Favorite team:Texas A&M 
Location:Belgium, MT
Biography:The details of my life are quite inconsequential
Interests:Motorcycles and world domination
Occupation:Head of Worldwide Organization
Number of Posts:525
Registered on:9/24/2016
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

It is sort of funny that there are numerous people that share the sentiment that the republican house and senate were functionally useless

But in this instance they're the final authority on truth


Did you read what I wrote? I’ll use an analogy. Let’s say you commit a crime in Louisiana and I ask everyone in Texas whether you did it or not. Nobody in Texas has seen a thing. That doesn’t make you innocent. I was just asking the wrong people.

You may take it as the truth but objective people see through the propaganda.
Hate to piss on your parade, but a committee that failed to interview most of the victims clears him of nothing. That would be like going to the furniture store and when you get home, you told your wife the store was out of milk. I’m not saying he is guilty, but to say he is free of any guilt without interviewing relevant witnesses is absurd.

I’m pretty sure this is the same committee that had “the goods” on Biden for impeachment, yet he was never impeached.

Nope - not a liberal. Just being objective.
As a Texan, we will have to see how this plays out. I’m not convinced Texas really turned blue vs being angry at the current state of affairs.

If trump works with the democrats (and likewise the democrats work with trump) and improvements in inflation and prices occur, we will have to see who actually gets credit and is rewarded.

If the term is a bloodbath on where the country should go, and nothing changes, I suspect trump will be blamed as he was for midterms, but don’t underestimate the democrats ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. They could try to push things too far left and bite themselves in the foot.

It will be an interesting couple of years, but it would appear that Trump is ramping up to fight instead of some level of compromise.
What he saying is accurate, but it only mentioned the house - not the senate. The house can impeach him, but that doesn’t mean the senate will convict him.

What has me curious is can he be impeached twice or is that double jeopardy? I’m sure they can come up with different charges, but it could be a weaker case. Curious what a lawyer says about this.

He is more likely to not be convicted today than he will in a couple of months, so this may be to the republicans advantage here.
A disaster - I’m just not sure for who.

If inflation comes down along with prices, both will claim credit.

If inflation remains elevated and prices remain high, then who do you blame? I would suspect Trump would get blamed, but who knows.
Here is an objective take that I’m sure everyone will hate.

You have a liberal guy trying to pat himself on the back and take some credit for online marketing. Did it get some votes? Sure. Did it fundamentally change the election? No

You have a conservative guy “exposing” him for doing online marketing. It’s not exactly new, and I’m sure the republicans were doing online marketing as well.

Both dudes seem ridiculous to me.
Why do we need a border wall at this point? Policy works just fine and you save tons of money.
Our offense should be relegated to high school. :banghead:
quote:

I know a lot of highly intelligent minorities who would have no issue with an aptitude test. Conversely I know a bunch of whites who couldn’t pass one if their lives depended on it. Has nothing to do with race or political affiliation and has everything to do with a basic understanding of the principles this country was founded on and living up to those principles.


You started at aptitude and have ended up at intelligence which are not the same thing. I’ll let you google the difference.

The problem is where do you draw the line. I’m not attacking you here but let’s hypothetically say you fall under the line. Are you ok losing your vote, or are you just concerned about penalizing others that in your eyes aren’t worthy? See the slippery slope here?

It’s the same issue I stated in my prior post. You are trying to anticipate bad decision makers before they have made a bad decision, at least in your eyes. Being stupid isn’t a crime, but a lot of stupid people commit crimes.

There is no such standard for citizenship (unless you are trying to become a citizen), so why do you think one should be applied to voting?

There will also be a problem administering ~175M tests. Yeah - let’s create more work for inefficient governments. The other subtlety here is we know the test won’t be free, so we are going to penalize low income earners with a cost they can’t afford? Doesn’t seem very democratic to me.
The system is working as designed.

Sounds like you want to implement precogs (from the movie minority report). Good luck with that. You can’t prevent somebody from voting before they commit a crime - only after if it is warranted.

Your aptitude tests sound like some Jim Crow level BS to prevent people from voting.

re: If Trump’s last 2 years

Posted by DrKnievel on 11/7/26 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

are a success as far as inflation and job creation are concerned do the democrats take credit for it? Or should he let it tank and blame the democrats for it?


Let me get this right - you are entertaining shitting on the entire country to win an election. As Yoda would say, “Einstein you are not”
quote:

It’s absolutely ridiculous that a primaried congressman is impeaching a member of his own party on the way out and people cheer him on.


I’ll presume he is innocent until proven guilty if anything comes of it, but I just want to make sure I understand you correctly. You are ok with your team cheating and violating the laws as long as he is on your team?

Maybe I’m unique here, but you either break the law or you didn’t. What team you are on shouldn’t matter.
I don’t think people realize how much politics is like ncaa football. People on both sides are quick to judge the other side, but dismiss the same/similar conduct/problem when their party does the same shite.

In football, they created a rule that even if the head coach isn’t directly responsible for a violation, they can still be charged because ultimately, the head coach is responsible for the people he brings into the organization, yet in politics, these politicians gets a free pass for firing someone they were responsible for hiring. People seem to overlook that key point. Whether you like or hate wiles, this mistake lasted for two years, so whose fault is it really? Seems like it is an easy excuse to scapegoat somebody instead of applying accountability properly. Waiting until after the election was a reactive response vs a proactive one. Should we not ding someone for being reactive vs proactive? Back to my original point, people are willing to overlook things on their team that they would be screaming from the rafters if the other team did it.

I’d say your anger/frustration is misplaced because you are willing to overlook who brought her in because of your affinity for a particular person. She wasn’t elected - she was appointed.
That is why I said the defense was the bigger surprise
Before the year started, good defense and average offense.

Today - maybe average defense, less than good offense.

Bigger surprise was the defense. They may come around at some point. Sputtering offense has been consistent over the last several years. Good against average or bad defense. Unacceptable against good defenses.
quote:

Now do 247!!! it’s amazing how Ole Miss only wants to believe one side of the story, pretty much how it’s been for the last six weeks.


Maybe this has been discussed and I missed it, but why are the two services so drastically different? Something seems way off for fundamentally measuring the same thing.
Accusations without evidence is just conspiracy theory.

Tip of the hat to Ole Miss

Posted by DrKnievel on 1/8/26 at 10:32 pm
Great season and fought hard until the end. I was impressed with how y’all finished.

re: Marcell Reed is overrated…

Posted by DrKnievel on 12/20/25 at 2:47 pm to
He is a sophomore that just completed his first full year as QB. He was good most of the year, but certainly struggled down the stretch. He will be fine.
quote:

Comprehend?


If you read the thread, then you read where I said this was pathetic before you posted anything.

I’ll point out again that your first statement had absolutely nothing to do with your second statement, yet you speak like it is all logical and straight forward when it clearly was not. That was my point, Einstein.