DrKnievel

[quote]He said what he thinks is evidence. “I think it’s impossible to have renovations done without paying for them upfront. Ergo, Paxton committed a crime.” That’s his (almost) entire argument. [/quote] Ha - my entire argument? Why don’t you tell me what you think my argument is...

Cheers brother! :cheers: It’s difficult to debate someone when you bring relevant information to the table, and they don’t address any of it and just continually say, the prosecution has to prove its case. You never engaged in any debate of the details. All of my responses specifically addresse...

[quote]Of course it was. That was central to Paxton’s defense. But I guess you and I watched different trials. Look, I thank you for the reasoned debate, but if you believe the prosecution brought a strong case, strong enough to convict beyond a reasonable doubt, consider yourself on the side of...

[quote]To reply to your TL;DR post earlier...see the reply by TheBigMuffaletta. Sums my position up. If Ken Paxton is doing illegal shite, fine. INVESTIGATE, INDICT, MAKE YOUR CASE. THE RIGHT WAY. Did you happen to miss how the House rammed the indictment through in hours instead of the usual weeks? ...

Maybe we aren’t on the same page here. I’ve done lots of single and multi family projects. Anything of significance (>$50k), I’ve always had to do that. I’m not saying your experiences can’t be different, but everyone went down like that. Don’t know if that changed the context for y’all or n...

Please explain to us how the democrats got Paxton impeached and there was no evidence in a trial where both sides presented evidence, Einstein ...

The legal opinion that Paxton offered at midnight on a Saturday that prevented foreclosure sales outside. I’ll try to be briefer. In the trial (and you can watch it for yourself), they had a draft copy that referenced some federal opinion or law(can’t remember). They sent it to Paxton on a F...

[quote]His legal analysis is also not correct. I practice labor and employment defense (representing management) and we frequently settle cases where the company fired the employee for legitimate reasons.[/quote] Simple question - why? I said there could be other reasons so I’m not sure how th...

I realize you weren’t replying to me, but I’ll have a go. [quote]I know you didn't watch the trial, one of the big problems with the prosecution's case was they charged Paxton with accepting a bribe in the form of a kitchen renovation. But Paxton's defense team had the 'receipts' - notably, phot...

I’ll help you out. A prepared speech is much easier to do in another language. Answering questions, it was to his advantage to use a translator so he could process the questions better. It’s really is as simple as that...