Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Which conference dissolves first? BIG12, BIG10, or PAC12?

Posted on 8/10/20 at 8:50 pm
Posted by Tigerrotti
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
646 posts
Posted on 8/10/20 at 8:50 pm
10 years ago the BIG12 was on life support and the ACC was vulnerable as heck.

Now Clemson became a super team, Notre Dame became a partial member. Texas and Oklahoma's stubbornness has still fooled the media that a conference made up of Kansas schools Iowa St West Virginia and Southwest Conference retreads is a viable playoff worthy conference.

Now the PAC 12 and BIG10 who started all this poaching look to be the weakest lol. And the BIG12 might become the hunter.

Oh the irony! what a time to be alive

My vote is now on the PAC12 , plummeting demographics for support and time zones are killing that conference ...
This post was edited on 8/10/20 at 8:57 pm
Posted by Lemonpuppy
Mississippi
Member since May 2020
2709 posts
Posted on 8/10/20 at 8:51 pm to
B1G for sure.

Ohio State, Michigan, and Nebraska won’t deal with that shite.
Posted by LSUTIGERS8181
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2012
9988 posts
Posted on 8/10/20 at 8:53 pm to
If football continues and the big ten cancels, then obviously the big ten. The conference would be gutted.
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
17211 posts
Posted on 8/10/20 at 8:53 pm to
The Pac 12 has pretty much stopped caring about football so them. Big 10 and Big 12 have their issues but they haven't pushed football aside to focus on Olympic sports at least.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68475 posts
Posted on 8/10/20 at 9:18 pm to
The PAC 12 doesn't really care about athletics anymore. Once USC stopped caring about their athletics, the conference seemed to follow suit.

USC is the Texas of the West coast.
Posted by Nitro Express
Gulf Coast
Member since Jul 2018
16141 posts
Posted on 8/10/20 at 9:31 pm to
Big 12. It's a two team league. If one walks the whole conference crumbles.
Posted by Reservoir dawg
Member since Oct 2013
14096 posts
Posted on 8/10/20 at 10:08 pm to
Nebraska should have never gone to the B1G. Maryland should have stayed in the ACC. Stupid moves.
Posted by Shaft Williams
Central City, LA
Member since Jul 2010
9419 posts
Posted on 8/10/20 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Nebraska should have never gone to the B1G. Maryland should have stayed in the ACC. Stupid moves.


I totally agree and I think they'll both go back where they BELONG.
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
7259 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 12:55 pm to
I doubt the PAC.....they're the only major conf. on the West Coast.

Besides, who would they pair with: B10 or B12? Imagine the griping about game times by WV...& multiply that by 12!
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79986 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 1:02 pm to
They would invade and take over the Mountain West.
Posted by bunkerhill
Georgia
Member since Oct 2017
1368 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 1:30 pm to
The PAC has fiscal problems that are worse than the other P5 conferences. They are located too far away from the action and this hurts their TV exposure. Over the years they have wanted to tag along with the big ten because of the Rose bowl tie-in. The West coast, and let's face it, is populated with some extreme whack jobs. Football will lose more and more viability with those people. Look how the SEC teams are recruiting California. That is unheard of, historically.
Posted by tconle2
Member since Sep 2011
4104 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 1:35 pm to
Always thought that the Big 12 should go get USC and Oregon. The PAC 12 is the weakest of the Power 5 conferences.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter