Started By
Message
re: UGA Dynasty?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:12 pm to Dawgfanman
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:12 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
So Bama Dynasty ended in 17, right?
????
From 2009 to 2020
Alabama won half the NC’s
Alabama won over half the SECC’s
And had I higher win percentage than 0.850
These are the dynasty years imo
1
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:15 pm to GratefulTideDye
quote:A dynasty has more to do with winning (ETA to add: Conference)titles, imo. I mean do we take away 2011 and 2017 because Alabama didn't even play for the SECC? Do we take those years out of consideration for Alabama's dynasty, or are they are part of the dynasty because they won titles those two years?
They have won exactly 1 SEC Championship in 6 years.
ETA
If we want to consider only years in which a conference title is won, then Michigan might be in the middle of a dynasty.
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:17 pm to DawgsLife
If you can’t dominate your own conference how can you call yourself a dynasty?
From 2009 to 2020 Alabama won 7 out of 12 conference championships.
This is what a dynasty looks like.
From 2009 to 2020 Alabama won 7 out of 12 conference championships.
This is what a dynasty looks like.
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:22 pm to MacMan10
quote:
If you can’t dominate your own conference how can you call yourself a dynasty?
If UGA has 2 losses in the last 3 years, how have they not been dominant in conference play?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:23 pm to atlanta917
2nd best. 0-3 vs the big dog in the title game.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:25 pm to MacMan10
quote:
2nd best. 0-3 vs the big dog in the title game.
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. go back and read the question again.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:25 pm to GratefulTideDye
Gumps sure do seem triggered by the thought
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:29 pm to MacMan10
quote:
From 2009 to 2020
Alabama won half the NC’s
And from 2021-present UGA has won 66% of the NCs.
We are not what I'd call a dynasty, but people acting like it's preposterous to even be discussing are equally off base, IMO.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:30 pm to WG_Dawg
Minimum of 3 NC’s required for a dynasty. See orginal post.
Georgia needs another title in the next three years and win 2 out of 3 conference titles.
Georgia needs another title in the next three years and win 2 out of 3 conference titles.
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:35 pm to MacMan10
quote:
Minimum of 3 NC’s required for a dynasty. See orginal post. Georgia needs another title in the next three years and win 2 out of 3 conference titles.
Pretty sure if UGA won the next 3 (or even 2) NCs and zero conference titles we’d be considered a dynasty.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:37 pm to Dawgfanman
Are yall already giving up on winning the conference?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:41 pm to MacMan10
quote:
Are yall already giving up on winning the conference?
No just saying the original post seems silly.
For instance you include 17-20 as part of your dynasty, but during that period you didn’t win more than half the conference titles or more than half the NCs.
I’m saying we win an NC (or two) in the next year or 3 and it’s a dynasty, the conference championship isn’t really a consideration…Bama fans opinions not withstanding.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:43 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
For instance you include 17-20 as part of your dynasty, but during that period you didn’t win more than half the conference titles or more than half the NCs.
Wouldn’t have been a dynasty if you don’t include the years we won 4 out of 7
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:58 pm to GratefulTideDye
quote:
UGA Dynasty?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 2:10 pm to MacMan10
quote:
If you can’t dominate your own conference how can you call yourself a dynasty?
From 2009 to 2020 Alabama won 7 out of 12 conference championships.
This is what a dynasty looks like.
Conference titles have been meaning less since teams like Alabama and UGA have won national titles without conference titles.
They'll mean extremely little going forward as more than half the playoff field won't be teams that won their conference.
Conference titles don't mean what they used to, and they're about to mean almost nothing. It's all about the national title.
Alabama won 6 national titles between 2009 and 2020. That's what marks them as a dynasty. The conference titles really don't factor in much.
If UGA wins a national title in the next year or two, they enter dynasty status. Winning 3 more conference titles won't do it. They don't matter.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 2:19 pm to DawginSC
Getting consistently beaten by the best team in your conference isn't nothing.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 2:22 pm to MacMan10
quote:
If you can’t dominate your own conference how can you call yourself a dynasty?
So we do ignore 2017 and 2011 for Alabama? Is that what we are saying? I mean, maybe Alabama was never a dynasty.
quote:So Michigan and Ohio State have ongoing dynasties since they dominated their conference?
This is what a dynasty looks like.
In that case I will take a National Dynasty over a conference dynasty. So, what are your criteria for a National Dynasty?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 2:24 pm to MacMan10
quote:
Getting consistently beaten by the best team in your conference isn't nothing.
It is if you win a National Championship. I mean, you don't think a team can have a bad game? MOST people would not say that Alabama had the better team in 2023.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 2:26 pm to MacMan10
duplicate post
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 1/24/24 at 2:26 pm to MacMan10
quote:
Getting consistently beaten by the best team in your conference isn't nothing.
If you go on to win the national title, it's absolutely nothing. Completely unimportant.
Conference titles used to matter because way back when you had to win the conference to be in the national title hunt.
Them Bama won in 2012 despite not winning their division, let alone the conference.
They did the same in 2017.
Then UGA won the national title while losing the SECCG in 2021.
Conference championships have been meaning less and less because of results like that.
Now with the 12 team playoff, they won't matter much at all. Only the winning of national titles will matter. UGA would have been in a 12 team playoff every year from 2017 on. Not winning the SEC often wouldn't have mattered at all if they won another national championship or two.
Finish with 2 losses or less, make the playoff, win the championship. That's what will matter. SECCG? It just makes winning the national title a bit easier due to getting a bye. Otherwise it's of minimal importance.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News