Started By
Message

re: This can't be right... MSU SoS is 126?

Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:53 pm to
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
72710 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Your reality is your AD scheduled Texas when there is zero benefit from playing them. Your next dose of reality will come in about 6 weeks when we break it off in your arse for the 4th straight year.


A) FIFY

B) What has made you think State is light years ahead of us and that we are a guaranteed win?
Posted by Rox
Member since Oct 2010
33333 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:53 pm to
quote:


MSU is pound for pound the dumbest group of posters on here.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39545 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:54 pm to
No, I didn't.
Posted by OPR
NOLA
Member since Sep 2009
2606 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Here is the reality. We got zero freaking benefit from having the number 1 SoS 3 years ago. Had we had a easier schedule we go bowling that year. We got little benefit from having a Top 20 SoS 2 years ago. So, finally we have a schedule that is a cake walk and we benefit from it. That is reality. Talk to us about our SoS in 4 weaks. We will have some losses, but at least we had a chance to develop some young players, and build some confidence before facing Bama and LSU. The only people that give a shite about strength of schedule are those pissed that we are 6-0. If you dicks had an easier schedule and were undefeated you would be crowing too.

Your reality is your AD scheduled Texas when there is zero benefit from playing them. Your next does of reality will come in about 6 weeks when we break it off in your arse for the 4th straight year.



Completely agree with everything in this post. Seriously.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
117283 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:55 pm to
Auburn gave up weeks ago. John L. beat them for shits sake.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
72710 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

We beat UT by a simliar margin to Florida and Georgia.


And we beat Auburn by more points than y'all. So by that logic OM>State.

Transitive property is not a legitimate argument.
Posted by schlow mo
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2010
5245 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

What has made you think State is light years ahead of us and that we are a guaranteed win?


3 years in a row and we are undefeated right now, you have 3 losses with one being to a mediocre Texas team.

I am sure yall thought the same shite 3 years ago before the raping ensued. If we lose this year I will eat crow.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
117283 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:55 pm to
"I give up the right to call anyone dumb after making an arse of myself."

"We're so beating texas."

-rebelgator
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
69339 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:56 pm to
Dooley gave up weeks ago....


And Arkansas looked much better against Kentucky than MSU did.


So Arkansas > MSU?
Posted by pivey14
In Your Head
Member since Mar 2012
15445 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

The rest of them can go drink battery acid.


Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
35728 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

The only people that give a shite about strength of schedule are those pissed that we are 6-0.



who is mad you are 6-0 the reality is as you say, you won't have that 0 for long so I don't think anyone is that upset about it.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
60836 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

MSU is pound for pound the dumbest group of posters on here.


Well if you didn't weigh a buck twenty-five IRL, you would push ole miss over the edge.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
72710 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

MSU is pound for pound the dumbest group of posters on here.


They aren't bad people and I understand that they are excited. But to say they would beat Texas by 20 just because Oklahoma beat their arse is stupid.
Posted by engie
Member since Jan 2012
8953 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Our victories are just as impressive as y'alls.

No, they aren't...

quote:

The best team that State has beaten is a 3-3 (0-3) Tennessee team.

That will finish 7-5(3-5) and win a bowl game. That is a top 30 team. Downplay it however you like.

quote:

Who has State beaten that would make you believe they could hang with or beat Bama?

Where did anyone say this? I believe we can hang with them because we did last year for the first 3+ quarters, when we were almost completely one dimensional.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39545 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:57 pm to
Antifreeze?
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
117283 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Transitive property is not a legitimate argument.


Not always but all three games vs. UTenn played out in similiar fashion. Auburn was only down 7 to you guys with 5 minutes left. We had them done by the end of the 3rd.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
117283 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:57 pm to
We wouldn't beat texas by 20 but we'd beat them. They wouldn't put 66 or near that on us.
Posted by OPR
NOLA
Member since Sep 2009
2606 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Auburn gave up weeks ago. John L. beat them for shits sake.


Wrong. We got Auburns best effort of the season last Saturday. Certainly, one helluva better effort than you got. And we still beat them by more than you did...
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39545 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

They aren't bad people


Debatable
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
72710 posts
Posted on 10/16/12 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

3 years in a row


Has no effect on this year.

quote:

we are undefeated right now, you have 3 losses with one being to a mediocre Texas team.


I can understand that argument. But we are a completely different team than we were against Texas. If we played again we wouldn't win but it would be a 2-3 td game.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter