Started By
Message
Why did Auburn rule Cam ineligible yesterday?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:01 pm
This part doesn't make sense to me. Did AU find something? I am really confused by how the ineligible > eligible thing went down
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 3:02 pm
7
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:02 pm to Eyothrie
asked and answered. Auburn doesn't play football on Tuesdays or Wednesdays; any other questions?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:02 pm to Eyothrie
make the ncaa rule on it. pretty smart.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:04 pm to Eyothrie
The NCAA told Auburn they're certain Cecil solicited money, which is a violation. Protocol is that Auburn has to rule the player ineligible. They then filed for reinstatement on the grounds that the player and the university were unaware of Cecil's solicitation.
Due to no proof of Auburn or Cam knowing about the solicitation, the reinstatement was granted.
In short, nothing has changed.
Due to no proof of Auburn or Cam knowing about the solicitation, the reinstatement was granted.
In short, nothing has changed.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:04 pm to toomersdrugs
The NCAA determined a violation had occurred, we basically said ok so can we play him? They said yes.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:04 pm to Eyothrie
They finally realized that if there was evidence that something happened they had to rule him ineligible then appeal to reinstatement committee. They should have done it earlier, but were scared the NCAA might not reinstate.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:04 pm to Eyothrie
I believe this was in response to the NCAA declaring him ineligible on Monday according to the release.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:05 pm to jso0003
because this was the course of action auburn and the NCAA agreed on during the meeting before the UGA game.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:06 pm to TheJones
quote:
The NCAA told Auburn they're certain Cecil solicited money, which is a violation. Protocol is that Auburn has to rule the player ineligible. They then filed for reinstatement on the grounds that the player and the university were unaware of Cecil's solicitation.
Due to no proof of Auburn or Cam knowing about the solicitation, the reinstatement was granted.
In short, nothing has changed.
Thank you. Nice explanation.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:07 pm to Eyothrie
Tuesday is Au's clearing house day.
Typically there is no one to rule on...this Tuesday was special. Maybe next Tuesday will be special too.
Typically there is no one to rule on...this Tuesday was special. Maybe next Tuesday will be special too.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:07 pm to Eyothrie
for shits and giggles.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:09 pm to GenericHogFan
quote:
I believe this was in response to the NCAA declaring him ineligible on Monday according to the release.
Auburn declared him ineligible, not the NCAA. The NCAA simply told Auburn that they have sufficient evidence to know that a violation occurred with MState's recruitment.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:11 pm to parkjas2001
I heard it was because he left the toilet seat up
Posted on 12/1/10 at 3:12 pm to e2drummer
I'm sorry, I should have said it was in response to the NCAA informing Auburn that he had violated rules.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News