Started By
Message
re: Tiffin over Walsh?
Posted on 12/7/09 at 10:47 pm to adammwilson
Posted on 12/7/09 at 10:47 pm to adammwilson
quote:
wat a homer
are you calling me a homer?
...
0
Posted on 12/7/09 at 10:49 pm to Naturally Nawlins
Of course the likelihood of misses is going to go up with the amount of attempts, 29/33 and 19/21 is kind of meh, pretty similar, both excellent.
If you want to give it to Walsh for the extra points, fine, have no problem with that. Its good for Tiffin, but in the end not a big deal to me if they had given it to Walsh.
If you want to give it to Walsh for the extra points, fine, have no problem with that. Its good for Tiffin, but in the end not a big deal to me if they had given it to Walsh.
This post was edited on 12/7/09 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 12/7/09 at 11:56 pm to Crede15
I think walsh was 4/5 from 50+ yards.
How was tiffin?
Again...I'm not complaining...I just think Walsh deserved it more than Tiffin.
Then again, I am a UGA fan. :)
How was tiffin?
Again...I'm not complaining...I just think Walsh deserved it more than Tiffin.
Then again, I am a UGA fan. :)
Posted on 12/8/09 at 12:02 am to SoGaFan
quote:
Tiffin missed PATs ( as in more than one). I think missing one PAT should automatically disqualify any kicker from any recognition at this level or beyond. Other than that, Walsh was 19 of 21 with misses from 38 and 55 yards. Tiffin was 29-33 with misses from 36, 39, 43 and 49. Walsh was 4 for 5 from >50 yards. Walsh also had a far greater touchback percentage ( 25 to 15) even though he was having to kickoff short half the time due to UGA's imcomprehensible kick coverage strategy.
Basically, Rex Robinson was right; this was a lazy pick. Bama was a better team with a less efficient red zone offense and a less TO-prone QB so Tiffin gets the postseason recognition.
I agree with you but i think it probably had more to do with critical timing of the kicks made, and i believe Tiffin had alot of those. Dont forget we won lots of games off nothing but field goal kicks, i remember because we could not buy our way into the endzone at mid to late season
This post was edited on 12/8/09 at 12:03 am
Posted on 12/8/09 at 8:07 am to TiMe4bAmA8
FIELD GOALS G Made-Att Pct.
1. Auburn 12 14-15 .933
2. Georgia 12 19-21 .905
3. Alabama 13 29-34 .853
4. South Carolina 12 17-20 .850
5. LSU 12 16-19 .842
6. Ole Miss 12 15-18 .833
7. Vanderbilt 12 16-21 .762
Miss. State 12 16-21 .762
9. Arkansas 12 14-19 .737
10. Florida 13 21-29 .724
11. Kentucky 12 9-14 .643
12. Tennessee 12 13-21 .619
PAT KICKING G Made-Att Pct.
1. Auburn 12 49-49 1.000
Georgia 12 37-37 1.000
Miss. State 12 35-35 1.000
Vanderbilt 12 20-20 1.000
5. Tennessee 12 44-45 .978
6. LSU 12 32-33 .970
7. Arkansas 12 56-58 .966
8. Kentucky 12 39-41 .951
9. Ole Miss 12 42-45 .933
South Carolina 12 28-30 .933
11. Florida 13 52-56 .929
Alabama 13 39-42 .929
1. Auburn 12 14-15 .933
2. Georgia 12 19-21 .905
3. Alabama 13 29-34 .853
4. South Carolina 12 17-20 .850
5. LSU 12 16-19 .842
6. Ole Miss 12 15-18 .833
7. Vanderbilt 12 16-21 .762
Miss. State 12 16-21 .762
9. Arkansas 12 14-19 .737
10. Florida 13 21-29 .724
11. Kentucky 12 9-14 .643
12. Tennessee 12 13-21 .619
PAT KICKING G Made-Att Pct.
1. Auburn 12 49-49 1.000
Georgia 12 37-37 1.000
Miss. State 12 35-35 1.000
Vanderbilt 12 20-20 1.000
5. Tennessee 12 44-45 .978
6. LSU 12 32-33 .970
7. Arkansas 12 56-58 .966
8. Kentucky 12 39-41 .951
9. Ole Miss 12 42-45 .933
South Carolina 12 28-30 .933
11. Florida 13 52-56 .929
Alabama 13 39-42 .929
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News