Started By
Message
re: The WSJ take on the bottle-throwing incident
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:13 pm to TexasOnTop
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:13 pm to TexasOnTop
0
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:13 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
there's a rule for defensive backs: if you feel you are beat, you chase and don't look back, if you feel you have proper coverage, you turn and look for the ball - the decision making process is judged in milliseconds
Yes and when the receivers eyes get wide you’re supposed to turn around… what you’re not supposed to do is run into them
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:15 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
You can’t run into a receiver without making a play on the ball
again, for the 6th time, if the WR causes the collision by slowing down, the collision is not the fault of the defender!
holy shite your'e fricking stupid
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:15 pm to FootballFrenzy
I’m surprised the Longhorn fans didn’t throw their dildos on the field
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:18 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
again, for the 6th time, if the WR causes the collision by slowing down, the collision is not the fault of the defender!
The WR is slowing down to play the ball. The DB is beat in coverage and is not playing the ball. Therefor it’s a PI.
I don’t think you ever played or pay attention when you watch, because most 10 year olds know this. It’s why DB coaches teach to tackle a WR when you’re beat like this because a 15 yard penalty is better than a 40 yard gain.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:19 pm to TexasOnTop
once again, you post a video showing legit pass interference
and you think that proves your point here
you're a pathological liar!
and you think that proves your point here
you're a pathological liar!
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:20 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
again, for the 6th time, if the WR causes the collision by slowing down, the collision is not the fault of the defender!
This is what happened with the Missouri/A&M PI, which was the right no-call IMO.
Dunno what's so hard to understand about that.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:21 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
once again, you post a video showing legit pass interference
Because rule 1 is the defender must play the ball…. Jfc you gotta be drunk
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:24 pm to TexasOnTop
ZERO of the plays in that video are anywhere close to the call we are talking about with the Texas WR and UGA DB
For the...7th time?...you're a pathological liar
you're showing videos that show defensive pass interference
they aren't anywhere close to the topic at hand
For the...7th time?...you're a pathological liar
you're showing videos that show defensive pass interference
they aren't anywhere close to the topic at hand
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:25 pm to bluestem75
quote:
I don’t believe that for a second. The more I watch it, the more I think DPI was the right call. The defender initiated contact then moves the receiver aside and interrupts his ability to turn back to run his route.
It might be ticky-tack, but they made contact and the receivers path to run his route was impeded. I’ve seen worse called and more egregious not called.
Your bias is showing; the receiver never had his head turned to the ball. That play was all Texas' DB making his uncontested play on the INT.
Texas fans may be villified for the stoppage in play (eventually getting to the review) but all fans of modern football should take notice when officiating gets in the way of a decisive play. It wouldn't have made a difference in the outcome of this game, but we are usually told to "shut up and take it" with zero accountability from officials. It could be your team affected down the line.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:27 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
THE DEFENDER MUST PLAY THE BALL IF THEY ARE MAKING CONTACT.
The UGA player DID NOT MAKE CONTACT
the Texas player did, BY SLOWING DOWN
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:28 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
You said the defender doesn’t have to make a play/ play the ball. Rule 1 is you have to play the ball.
You can’t just run into a receiver who is playing the ball because you got beat and aren’t playing it. That’s pass interference and is called every time.
You can’t just run into a receiver who is playing the ball because you got beat and aren’t playing it. That’s pass interference and is called every time.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:30 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
Yes and when the receivers eyes get wide you’re supposed to turn around… what you’re not supposed to do is run into them
No, dumbass, if they slow down on a dime, they get run into
Go chow down 3 bags of Cheetos now
you might be the most hardheaded idiot of 2024 on SECRANT
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:30 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
The UGA player DID NOT MAKE CONTACT the Texas player did, BY SLOWING DOWN
Yes the UGA defender did make contact.
Second, the Texas WR is playing the ball… if the UGA defender was playing the ball he would not have ran into him.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:30 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
ZERO of the plays in that video are anywhere close to the call we are talking about with the Texas WR and UGA DB
Frustrating we have to go back to your original reply to track the right discussion but you're right. Nothing to do with the call we're talking about and that certainly wasn't OPI.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:31 pm to Old Sarge
Just waiting for the hillbilly fans of Tennessee to chime in.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:31 pm to FootballFrenzy
Garbage in, garbage out.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:31 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
No, dumbass, if they slow down on a dime, they get run into
Which is why QB’s love throwing these balls. It’s either completed or odds are it’s a PI.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:32 pm to TexasOnTop
I played
defensive back
it's you who never played
Posted on 10/21/24 at 7:34 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
This is what happened with the Missouri/A&M PI, which was the right no-call IMO.
Yes sir, correct
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News