Started By
Message
re: To all the SEC fans who claim the PAC-10/12 is pathetic need to see this
Posted on 8/13/11 at 4:38 am to TheRoarRestoredInBR
Posted on 8/13/11 at 4:38 am to TheRoarRestoredInBR
What is with all these out of conference fans on this board?
2
Posted on 8/13/11 at 4:40 am to gatorprincess815
conference envy
Posted on 8/13/11 at 4:41 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
That is another SEC fan Myth. UO never designed their stadium to be loud. They designed it to be cheaply built and thus did not have enough money to make it bigger around the field. That is why the field is so small and hardly any room around it. Thus the fans are right over the top of you feeling wise. Another even greater reason is because of the fans. Grandma's do not go to these games like in SEC land. Almost every single fan is standing the whole entire time yelling their guts out all while forming the sign of our "O". LSU fans are legendary for getting into a game as well, but you have not seen our fans. We take that to a whole other level. The acustics are incredible at UO, for sure, but that was a accident and not by design. Fans + Stadium = the loudest venue to see a game.
The Oregon "O" face. Usually done when they get fricked by the SEC.
Oregon Grandmas:
SEC Grandmas:
Please continue.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 4:57 am to cokebottleag
nice cokebottle 
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:28 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Stanford, Cal, USC all won a Championship this last year. Also If you did now know, there is a thing called the Directors Cup which gathers the points for all sports across all of land. Stanford won it and I think Cal got second or third. So literally one can say the best all around Athletic program is found in the PAC for 2010, and the 2nd or 3rd best too. Not to mention our nickname for our Conference is called, "The Conference of Champions" for a reason and that is because we have more Championships in all sports in all history. And the 2nd best Conference is a whopping over 200 titles short of us. Translation: the gap is extremely large between the PAC-10 and the rest for all sports.
That's because you west coasters count all of those pussy sports. You guys rule mens gymnastics, don't you?
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:51 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:Ummmm...NO! LSU won the AP and BCS title in 07. USC didn't even finish in the Top 2.
Ya, actually USC has 2 AP titles the last few years, not just 1 as the AP did not take that Bush era one away and gave another to them when you all at LSU won yours that 2 loss season.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:55 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
And then the PAC will just continue doing what they always do: Scheduling hard
you do that the sec will keep winning national championships
Bingo. You just nailed it. It is your secret formula. Almost all SEC teams do not have to play any real teams all OOC season. That pads stats and records. But if you did have to play actual teams OOC, you might, wait..... LOSE. And your chances of making a title game go out the door.
that would be a great argument - if it had any resemblance to the truth... let's see who the recent SEC champs played ooc:
2006 Florida - FSU
2007 LSU - Va Tech (raped em)
2008 Florida - FSU, Miami
2009 Alabama - Va Tech
2010 Auburn - Clemson
And considering Oregon plays some awful filler teams in their out of conference games (note this year and last year for example) - you really have no room to complain
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:57 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
I only started this OP because it got old seeing SEC rantards saying over and over that the PAC-10 is pathetic. Ya, the same Conference that has beat the SEC more often this last Century. Pretty pathetic to do that, yep.
I think you're confused.
All-time records of SEC teams vs. the PAC conference:
Bama: 13-5-1
AU: 4-2
Arkansas (since '92): 0-2 (boo, Pigs!)
UF: 6-4-1
UGA: 10-4-1
UK: 2-0
LSU: 13-3
Ole Miss: Never have played a PAC school.
MSU: 1-2
USCe (since '92): Have not played.
Tennessee:14-14-3
Vandy: 0-1
All-time: Six SEC teams have winning records vs. the PAC, three have losing records, one has a .500 record.
PAC teams vs. the SEC:
Arizona: 1-5-1
ASU: 0-3
Cal: 6-11
Oregon: 4-5
Oregon: 0-11-1
USC: 16-10-1
Stanford: 5-1-1
UCLA: 12-12-2
Washington: 1-7
WSU: 1-7
All-time: Two PAC teams have winning records, seven have losing records, and the one tie (UCLA).
To the point of your thread title, I'd say the PAC is indeed, pathetic. And you need PAC to spell it.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:59 am to molsusports
quote:LSU 2007 AP and BCS Champions.
