Started By
Message
re: As a recruit.. Texas or Texas A&M
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:45 pm to TreyAnastasio
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:45 pm to TreyAnastasio
So? Playing in the SEC is a huge selling point. WTF 

Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:46 pm to Patton
quote:we seem to be doing ok in this department
But a Dline or Lbers maybe UT
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:46 pm to Gradual_Stroke
I mean we literally flipped a LB who was committed to texas this past cycle
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:47 pm to WestCoastAg
BUTT frickING AUSTIN DUDE!!!!!!!!! JESUS CHRIST 6TH STREEET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WEEEEEEEEEEEE
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:49 pm to Gradual_Stroke
They have folk music festivals and bans on grocery bags brah. We can't compete with that and it shows in all the players we have with Texas offers
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:49 pm to WestCoastAg
Not saying you aren't. But Strong is a defensive minded coach and there seems to be more of a pedigree at UTex with Dline and LB.
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:49 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
I don't think y'all are getting it. Austin. Holy diarrhea-fricking shitcount. Austin y'all. Austin.
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:50 pm to Patton
quote:and that's doing absolute shite for them when it comes to head to head recruiting with us
But Strong is a defensive minded coach and there seems to be more of a pedigree at UTex with Dline and LB.
This post was edited on 4/4/14 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:50 pm to Gradual_Stroke
Some of y'all don't get how awesome an overcrowded city full of scrawny white hipsters is. Recruits love that shite.
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:55 pm to Gradual_Stroke
This is one of the more solid flame threads ive seen in awhile.



Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:56 pm to WestCoastAg
Well more power to Sumlin then

This post was edited on 4/4/14 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:58 pm to Patton
I mean I'm sorry if I came off as an a-hole but that's really the only way I can describe it right now
Strong comes to daylon macks school to visit him, daylon says thanks but I'm busy

Strong comes to daylon macks school to visit him, daylon says thanks but I'm busy
This post was edited on 4/4/14 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 4/4/14 at 2:59 pm to Greenfloridan
quote:
Texas Longhorns
I would fit in better at UT than TAMU. Their lifestyle is more to my liking.
This post was edited on 4/4/14 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 4/4/14 at 3:01 pm to Greenfloridan
A&M. They may be new but they're not a knockoff like that other school.
Posted on 4/4/14 at 3:02 pm to Gradual_Stroke
What are you talking about? The city argument logic is airtight. Based on that logic, the schools in the better cities are always going to be dominating recruiting battles, without fail...
Tulane/New Orleans > LSU/Baton Rouge
Miami/Miami > Florida/Gainesville
Vandy/Nashville > UT/Knoxville
SMU/Dallas > Oklahoma/Norman
Tulane/New Orleans > LSU/Baton Rouge
Miami/Miami > Florida/Gainesville
Vandy/Nashville > UT/Knoxville
SMU/Dallas > Oklahoma/Norman
Posted on 4/4/14 at 3:07 pm to Duckie
quote:
I would fit in better at UT than TAMU. Their lifestyle is more to my liking.
What are you doing on a football message board then?
You should be at an art festival or a GLBT pride parade (not that theres anything wrong with that).
Posted on 4/4/14 at 3:13 pm to MMB5DAP
Artsy ppl can be fans of football as well, and there are also Aton of ppl who love the Austin lifestyle and love football just as much.
Posted on 4/4/14 at 3:14 pm to WestCoastAg
If you ask a non biased college football fan from any part of the country they will probably tell you A&M has hotter women. And why would anyone want to live in Austin? It's nothing but hippies. I think most non biased people would also choose College Station over Austin. The SEC Rant is biased.
Popular
Back to top
