Started By
Message

re: Week 1 Assessment

Posted on 9/5/25 at 8:05 pm to
Posted by Smokeyone
Maryville Tn
Member since Jul 2016
20823 posts
Posted on 9/5/25 at 8:05 pm to
Allowing a UCLA to “take” a starting QB implies that the Vols were out bid, or out pursued by UCLA which is factually incorrect.
Posted by Eldodroptop
Member since Jul 2021
2998 posts
Posted on 9/5/25 at 8:10 pm to
Solid football content on the rant?

Nice!

Well done Aggie. Well done indeed.

Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
41930 posts
Posted on 9/5/25 at 8:16 pm to
Upvoted OP. Thanks for putting in the effort and taking the time.
Posted by DrKnievel
Belgium, MT
Member since Sep 2016
409 posts
Posted on 9/5/25 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Allowing a UCLA to “take” a starting QB implies that the Vols were out bid, or out pursued by UCLA which is factually incorrect.


Or by cutting him, the vols allowed UCLA to take him. You took their QB, are you going to argue that too?

You provided clarity which I’m fine with, but let’s not act like I was attacking or disparaging the vols.

If you want to die on this hill, feel free. I never implied anything. Those are your words on what you think I implied.
Posted by Volatile
Tennessee
Member since Apr 2014
6092 posts
Posted on 9/5/25 at 8:27 pm to
Oh and to you idiots that downvoted that, Tennessee led the conference in rushing last year by 400 yards and it ain’t just because of Dylan Sampson.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter