LSUFanHouston
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | NOLA |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 40114 |
| Registered on: | 7/22/2009 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: LHSAA Legislative Meeting Eddie Refuses to show up
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 9:40 pm to lsu777
quote:
At least the 1 time transfer rule. Its dumb AF, we dont have it and communities act like they own kids. let the school compete in terms of academics, coaching, facilities etc. Dont want a kid to go to a rival school....than get better.
That’s fine within a school district. Make all public high schools have an attendance zone that’s the size of the school district.
Allowing out of district students on a large scale causes issues far greater than athletics
0
re: LHSAA Legislative Meeting Eddie Refuses to show up
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 9:27 pm to sk1991
Whatever issues the LHSAA has, it is because it is ultimately run by principals, 90 percent of them who are incompetent.
And that’s still far better than involving the state government.
And that’s still far better than involving the state government.
re: LHSAA Legislative Meeting Eddie Refuses to show up
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 9:24 pm to sk1991
quote:
Private Organization using public school kids to make money.
Non-Profit that no one is getting rich off of
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 2:17 pm to geauxpurple
quote:
Don’t be surprised to see him on the sidelines Saturday.
Since we’ve reached the “let it all burn down” phase… why the hell not? Kinda want to see this now!
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 2:14 pm to OceanMan
quote:
Because they know it will be litigated and likely go to trial. If they pull that card, Brian gets nothing.
Or, Brian wins, and lsu has to pay other damages as well.
Anyone who believes lsu has the upper hand here has a level of confidence that does not seem warranted, given the people in charge right now.
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 2:13 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Why would LSU give up that negotiating chip? Even if it’s borderline and would undergo litigation you keep that in your back pocket.
Because future coaches are watching.
And future players are watching. When will LSU try to do this to a player?
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 10:59 am to Adam Banks
quote:
LSU would be well within its rights and would in fact be GENEROUS to try to negotiate a reduced lump sum settlement despite having the ability to fire for cause.
The ability to fire for cause must be backed up with actual proveable cause.
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 10:43 am to Fast Times @ LSU
quote:
negotiating in good faith an ending.
Why is lsu negotiating if they have what they need to fire for cause?
Because they either don’t have it or aren’t confident it will withstand trial.
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 10:30 am to OceanMan
quote:
The terms of separation have not been settled. Kelly is trying to frame that as LSU changing the deal, while a deal hasn’t actually been made.
The terms of separation are in the original contract.
Both sides can certainly amend the contract to select other terms. But the “default” is there.
Very rarely at this level are contracts completely fulfilled.
Coach is fired
Coach resigns
Coach retires
Contracted is extended
Contract is replaced
Contract is fulfilled
That last option is least common
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 10:15 am to OceanMan
quote:
The contract doesn’t say he is owed his full compensation no matter what. You have to understand that part first.
No one has said that.
He is owed 90 percent of certain parts, over time, with duty to mitigate.
The duty to mitigate is much like a non-compete… hard to enforce.
So lsu has to prove cause, or has to prove BK is not mitigating.
Easy to understand why LSU wants negotiated lump sum.
BK may be betting that lsu does not have cause and he is not worried about mitigation, maybe smart maybe not.
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 10:11 am to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
You can be sent home from work and not be fired.
I’m not told to clean out my desk if it’s temporary
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 8:46 am to moneyg
quote:
The post that said Kelly should be coaching until the paperwork is finalized is ridiculous.
When other schools have fired for cause…
They initially suspend the coach with pay “pending an investigation”
Then the coach is given cause for termination and there is an appeal process.
Then he is terminated.
This is standard procedure. This was not followed.
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 8:38 am to moneyg
quote:
That should be an easy sell to Kelly, as long as both parties are reasonable.
If LSU offered the present value of the future payments, sure.
Seems like they are offering less than that.
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 8:36 am to OceanMan
quote:
I’m offering this as a potential explanation. People need to forget the lawsuit, that’s just Kelly’s side of the story which LSU deserves a chance to respond to.
There are three sides to every story.
What’s concerning people is we see how Landry / the state / the university handle things and it’s not exactly inspiring confidence.
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 8:34 am to OceanMan
quote:
I haven’t seen anything suggesting that they haven’t paid or are not planning on paying Kelly.
Well if they are now trying to terminate for cause…
re: our last chance to win a conference game this year,
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 8:06 am to Alt26
quote:
Nothing has been said, and I doubt he would say so publicly, but there is a possibility that Van Buren could chose to "opt out" of the next two games. He's played in 3 games. He can only play in one more without losing his ability to RS.
And there is I think a good chance Nuss opts out if a bowl game
So play Nuss rest of regular season then MVB in bowl game.
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 8:01 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Agreed. Are you just trying to say what LSU is doing is wrong? I think most people would agree with you
People are human and make mistakes
To me, this goes beyond that and is destroying the reputation of the university and the state.
re: It's all on Woodward
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 7:51 am to tzimme4
quote:
What makes you think I need a "better" job? Insecure much
A “man” with low expectations.
Might want to get your t levels checked.
re: "Only a band of idiots could screw up LSU football."
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 7:50 am to CEOTiger
quote:
This is a paid media hit piece. Kelly’s attorneys are placing media stories to gain leverage.
The media doesn’t need much help…
re: So if Kelly has not been fired nor suspended..
Posted by LSUFanHouston on 11/12/25 at 7:45 am to moneyg
quote:
the decision has been made pending formal board approval
So until that happens… 1-3 should not have.
If this was the way lsu wanted to go, they should have suspended him and issued notice to intend to terminate for cause.
If you are terminating a contract for cause, you better have every duck in a row from the start.
Weeks later, lsu can’t even find the ducks, much less have them in a row.
Popular
20
