Started By
Message
re: Who has been the most dominant CFB Program since 2000
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:34 pm to rebeltider
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:34 pm to rebeltider
quote:false. they won it on the field with ineligible players. had they not cheated, would they have been as good? probably not. next...
Clear winner here. USC
1
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:37 pm to bfniii
quote:
false. they won it on the field with ineligible players. had they not cheated, would they have been as good? probably not. next...
NO-PETE does have a sweet ring to it.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:37 pm to GeauxWarTigers
quote:the op is since 2000. even so, lsu is still the best.
if we are starting in 2000 the decade cut off would be 2009, so AU's last championship wouldn't be in discussion
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:38 pm to LarrySellers
quote:it's only subjective if you try to artificially limit the criteria, such as merely going by undefeated seasons or heismans. the more criteria you add, the more objective the evaluation and the more clear lsu is the best.
its very subjective
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:39 pm to LarrySellers
Trying not to be a homer but i really think the answer is LSU
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:43 pm to LarrySellers
quote:in inferior conferences. when they met lsu and florida, they lost. bad.
they were consistantly dominant
quote:why artificially limit the discussion that way? because you want to diminish what lsu accomplished.
if you were to argue that dominant means most top 10 seasons
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:49 pm to LarrySellers
Texas is top 3-4
people see "dominant" and think star laden teams and highlight reels, its hard not to.
Most think/remember ______ being dominant because they spent weeks at #1 during a handful of regular seasons.
people see "dominant" and think star laden teams and highlight reels, its hard not to.
Most think/remember ______ being dominant because they spent weeks at #1 during a handful of regular seasons.
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:55 pm to wish i was tebow
quote:
Trying not to be a homer but i really think the answer is LSU
I think it's Florida. And I am discounting USC because of the Bush scandal.
LINK
Period: 2000-2009
Rank..Team....TotalPts...Win.Pct.Pts....SchPts....Nat.Champs...Big4BowlPts
1......USC.....1064.62....398.44........466.18......100.00......100.00
2....Florida...1016.18....384.62........461.56......100.00......70.00
3......LSU.....975.38.....380.77........434.62......100.00......60.00
4....Oklahoma..961.04.....410.45........420.60......50.00.......80.00
5....Ohio St...953.33.....401.57........411.75......50.00.......90.00
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:57 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
It's gotta be LSU or the Gators (I think the Gators - narrowly). One thing ya hafta say about UF & LSU, when their moments came on the biggest stage they cashed in their chips. OU became known more for wilting under the bright lights ("Big Game Bob" has become a term of derision). USC cheated and lostone of their BCSNC games. And the Horns got beatdown in one of their BCSNC appearances. When it was time for the Bayou Bengals and the Gators to step up, they did.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:00 pm to LarrySellers
USC if you ignore NCAA issues.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:08 pm to joeyb147
quote:
I think it's Florida. And I am discounting USC because of the Bush scandal.
LINK
Period: 2000-2009
Rank..Team....TotalPts...Win.Pct.Pts....SchPts....Nat.Champs...Big4BowlPts
1......USC.....1064.62....398.44........466.18......100.00......100.00
2....Florida...1016.18....384.62........461.56......100.00......70.00
3......LSU.....975.38.....380.77........434.62......100.00......60.00
4....Oklahoma..961.04.....410.45........420.60......50.00.......80.00
5....Ohio St...953.33.....401.57........411.75......50.00.......90.00
your non-homerism is quite refreshing
you might have the best post of the thread, with stats, links to back up those stats, and an objective view point
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:08 pm to parkjas2001
quote:no, they played because they were deserving. had pitt taken care of business, someone else would have deserved it.
LSU only played cause of Pitt that year
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:12 pm to bfniii
quote:
no, they played because they were deserving. had pitt taken care of business, someone else would have deserved it.
Pitt was an unranked team... WV was the team who didn't take care of business. Kind of like LSU didn't take care of business against Arkansas or Kentucky...
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:13 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
It's gotta be LSU or the Gators
agree
quote:
OU became known more for wilting under the bright lights ("Big Game Bob" has become a term of derision)
Yup, I think WVU was the nail in the coffin for the "Big Game Bob" moniker.
White and Slaton single-handedly embarrassed OU, shite was glorious
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:13 pm to ohiovol
quote:
USC if you ignore NCAA issues.
I tend to agree with this, and I also tend to ignore the NCAA issues b/c the way I see it nothing reggie took from agents resulted in an on the field advantage for USC. The NCAA vacating those wins was purely a punitive measure and I think the NCAA is a joke.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:21 pm to LarrySellers
quote:and they also had a losing season which you are conveniently not factoring into your assessment
I find that to be an impressive accomplishment
quote:the discussion wasn't about who is "solid". it's about who is the best. auburn's not on the list. you're wrong. but you are successfully trolling so kudos
there were pretty solid every other year
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:23 pm to LarrySellers
quote:by that barometer, every team is "lucky" every season. stupid
they lucked out and won a title
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:29 pm to joeyb147
quote:lsu has the better winning percentage since 2000. getting even better this season.
I think it's Florida
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:32 pm to ohiovol
quote:meh. they've played in a VERY top heavy conference, cheated and beat fewer ranked teams
USC if you ignore NCAA issues.
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:34 pm to LarrySellers
quote:i asked you to name the team who deserved to be there more than lsu. crickets.
Pitt was an unranked team... WV was the team who didn't take care of business. Kind of like LSU didn't take care of business against Arkansas or Kentucky
Page 17 of 24
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News