Started By
Message
re: Why was Bama AD upset at Oats’ “Wong place wrong time” statement?
Posted on 2/26/23 at 12:23 pm to dchog
Posted on 2/26/23 at 12:23 pm to dchog
quote:
How do you know he is faking it?
Can you read his heart?
where was his outrage a month ago? Oh, the tragedy didn't potentially benefit his favorite school then. got it
Posted on 2/26/23 at 12:24 pm to dchog
quote:
How do you know he is faking it?
If he isn't, it's even more pathetic he's actually this outraged over something he has less than zero control over.
Posted on 2/26/23 at 12:30 pm to Marktastic86
quote:
Aka, a butthurt hog fan that has to fake caring about a murder victim
I’m not here to talk about how much I care about the victim. My level of care is irrelevant as to the validity of what I’ve pointed out, the questions I’ve asked, and the reasonable conclusions I’ve made. I understand why you’d prefer to change the conversation to me than what I’m saying.
Posted on 2/26/23 at 12:31 pm to chargert
quote:
where was his outrage a month ago?
The text message surfaced last week.
And I believe it also surfaced last week that Miller was the one who supplied the gun.
This post was edited on 2/26/23 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 2/26/23 at 12:32 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
the tragedy didn't potentially benefit his favorite school then
Posted on 2/26/23 at 12:34 pm to Marktastic86
quote:
If Miller had actually been charged with a crime and there wasn't a mountain of evidence (that he helped provide) helping to exonerate him of what everyone on this site wants him to be guilty of, I'd agree with you.
This isn't true.
The DA simply said there was nothing they could charge him with, that just means there wasn't enough evidence to charge him with a crime.
That's a big difference from a "mountain of evidence that exonerates him."
Posted on 2/26/23 at 12:39 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
My level of care is irrelevant as to the validity of what I’ve pointed out

Posted on 2/26/23 at 12:40 pm to EarlyCuyler3
Back to the question in OP, if Byrne just thought it was “bad timing,” but the substance of the message was true, why hasn’t he or the University actually confirmed this position that Miller was just in the wrong place at the wrong time?
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:55 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
This isn't true. The DA simply said there was nothing they could charge him with, that just means there wasn't enough evidence to charge him with a crime. That's a big difference from a "mountain of evidence that exonerates him."
Here’s a question. We’ve been told that we can’t question the words of the DDA when she said we couldn’t charge. Infallible. But how about the sentence prior? When she said “I can’t answer that”? Then immediately answered it. That seems contradictory, doesn’t it? But ignore the preceding contradictory statement and only focus on the next part which is what we want here.
To me, I would question why she would say I can’t answer that, which in legal situations is a perfectly good answer. :cue Cam Newton legal advice gif: Then immediately contradict it?
Why? Did she realize how tone deaf and defensive it sounded? So why did she jump to "we COULDN’T charge” in a situation that any of us regular folk would likely have been charged? (This is where Bammers will conflate the burden for charging vs convicting. Spoiler alert: it’s not the same)
Further, why did the reporter add the words “under the law” to her attributed statement? That’s weird, right? But nothing to see here…
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 1:09 am
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:56 am to Tuscaloosa
Please don’t talk about us…
…but I’ll bump the thread just in case
Signed,
Tuscaloosa
…but I’ll bump the thread just in case
Signed,
Tuscaloosa
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:01 am to Jon Ham
quote:
reasonable conclusions
This was your first mistake.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:17 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
The DA simply said there was nothing they could charge him with, that just means there wasn't enough evidence to charge him with a crime.

Is that what that means?
Or it means he didn’t break the law

Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:36 am to cajunbama
quote:
Is that what that means? Or it means he didn’t break the law
The most logical answer is that it means we chose not to charge.
So that you don’t feel obligated, I already know you won’t get that. It’s cool.
ETA: It seemed obvious by your comment that you’re retarded, so I said “it’s cool” so as to not be insensitive. If I was wrong about your restricted mental capacity I sincerely apologize. In that case please accept my sinceresest apologies for thinking you were retarded and replace “it’s cool" with "you can’t possibly be that stupid you fricking moron”. Thank you.
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 2:59 am
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:49 am to Tuscaloosa
He didn’t say the victim was wrong place wrong time. Don’t know what that is callouss. It seems true. She definitely was wrong place wrong time. Mother of a 5 yo, she should be home. Not hanging out with a bunch of gun wielding thugs from both sides.
Popular
Back to top
