Started By
Message
re: Who is the better HC - Moorhead or Luke?
Posted on 10/25/19 at 9:39 am to deltaland
Posted on 10/25/19 at 9:39 am to deltaland
This is exactly right. I think Moorhead is probably a much smarter guy, but based on results with what he had to work with, Luke is a better coach by miles.
I think you might see us end this season at 5-7 or 4-8 looking atrocious against every team with a pulse. We’re back to Croom’s last year.
I think you might see us end this season at 5-7 or 4-8 looking atrocious against every team with a pulse. We’re back to Croom’s last year.
This post was edited on 10/25/19 at 9:40 am
0
Posted on 10/25/19 at 10:30 am to deltaland
Luke had...no talent to deal with...
He had a good qb and a great set of wr's.
He had a good qb and a great set of wr's.
Posted on 10/25/19 at 10:47 am to rebelrouser
quote:
Luke had...no talent to deal with... He had a good qb and a great set of wr's.
In addition to Dawson Knox, Scottie Phillips, Greg Little, Javon Patterson ....
Oh wait. I forgot. This is just Luke's first real year as Head Coach. Using that criteria, he and Moorhead both still suck.
Posted on 10/25/19 at 11:15 am to Farmer1906
Luke
Posted on 10/25/19 at 11:44 am to MSUcoast
quote:
Luke is definitely the better head coach
Lol based on what?
Posted on 10/25/19 at 11:45 am to Farmer1906
I think Hodor is better. He has a better staff. Moorhead seems in over his head.
Neither is very good.
Neither is very good.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News