Started By
Message
re: Arkansas Signing Day Thread
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:07 pm to SunHog
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:07 pm to SunHog
quote:
Didn't help against LSU or Alabama when trying to win championships the past 2 years.
Brah just shut the frick up and go back to the OT. I don't give a shite what you think about football. You're a funny dude most of the time and one hell of a troll but i'm not in the mood.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:08 pm to SunHog
quote:
Out of all 14 SEC teams. 2008 - Bad --#11 2009 - Good --#7 2010 - Bad -- #12 2011 - Good --#9 2012- Bad --#12 According to Rivals ranked in the SEC.
Why don't you use the class re-ranking? You know, the actual results the field. Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't that #11 "bad" recruiting class ranked #6 after they actually played in college. Please explain that.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:08 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
that avi is hilarious.
Trevo's handiwork afaik.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:09 pm to SunHog
quote:
Didn't help against LSU or Alabama when trying to win championships the past 2 years.
Did you just sleep through the 2010 season? I could have SWORN we beat LSU. I could have SWORN we could have easily beaten Bama if not for 2 Mallett brain farts.
Answer me this, SunHog. What do you want us to do about these "lackluster" classes? Seriously. You keep bitching. What do you want done? Unless you've got a solution to this supposed problem, shut the frick up.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:10 pm to SunHog
quote:
2010 - 10-3
2011 - 11-2
2012 - 14-0
There, fify...
This post was edited on 2/1/12 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:16 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
You know what your data doesn't account for? coaching and player development. Until you find a better indicator than wins/losses, I dont' give a frick what rivals thinks.
Wins and loses are the indicator because it's the league we play in and teams we recruit against.
quote:
Go look at Auburn's recruiting rankings. Texas'. A&M. Etc, etc. Just because you have a highly ranked class doesn't guarantee you success.
Auburn's recruiting won them a National Champion recruiting a top 5 classes.
quote:This should be obvious with FSU.
Just because you have a highly ranked class doesn't guarantee you success.
Auburn In the SEC
2008 #6
2009 #9
2010 #2
2011 #4
2012 #3
They have a SEC Championship and National Championship in the same league and same division.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:19 pm to SunHog
quote:
They have a SEC Championship and National Championship in the same league and same division.
Because of Cam Newton, who had likely the most impressive season in recent college football history. They dont' have another guy like that. He, literally, carried them to a national title on his back.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:21 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Brah just shut the frick up and go back to the OT. I don't give a shite what you think about football. You're a funny dude most of the time and one hell of a troll but i'm not in the mood.
Hold on.. Let me remove the gun to your forehead making you post...
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:21 pm to SunHog
Good for them.
Did u know only 38% of their recruits from chiziks classes r still on campus?
4 are in prison
1 is @ Astate
U figure out the rest. They've sucked dick for 2/3 years. They won a MNC because of Cam Newton, not rivals rankings.
Did u know only 38% of their recruits from chiziks classes r still on campus?
4 are in prison
1 is @ Astate
U figure out the rest. They've sucked dick for 2/3 years. They won a MNC because of Cam Newton, not rivals rankings.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:22 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
Because of Cam Newton,
Recruiting? Did he play Defense too?
Baylor had one hell of a player this past year but it wasn't close to as good as the Auburn Championship defense.
We even had a Matt Jones and didn't win the SEC and National Title, why? Oh, that's right.. recruiting.
This post was edited on 2/1/12 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:23 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
4 are in prison
1 is @ Astate
Don't care they recruited and won a national title. I'm not responsible for peoples decisions.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:24 pm to SunHog
Without Cam they would've lost 3 or 4 games that year.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:25 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
U figure out the rest. They've sucked dick for 2/3 years. They won a MNC because of Cam Newton, not rivals rankings.
bullshite.
We had Matt Jones and we didn't win dick.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:25 pm to SunHog
Did you just sleep through the 2010 season? I could have SWORN we beat LSU. I could have SWORN we could have easily beaten Bama if not for 2 Mallett brain farts.
Answer me this, SunHog. What do you want us to do about these "lackluster" classes? Seriously. You keep bitching. What do you want done? Unless you've got a solution to this supposed problem, shut the frick up.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:25 pm to SunHog
quote:
good as the Auburn Championship defense
Did you seriously just say that?

Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:26 pm to SunHog
Have you even looked at the strides we have made on the defensive side of the ball? Good defensive class with better coaches (who are better recruiters)
Top SEC QB, steady WR classes (I do agree at somepoint we should land some 5* WRs), our best RB back.
These are players from the "bad" recruiting you're talking of.
Top SEC QB, steady WR classes (I do agree at somepoint we should land some 5* WRs), our best RB back.
These are players from the "bad" recruiting you're talking of.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:26 pm to SunHog
Matt Jones wasn't half the player Cam Newton is.
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:26 pm to SunHog
quote:
bullshite.
We had Matt Jones and we didn't win dick.
WOW Matt Jones is no where even close to Cam Newton...WOW
Posted on 2/1/12 at 3:27 pm to SunHog
quote:
We had Matt Jones and we didn't win dick.
Uh I'm one of the biggest Matt Jones fans out there but even I will admit that Cam Newton was drastically better than Matt and it's not even close.
Back to top
