Started By
Message
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:00 pm to NIH
quote:
Rough Ryder
Buy 2 get a free sample of Horny Goat Weed
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:04 pm to Klongdawg
quote:
please do, after our Dak4Heisman14 campaign we may soar on past that 15 spot.
You're a damn hoot.

This post was edited on 2/6/14 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:06 pm to RebFeBrees
He's engie and Coach's brother
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:07 pm to SwayzeBalla
calls Bundy to hang out
gets the button
gets the button
Posted on 2/7/14 at 9:35 am to sorantable
quote:
You know what's kind of funny? I just looked at 247's team rankings for 2015 and State is ranked 15th. 5 spots ahead of Ole Miss. I thought you guys were killing it. Weird.
Saved for hilarity potential of this comment after our JR day tomorrow...
Posted on 2/7/14 at 12:16 pm to engie
quote:
engie
I'm still waiting on you to throw up some stats to prove how much better of a passer Dak is than Bo.
and no stats that include rushing yards. You tried that already. Rushing yards =/= passing yards.....you should know this if you watch the sport, at all.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 12:26 pm to pankReb
Ole Miss recruiting > State recruiting. State only got THREE 4stars. Can't win in the sec with that garbage.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 12:30 pm to engie
It's even more hilarious that you would put stock in your "ranking" a full year ahead of time, knowing we will take who and what we want and finish ranked much better...
Posted on 2/7/14 at 12:32 pm to hehatedrew
quote:
It's even more hilarious that you would put stock in your "ranking" a full year ahead of time, knowing we will take who and what we want and finish ranked much better...
and then, once again, claim that recruiting rankings don't matter.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 12:36 pm to pankReb
But saves posts involving them having a " good" ranking...
Posted on 2/7/14 at 1:16 pm to hehatedrew
quote:
knowing we will take who and what we want and finish ranked much better...

how often does that happen in State strongholds? If Mullen lets that happen he deserves to be fired.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 1:17 pm to hehatedrew
State's boosters have it all wrong... They line these kids' pockets at junior day to make them "MSU leans"... frick. That.
Do it the same February that they actually sign their LOI if you want them to land in Starkville... It does you no good to pay them an entire year before NSD.

Do it the same February that they actually sign their LOI if you want them to land in Starkville... It does you no good to pay them an entire year before NSD.

This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 2/7/14 at 1:21 pm to reggierayreb
Bundy's All DAWG Booster Club is going to get us who we want.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 1:28 pm to hehatedrew
quote:
It's even more hilarious that you would put stock in your "ranking" a full year ahead of time, knowing we will take who and what we want and finish ranked much better...
I'm not the one putting "stock" in anything.
I'm the one enjoying the cycle of Ole Miss fandom which peaks in February and bottoms out in November.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 1:35 pm to pankReb
quote:
I'm still waiting on you to throw up some stats to prove how much better of a passer Dak is than Bo.
quote:
and no stats that include rushing yards. You tried that already. Rushing yards =/= passing yards.....you should know this if you watch the sport, at all.
Your obsession with one statistical split is hilarious. Glad you found one that Bo was "better" at than the guy that got his first career start this year in an offense that had been molded away from his strengths and had a receiving corps that entered the year with ONE total start among the group.
Our QB scores more, puts up more yards per play, is more efficient overall, and is well on his way to being a superior passer. Hilarious that Dak took everything else from you already. And will take that one next year as well.
This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 2/7/14 at 1:37 pm to pankReb
quote:
and then, once again, claim that recruiting rankings don't matter.
I'm not really getting into this whole debate but I literally just saw you post the opposite of this in another thread.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 1:40 pm to engie
I'm not the one that brought it up. I just merely pointed out relevant statistics to an argument.
You're the one that tried to disprove it........miserably.
welcome to the party. We had to mold our offense away from the long-ball because of Bo rehabbing his arm. But that doesn't fit your weak argument so throw it out....right?
You're the one that tried to disprove it........miserably.
quote:
an offense that had been molded away from his strengths
welcome to the party. We had to mold our offense away from the long-ball because of Bo rehabbing his arm. But that doesn't fit your weak argument so throw it out....right?
Posted on 2/7/14 at 1:41 pm to DynastyDawg
quote:
I'm not really getting into this whole debate but I literally just saw you post the opposite of this in another thread.
shut your whore mouth.

Popular
Back to top
