Started By
Message
LOL @ Aaron Sterling rated a 3*
Posted on 2/17/16 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 2/17/16 at 4:49 pm
According to 247 (even in their latest update having seen most Junior film), this guy is a 3* (#610 or so overall). I don't care if he's 6'1" or 6'5", 24 sacks, a ton of TFL, with elite explosiveness deserves to be MUCH higher ranked than this. DL film doesn't get much better than this. Committed to Bama, so I'm sure he'll get the bump eventually. 
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 2/17/16 at 4:51 pm
9
Posted on 2/17/16 at 5:08 pm to Bama3714
Alabama fan complaining about star rating. That's precious.
This post was edited on 2/17/16 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 2/17/16 at 5:12 pm to Bama3714
Preach it!
Posted on 2/17/16 at 5:21 pm to Bama3714
He'll be a 4* in a few months
Posted on 2/17/16 at 5:25 pm to AA7
He is vastly underrated.
However, as long as he sticks with Alabama I don't care what his ranking is.
Kid's a fricking beast.
However, as long as he sticks with Alabama I don't care what his ranking is.
Kid's a fricking beast.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 5:40 pm to brlsu1988
Who cares who he's committed to? Bama bump is fine with me. But what matters is that film. He's an absolute monster. Hopefully we can keep him with Kirby at Uga now.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 6:35 pm to Bama3714
Dude will be a 5 star by signing day 2017 anyway so why the frick are you complaining again?
Posted on 2/17/16 at 6:50 pm to Bama3714
Didn't sci Martin get like 30+ sacks his Sr year? Justify his ranking
Posted on 2/17/16 at 7:50 pm to Bama3714
The bust rate of Stephenson HS players isn't doing him any favors
Posted on 2/17/16 at 10:07 pm to Bama3714
#1 player in the country in January of next year.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 10:07 pm to lsusportsman2
Okay. We shouldn't say anything. We should just remain quiet and not comment in the recruiting board. Thanks for all that you bring to this board.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 10:08 pm to bugafor6
Martin is a terrific pass rushing specialist. Should be a 4*, IMO. I will say, though, that being so light makes it tough to project Martin. At 6'1"+ 270, Sterling looks elite to me. And unlike Martin, is very good against the run.
This post was edited on 2/17/16 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 2/18/16 at 6:39 am to Bama3714
I would say that the fact the Sterling is already 270 at a listed 6'1" is a concern. You have to worry about how much weight his frame can hold.
Also, being a 3* doesn't mean he isn't or can't be a good player. Something like 2% of high school players are 3*s. It's nitpicking above that, and his size is clearly nitpick-able.
Also, being a 3* doesn't mean he isn't or can't be a good player. Something like 2% of high school players are 3*s. It's nitpicking above that, and his size is clearly nitpick-able.
Posted on 2/18/16 at 7:46 am to Bama3714
The fact that he plays on a recruited all star team and they played 8 nobodies might have had a little something to do with those stats.
Posted on 2/18/16 at 8:34 am to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
The fact that he plays on a recruited all star team and they played 8 nobodies might have had a little something to do with those stats.
Welcome to Georgia high school football.
Posted on 2/18/16 at 8:47 am to Prettyboy Floyd
Been here 15+ years 
but I get what you're saying.
but I get what you're saying.This post was edited on 2/18/16 at 8:48 am
Posted on 2/24/16 at 12:44 pm to Bama3714
If this is the case Sci Martin should be a 6*
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News