Started By
Message
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:30 pm to sugatowng
Hunter is the best WR in the league. Wright/Randle/Rogers are in the 2nd tier. Fat Alshon/Maze/Adams 3rd tier.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:31 pm to WG_Dawg
Lutz looked like garbage against lsu. Had like 5 drops.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:31 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Tight End A
31 catches, 390 yards, 12.6 average, 5 touchdowns
Tight End B
17 catches, 158 yards, 9.3 average, 5 touchdowns
Tell me who is the better tight end please.
The one that only catches TDs.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:31 pm to AuburnisGreatEtc
quote:
Trent Richardson is not better than Michael Dyer. He's also not better than Marcus Lattimore, but I dunno if he gets included.




Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:32 pm to volfan30
quote:
Hunter is the best WR in the league
Hunter is a stud that isn't playing...thats why I didn't include Knile Davis
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:32 pm to sugatowng
QB: I guess Wilson. Bray would probably be here if he weren't injured.
RB: Richardson
WR: Randle
TE: Charles
OL: Chris Faulk
DE: Melvin Ingram
DT: Brockers
LB: Upshaw/Trevathan/Hightower
CB: Claiborne
S: Reid
K: Sturgis
P: Wing
RB: Richardson
WR: Randle
TE: Charles
OL: Chris Faulk
DE: Melvin Ingram
DT: Brockers
LB: Upshaw/Trevathan/Hightower
CB: Claiborne
S: Reid
K: Sturgis
P: Wing
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:32 pm to WG_Dawg
Bama fans, why exactly is Trent Richardson better than Mike Dyer? Alabama's got one of the best Olines in the nation, Dyer's running behind a bunch of new guys and they have basically even production.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:32 pm to Maximus
quote:
Lutz looked like garbage against lsu. Had like 5 drops.

Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:33 pm to sugatowng
quote:
Put down the crack pipe.....now....before you hurt yourself.

Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:33 pm to AuburnisGreatEtc
quote:
Trent Richardson is not better than Michael Dyer.
lol
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:34 pm to blzr
quote:
TE Lutz
K Parkey
P Clark
not sure if yer serious or not, but have u ever heard of Brad Wing?
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:34 pm to parkjas2001
So less catches and 5 TDs is better than more catches and 5 TDs? Not to mention more yards and a higher average.
Got it.
Got it.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:34 pm to AuburnisGreatEtc
quote:
Bama fans, why exactly is Trent Richardson better than Mike Dyer? Alabama's got one of the best Olines in the nation, Dyer's running behind a bunch of new guys and they have basically even production.
Dyer is a good back. The third best back in the league in my opinion, but Trent Richardson he is not. Lattimore he is not.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:35 pm to speckledtrout
that's not a crack pipe he's pulling on, that's opium. 

Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:35 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Got it.
knew you would
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:36 pm to AuburnisGreatEtc
quote:
Trent Richardson is not better than Michael Dyer.



Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:37 pm to WG_Dawg
Tight End A
31 catches, 390 yards, 12.6 average, 5 touchdowns
Tight End B
17 catches, 158 yards, 9.3 average, 5 touchdowns
Tight End C
28 catches, 321 yards, 11.5 average, 1 touchdowns
If only he got more touches in the red zone.
31 catches, 390 yards, 12.6 average, 5 touchdowns
Tight End B
17 catches, 158 yards, 9.3 average, 5 touchdowns
Tight End C
28 catches, 321 yards, 11.5 average, 1 touchdowns
If only he got more touches in the red zone.

This post was edited on 11/9/11 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:37 pm to tuptiger
quote:
Dyer is a good back. The third best back in the league in my opinion, but Trent Richardson he is not. Lattimore he is not.
Dude runs behind a mediocre Oline in an offense that can't figure out the forward pass and basically runs against a stacked box every time he touches the ball.
Popular
Back to top
