Started By
Message
On3's top classes at each position in the 2022 cycle
Posted on 2/2/22 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 2/2/22 at 9:48 pm
LINK
Quarterback – Penn State
Honorable mention Ohio State
Running Back – Penn State
Honorable Mention: Alabama, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State
Wide Receiver – Alabama
Honorable Mention: Texas A&M, Tennessee, Clemson, TCU
Tight End – Alabama
Honorable Mention: Notre Dame, Texas A&M
Offensive Line – Texas
Honorable Mention: Notre Dame
Defensive Line – Texas A&M
Honorable Mention: Georgia and Alabama.
EDGE – Alabama
Honorable Mention: Tennessee, Stanford, Georgia
Linebacker – Ohio State
Honorable Mention: Notre Dame
Defensive Back – Georgia
Honorable Mention: Clemson, Texas, Oregon, Michigan
Quarterback – Penn State
Honorable mention Ohio State
Running Back – Penn State
Honorable Mention: Alabama, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State
Wide Receiver – Alabama
Honorable Mention: Texas A&M, Tennessee, Clemson, TCU
Tight End – Alabama
Honorable Mention: Notre Dame, Texas A&M
Offensive Line – Texas
Honorable Mention: Notre Dame
Defensive Line – Texas A&M
Honorable Mention: Georgia and Alabama.
EDGE – Alabama
Honorable Mention: Tennessee, Stanford, Georgia
Linebacker – Ohio State
Honorable Mention: Notre Dame
Defensive Back – Georgia
Honorable Mention: Clemson, Texas, Oregon, Michigan
3
Posted on 2/2/22 at 10:25 pm to jatebe
Guess everyone else is going to have to grind a little harder next year, 
Posted on 2/2/22 at 10:37 pm to jatebe
Weird A&M landed two WRs rated higher than any of Bama’s.
Even weirder A&M and Bama both had 3 TEs. A&M’s top TE is rated higher than Bama’s top TE. 2nd TE rated higher than Bama’s 2nd. And 3rd TE over Bama’s 3rd TE.
Also, A&M easily has a top 5 DB group too. National #20, 31, 58, 83, 122, 232, & 353. Probably top 2 or 3.
Even weirder A&M and Bama both had 3 TEs. A&M’s top TE is rated higher than Bama’s top TE. 2nd TE rated higher than Bama’s 2nd. And 3rd TE over Bama’s 3rd TE.
Also, A&M easily has a top 5 DB group too. National #20, 31, 58, 83, 122, 232, & 353. Probably top 2 or 3.
This post was edited on 2/2/22 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 2/2/22 at 10:50 pm to Farmer1906
*looks who wrote the article*
Charles got his start in the business covering Alabama recruiting for BamaOnline.
There’s zero argument using their own rankings for Bama over A&M at tight end, unless it’s just personal opinion.
Charles got his start in the business covering Alabama recruiting for BamaOnline.
There’s zero argument using their own rankings for Bama over A&M at tight end, unless it’s just personal opinion.
This post was edited on 2/2/22 at 10:52 pm
Posted on 2/2/22 at 10:50 pm to Farmer1906
Yep, list is..........wait
Posted on 2/3/22 at 3:36 am to DawgRff
Entire article is shite
Posted on 2/3/22 at 6:22 am to Farmer1906
It’s ok, it’s one recruiting services opinion. And your rankings are wrong
This post was edited on 2/3/22 at 6:32 am
Posted on 2/3/22 at 9:25 am to FishFearMe
quote:I would argue that On3 is shite
Entire article is shite
Posted on 2/3/22 at 12:26 pm to ColoradoAg
So On3, rivals, and ESPN all suck?? 
All biased against Aggie lol
All biased against Aggie lol
This post was edited on 2/3/22 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 2/5/22 at 8:36 am to jatebe
That list is laughable. A&M destroyed everyone at DL, and TE
Posted on 2/5/22 at 8:37 am to Dawgsontop34
quote:
Charles got his start in the business covering Alabama recruiting for BamaOnline.
Shocking
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News