Started By
Message
re: Why is Auburn waiting until now
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:52 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:52 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Laughing doesn’t make me wrong. I know you think Alabama did but they didn’t do what Auburn just did
And if Auburn doing this is supposed to be a dig at Alabama then it’s even more pathetic
And if Auburn doing this is supposed to be a dig at Alabama then it’s even more pathetic
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:53 pm to HunterDawg
quote:if youre going to obsess over Auburn, at least put the posters' names next to the quotes.
Some entertainment from the AU board:
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:53 pm to lsufball19
Being wrong makes you wrong. Laughing is just a response.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:54 pm to HunterDawg
quote:
Why is Auburn waiting until now to claim the fictitious NCs?
quote:
They've had four consecutive losing seasons
quote:
playcalling is going to be done by three different people, depending on the down
quote:
the quarterback situation isn't going as rosy as they had expected
quote:
The August surprise amounted to 1 commit
quote:
Hugh Freeze is playing golf
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:54 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Tell me how I’m wrong, citing specific examples. I’ll wait
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:54 pm to lsufball19
quote:
I know you think Alabama did but they didn’t do what Auburn just did
Elaborate.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:55 pm to lsufball19
quote:why are LSU fans like yoursefl so frickin dumb? Its not that complicated and has nothing to do with bama.
And if Auburn doing this is supposed to be a dig at Alabama then it’s even more pathetic
If Auburn went undefeated, were claiming the championship. Thats it. Deal with it.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:58 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Elaborate
Alabama claims one questionable title in 1941. Auburn just came up with 7 overnight. You should be embarrassed about claiming 1983, 1993 and 2004. Any non-major poll claim post poll-era is dumb. Alabama’s 1941 claim is dumb. They admit it’s dumb. Now it’s your turn
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:58 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
Its not that complicated and has nothing to do with bama.
It has everything to do with Alabama
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:01 pm to lsufball19
quote:only in your prepubescent mind
It has everything to do with Alabama
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:03 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
only in your prepubescent mind
Whatever you say bud
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:03 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Alabama claims one questionable title in 1941
Based on what i've seen as to the argument that ours our illigitimate, this is factually incorrect.
quote:
Auburn just came up with 7 overnight.
We just aligned our standards with the nationally recognized standards.
quote:
Now it’s your turn
I think claiming '58 is dumb. Feel better?
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:04 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
I’ve asked you to cite specific examples. I’m still waiting
Please elaborate on what the “nationally recognized standard” is. TIA
quote:
We just aligned our standards with the nationally recognized standards.
Please elaborate on what the “nationally recognized standard” is. TIA
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:06 pm to NWLA_Bama
quote:
it could mean that Jackson Arnold isn't panning out as expected.
You would love that of course.
How was JA "panning out" against DeBoner in 2024??
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:08 pm to lsufball19
quote:
1983
You just gave away your age if you don't see that AU got totally screwed in '83.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:12 pm to lsufball19
quote:
I’ve asked you to cite specific examples. I’m still waiting
25, 26, 30 for starters. There are others. There are also probably better claims than those years, which always surprised me when you look at the ones they did claim, including 41.
quote:
Please elaborate on what the “nationally recognized standard” is. TIA
Using polls that declare you national champion, regardless if said polls were around or established in the year of the season they are declaring you the champion.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:50 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Using polls that declare you national champion, regardless if said polls were around or established in the year of the season they are declaring you the champion.
The problem is that’s not the “standard” nationally. Because a handful of schools do it doesn’t make it the “standard.”
And even the schools that do it, they don’t claim literally any poll that has ever named them champion. Alabama, for instance, has like 10 unclaimed titles to go along with their 18 claimed titles. If what you said was the “standard” no one would have unclaimed titles which almost everyone (except I guess Auburn now) does. LSU, for instance, has 6 unclaimed titles (I was able to add 1 more now that we’ve discovered the Montgomery End of Season Champion poll the last couple of days).
And fwiw I’m not arguing that there aren’t schools that claim bullshite titles but the depths Auburn has gone is absurd. Most notably, 1958, 1983, 1993, and 2004. You can feel screwed over in 83 and 04 but you were not the national champs based on the nationally and universally recognized systems in place those years. You want to argue about the Wild West prior to the poll era in 1936, have at it, because all title claims prior to 1936 are retroactive claims by everyone. National champions weren’t recognized prior.
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:53 pm to HunterDawg
Auburn football is in their darkest days since the Barfield era.
No playoff appearances at all. And watching their in state rival having an all time period of dominance...I guess they had to do something. But it won't help Freeze any.
No playoff appearances at all. And watching their in state rival having an all time period of dominance...I guess they had to do something. But it won't help Freeze any.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:58 pm to Whitey83
A new day is upon you. The crying will continue on the rant as the 9x National Champion Auburn Tigers get back on top of the football world starting next Friday night.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 1:59 pm to lsufball19
You show your ignorance by lumping '83 in with the rest of those. I'd entertain your argument a whole lot more otherwise.
Popular
Back to top



3





