Started By
Message
What calls are reviewable or challengeable?
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 5/25/24 at 6:57 pm
I’m assuming the NCAA decides this, right?
Just like I felt after the NOLA no call, if you have the technology, every call should be a call that a challenge could be used on.
Just like I felt after the NOLA no call, if you have the technology, every call should be a call that a challenge could be used on.
2
Posted on 5/25/24 at 7:06 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
What calls are reviewable or challengeable?
1. Specified Fair/Foul Ball Calls
2. Potential Home Run calls
3. Catch or No Catch in the outfield or foul territory
4. Catch Plays in the infield
5. Spectator Interference
6. Scoring Plays at Home Plate inclusive of collisions (illegal and/or malicious slides) time plays,obstruction, and missed base (all aspects)
7. Force/Tag Play Calls
8. Base Running (if a runner pass another runner, or misses bag)
9. Hit by Pitch (HBP)
10. Tag-Ups
11. Non-Home Run Boundary Calls
12. Interference for the Purpose of Breaking up a Double Play
13. Catcher’s Interference (Only in regard to the batter’s swing except on a squeeze play or steal of home)
14. Malicious Contact
Posted on 5/25/24 at 7:23 pm to LSUFanHouston
My guess ..challenge or review able
Means umps wait for Birmingham to review video...but anytime a coach can bitch about a call and the umps can change it but without video evidence
Means umps wait for Birmingham to review video...but anytime a coach can bitch about a call and the umps can change it but without video evidence
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News