Started By
Message
re: When Bama's best two players received improper benefits
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:38 pm to CFBFAN1121
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:38 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
CFBFAN1121
You just need to quit starting threads....
0
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:38 pm to BurnBurnBurn
I think I love Julio now too,Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:39 pm to BamaChick
quote:
No - I already posted the difference including the statement from the NCAA on both cases.
With all due respect Bamacick, Bama fans have totally ignored the NCAA's ruling on Cam being eligible for now.
The reasoning was b/c of this SEC by law that states a player should be ineligible permantly. You guys broke the same by law. So using Bama's logic, Julio and Mark should've been permantly ineligible regardless of what the NCAA ruled.
Like I said, this is what Bama fans have been saying since NCAA made a ruling. That's undeniable.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:40 pm to BamaChick
per the NCAA:
Q: What is considered mitigation that might distinguish one reinstatement case from another?
A: There are several factors, which may include the nature and scope of the violation, the assessed culpability of the student, the source of the benefits, and whether benefits were actually received by the student. Again, each case is unique and specific to each student.
Sounds about right to me..... Ingram and Jones were not culpable, and Cam didn't actually receive and benefit.... and what do you know.... both cases ended in restoration of their eligibility.
Q: What is considered mitigation that might distinguish one reinstatement case from another?
A: There are several factors, which may include the nature and scope of the violation, the assessed culpability of the student, the source of the benefits, and whether benefits were actually received by the student. Again, each case is unique and specific to each student.
Sounds about right to me..... Ingram and Jones were not culpable, and Cam didn't actually receive and benefit.... and what do you know.... both cases ended in restoration of their eligibility.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:42 pm to LSU8932
Again, if you think hundreds of thousands of dollars to secure a recruit's signature = a $500 one day fishing trip, then I'm done with you.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:44 pm to BamaChick
quote:
Again, if you think hundreds of thousands of dollars to secure a recruit's signature = a $500 one day fishing trip, then I'm done with you.
but but but the bylaw states explicitly without regard for price from what i saw
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:44 pm to lowspark12
quote:
Q: What is considered mitigation that might distinguish one reinstatement case from another?
A: There are several factors, which may include the nature and scope of the violation, the assessed culpability of the student, the source of the benefits, and whether benefits were actually received by the student. Again, each case is unique and specific to each student.
Sounds about right to me..... Ingram and Jones were not culpable, and Cam didn't actually receive and benefit.... and what do you know.... both cases ended in restoration of their eligibility.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:45 pm to BamaChick
So hundreds of thousands were paid?????
Link Please???
Link Please???
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:46 pm to BamaChick
quote:
Again, if you think hundreds of thousands of dollars to secure a recruit's signature = a $500 one day fishing trip, then I'm done with you.
Did Mark and Julio receive an improper benefit?
Yes
Have bama fas been pointing this by law that states if you receive an improper benefit, you should be permantly ineligible?
Yes
Are Bama fans now saying, if we break this same by law,it's ok that a player isnt ruled ineligible. But if Cam broke the By law he should be ineligible?
Yes
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:46 pm to bmy
Cam - felon, proven liar, as recently as last month.
Cecil - Proven liar and agreed by Auburn that he sought money for Cam.
Cecil and Cam - tight and conversed several times a week before signing. Cam loved one school, but so tight with his dad, he let him choose a different school. But he doesn't know anything.
Cecil - Proven liar and agreed by Auburn that he sought money for Cam.
Cecil and Cam - tight and conversed several times a week before signing. Cam loved one school, but so tight with his dad, he let him choose a different school. But he doesn't know anything.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:47 pm to BamaChick
so had Ingram and Jones flown on a private Jet to Hawaii and gone deep see fishing your opinion would be different?.... at what point is it okay to receive extra benefits?
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:50 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Cam - felon, proven liar, as recently as last month.
Cecil - Proven liar and agreed by Auburn that he sought money for Cam.
Cecil and Cam - tight and conversed several times a week before signing. Cam loved one school, but so tight with his dad, he let him choose a different school. But he doesn't know anything
Did Julio and Mark Ingram break the same by law that bama fans have been saying should've ruled Cam permantly ineligible
A simple yes or no will be suffice
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:50 pm to CFBFAN1121
Cam - felon, proven liar, as recently as last month.
Cecil - Proven liar and agreed by Auburn that he sought money for Cam.
Cecil and Cam - tight and conversed several times a week before signing. Cam loved one school, but so tight with his dad, he let him choose a different school. But he doesn't know anything.
Cecil - Proven liar and agreed by Auburn that he sought money for Cam.
Cecil and Cam - tight and conversed several times a week before signing. Cam loved one school, but so tight with his dad, he let him choose a different school. But he doesn't know anything.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:51 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Cam - felon, proven liar, as recently as last month.
Cecil - Proven liar and agreed by Auburn that he sought money for Cam.
Cecil and Cam - tight and conversed several times a week before signing. Cam loved one school, but so tight with his dad, he let him choose a different school. But he doesn't know anything.
Translation, yes they did, but i cant admit that so i'll just change the subject.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:52 pm to CFBFAN1121
Cam - charged for a felony, proven liar, as recently as last month.
Cecil - Proven liar and agreed by Auburn that he sought money for Cam.
Cecil and Cam - tight and conversed several times a week before signing. Cam loved one school, but so tight with his dad, he let him choose a different school. But he doesn't know anything.
Cecil - Proven liar and agreed by Auburn that he sought money for Cam.
Cecil and Cam - tight and conversed several times a week before signing. Cam loved one school, but so tight with his dad, he let him choose a different school. But he doesn't know anything.
This post was edited on 12/3/10 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:52 pm to Alahunter
Cam's a felon?..... interesting.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:52 pm to RollTide1987
What about all the athletes at Bama that got money from the whole textbook scandal? By strict definition, everyone of those athletes should have been banned from SEC play for their career.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:53 pm to lowspark12
He committed felony acts. He lied to the police. He lied to Auburn and SI last month in an article about what happened. He's got a track record of being dishonest.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:54 pm to lowspark12
ALAHunter , are you clicking your red slippers together as you continue to post the same thing with your eyes closed hoping it will come true?
No place like home, No place like home
No place like home, No place like home
This post was edited on 12/3/10 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:54 pm to Alahunter
and that makes him a felon?.... interesting.
By your above posts, I guess we can now label you a liar, seeing as how cam isn't a felon.
By your above posts, I guess we can now label you a liar, seeing as how cam isn't a felon.
Page 4 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News