, which I've used as a reference many times, but, I must reluctantly confess, did not realize included a very interesting table (going back to 1989) that shows frequently rated teams' annual performance relative to preseason expectations. Much to my surprise, Oklahoma checks in as the biggest underperformer of all. (Note that prior to it's unexpected BCS title berth last season, Notre Dame, a more expected choice, would have been the biggest underperformer.) Let's see how much I "misunderstand" this one.
OU is the most winningest footall team in the modern era dumbass
OU overrated?
OU has the best win percentage and most wins then any other college football program post World War 2....
Bob Stoops era alone..
800+ win percentage
Only 2 seasons with less than 10 wins
4 National Championship appearances (won 2000)
8 Conference Championships
2 Heisman winners (4 finalists)
Bob Stoops is 2-0 vs your beloved Crimson Tide in the BCS era.
Where was BAMA from 1993-2008?
Posted on 3/1/13 at 9:33 pm to MSfootball123
Total wins
OU 587
BAMA 531
Weeks Ranked AP Poll
No. 1 Top 5
OU 101 383
UA 57 309
Winning Percentage
OU .76285
UA .70195
Consensus All-Americans
OU 74
UA 46
National Championships
OU 7
UA 10
All-time series record OU vs BAMA
OU leads 2-1
OU 587
BAMA 531
Weeks Ranked AP Poll
No. 1 Top 5
OU 101 383
UA 57 309
Winning Percentage
OU .76285
UA .70195
Consensus All-Americans
OU 74
UA 46
National Championships
OU 7
UA 10
All-time series record OU vs BAMA
OU leads 2-1
Posted on 3/1/13 at 9:54 pm to MSfootball123
Thanks. 
Posted on 3/2/13 at 9:30 am to MSfootball123
Most Winningest huh? Who's the dumbass?
& from 93 to 08 Bama won as many NCs as OU did with arguably one of the greatest defenses to ever take a field in CFB (& yes I noticed you made the cutoff yr 93 to exclude Bama's NC but it was played in 93, so try again dumbass)
So even in one of the darkest times for Bama football (in between the Bear and Saban, also a team ravaged with sanctions, which is the victories Stoops can claim, again AGAINST MIKE SHULA) we still have the same level of success, that must sting huh?
& from 93 to 08 Bama won as many NCs as OU did with arguably one of the greatest defenses to ever take a field in CFB (& yes I noticed you made the cutoff yr 93 to exclude Bama's NC but it was played in 93, so try again dumbass)
So even in one of the darkest times for Bama football (in between the Bear and Saban, also a team ravaged with sanctions, which is the victories Stoops can claim, again AGAINST MIKE SHULA) we still have the same level of success, that must sting huh?
This post was edited on 3/2/13 at 9:31 am
Posted on 3/2/13 at 10:12 am to MSfootball123
quote:
OU is the most winningest footall team in the modern era dumbass
How does that make what Tide posted wrong?
Posted on 3/2/13 at 3:15 pm to BuccWildBammer
Switzer and Bud Wilkinson's OU teams would have mopped the floor with BAMA
OU had sanctions and still went to the BCS game in 2008, what's your point?
OU had sanctions and still went to the BCS game in 2008, what's your point?
Posted on 3/2/13 at 3:16 pm to MSfootball123
BAMA could win the next 10 National Championships...
and Stoops will still be undefeated against BAMA. Deal with it
and Stoops will still be undefeated against BAMA. Deal with it
Posted on 3/2/13 at 4:12 pm to MSfootball123
quote:
BAMA could win the next 10 National Championships...
and Stoops will still be undefeated against BAMA. Deal with it
How are the two mutually exclusive? Alabama could play Oklahomo for the next 10 national championships and win everyone of them, like you said. Bob Stoops wouldn't be undefeated against Alabama then. Unless, of course, you're admitting to Oklahoma being a garbage football program and not making a single one of those national championship games. You wouldn't be wrong. Just don't resort to logical fallacies the next time you get bum-rushed.
This post was edited on 3/2/13 at 4:13 pm
Page 16 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News