AP Top 25
RK TEAM RECORD PTS
1 LSU (60) 12-2 1620
2 Georgia (3) 11-2 1515
3 USC (1) 11-2 1500
4 Missouri 12-2 1347
5 Ohio State 11-2 1346
6 West Virginia 11-2 1342
7 Kansas (1) 12-1 1303
8 Oklahoma 11-3 1139
9 Virginia Tech 11-3 1096
10 Texas 10-3 962
10 Boston College 11-3 962
12 Tennessee 10-4 904
13 Florida 9-4 685
14 Brigham Young 11-2 654
15 Auburn 9-4 648
16 Arizona State 10-3 587
17 Cincinnati 10-3 566
18 Michigan 9-4 508
19 Hawaii 12-1 460
20 Illinois 9-4 443
21 Clemson 9-4 353
22 Texas Tech 9-4 308
23 Oregon 9-4 253
24 Wisconsin 9-4 202
25 Oregon State 9-4 110
Others receiving votes: Virginia 66, Penn State 61, Kentucky 57, Wake Forest 53, Boise State 25, Arkansas 13, Utah 9, Mississippi State 7, Appalachian State 5, South Florida 5, Tulsa 4, Connecticut 3, Air Force 2, Rutgers 2
Complete Rankings »
USA Today Poll
RK TEAM RECORD PTS
1 LSU (60) 12-2 1500
2 USC 11-2 1380
3 Georgia 11-2 1370
4 Ohio State 11-2 1287
5 Missouri 12-2 1241
6 West Virginia 11-2 1239
7 Kansas 12-1 1217
8 Oklahoma 11-3 1016
9 Virginia Tech 11-3 979
10 Texas 10-3 924
11 Boston College 11-3 898
12 Tennessee 10-4 826
13 Arizona State 10-3 635
14 Auburn 9-4 624
14 Brigham Young 11-2 624
16 Florida 9-4 567
17 Hawaii 12-1 427
18 Illinois 9-4 416
19 Michigan 9-4 413
20 Cincinnati 10-3 376
21 Wisconsin 9-4 333
22 Clemson 9-4 319
23 Texas Tech 9-4 242
24 Oregon 9-4 192
25 Penn State 9-4 127
Others receiving votes: Oregon State 108, Virginia 71, Wake Forest 53, Boise State 33, Fresno State 11, Kentucky 11, California 8, Connecticut 8, Mississippi State 7, South Florida 6, Tulsa 5, UCF 4, Utah 2, Arkansas 1
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:41 am to PPeterson1
In 2007 Georgia and Southern Cal were co-runner-ups.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 8:02 am to tigerburningbright75
quote:Not according to the poll above, and i was just pointing out the duck fan was wrong. SC wasnt AP Champs in 07.
In 2007 Georgia and Southern Cal were co-runner-ups.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 8:13 am to DucksflyinPAC
This may be Germans. If it is, don't really care.
Pac 12 is 47-85-8 vs SEC. Get off our board
Pac 12 is 47-85-8 vs SEC. Get off our board
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:02 am to Kingpin
Posted on 8/13/11 at 10:12 am to emanresu
quote:
1. century = 100 years, not 14
2. head-to-head (1910-2010) between SEC teams and 2010 Pac-10 teams: SEC has won 60.8% of games
3. The SEC boasts the highest Win% against the Pac-10 of all other conferences that have ever existed. LINK. Roughly translated, this means that we fricking own you.
4. Only Arkansas, Moo St., and Vandy have a losing record against the Pac-10. (same link as 2)
5. Arizona, Arizona St., Cal, Oregon, Oregon St, Washington, and Washington St. have a losing record against the SEC (with UCLA at .500). (same as link 3)
6. I don't understand why you posted the first set of records when the second set included all stats present in the first.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 11:31 am to DucksflyinPAC
what's the latest?
alll i know its 21 days to a beat down on the ducks in dallas.
it seems like the troll took select games that when the SEC did in fact lose to the Pac-10. I always thought we had the Pac 10's number. I have been to all the LSU games vs the Pac-10 since 79 and I recall us only losing one of them and that was USC in 79 which we should have won. We beat Washington twice during that time frame, arizona twice, ASU, OSU, and pretty soon Oregon.
alll i know its 21 days to a beat down on the ducks in dallas.
it seems like the troll took select games that when the SEC did in fact lose to the Pac-10. I always thought we had the Pac 10's number. I have been to all the LSU games vs the Pac-10 since 79 and I recall us only losing one of them and that was USC in 79 which we should have won. We beat Washington twice during that time frame, arizona twice, ASU, OSU, and pretty soon Oregon.
This post was edited on 8/13/11 at 11:35 am
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:23 pm to DucksflyinPAC
Well, I was actually reading this until I decided i really don't give a frick. But one thing did catch my eye...
Auburn played like shite. Seriously, Auburn played like shite and still won.
quote:
Of course not, why would I be? AU played a great game and did beat us by 3 points in a game winning field goal. AU played us well and deserve the credit they got for winning.
Auburn played like shite. Seriously, Auburn played like shite and still won.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:39 pm to MsGarrison
the pac 10 is far and away the best conference after the sec, and is pretty damn close to the sec.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:40 pm to AU03ALUM
quote:really? Oregon had nothing to do with AU playing like shite huh? got it.
Auburn played like shite. Seriously, Auburn played like shite and still won.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:41 pm to dreaux
quote:
the pac 10 is far and away the best conference after the sec
They just now got this distinction with the falling apart of the Big 12. I think the PAC 10 is closer to the Big 10 than the SEC.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 12:46 pm to gatorprincess815
quote:It's fun here, GP. Besides, the conference expansion stuff is changing the landscape of CF for everyone. If A&M goes, who's next?
What is with all these out of conference fans on this board?
Will OU and oSu go to the PAC 12? Will Texas Tech and Baylor follow?
This is all good stuff. Usually, all we have to talk about is 2003 LSU vs. USC this time of year. This is a much better subject.
Page 16 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News