Started By
Message

re: The QWilliams targeting no call deserves billboard action.

Posted on 12/30/18 at 3:03 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
109978 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 3:03 pm to
According to the rules, and what they have called all year it should have been

1. Targeting-Bama
2. Roughing the passer- bama
3. Unnecessary roughness -Oklahoma

Offsetting penalties
Posted by Gustave
Member since Nov 2015
3393 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

According to the rules, and what they have called all year it should have been 

1. Targeting-Bama 
2. Roughing the passer- bama 
3. Unnecessary roughness -Oklahoma 

Offsetting penalties


If it's 1 and 2 both are ejected. If it's 2 and 3 only 75 for OU is ejected( second personal )
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
109978 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 3:05 pm to
Ok. The Oklahoma player absolutely should have been penalized and ejected
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23194 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

We've branched out to the ACC refs cheat for Bama now?


You'd expect this from the inbreds in Baton Rouge, but now they've got the barners in on it as well.

These guys cry some real pussy tears.
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

According to the rules, and what they have called all year it should have been

1. Targeting-Bama
2. Roughing the passer- bama
3. Unnecessary roughness -Oklahoma

Offsetting penalties

Based on what they called all year, including White, I agree on 1 and 3. You'll have to explain the roughing shite. He didn't land on Cryler.

For the record, the White call was bullshite. He was just playing football and did not intend to "target" Fitz. We had way more bullshite targeting calls on us than LSU, so I get it.
This post was edited on 12/30/18 at 3:09 pm
Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
9984 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

He launched


if Q had launched, murray would be in the hospital
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 3:50 pm to
quote:


quote:

What targeting

Same targeting as this play



The sec office made it clear if fscemasks touch at all on a defenseless player targeting should be called and upheld

Yes, that was a bullshite call. White was just being his baller self.

This one probably cost us the Clemson game:

Wilson ejecting for Targeting

ETA: They deleted the video. See here:

LINK
This post was edited on 12/30/18 at 3:53 pm
Posted by 4Ghost
Member since Sep 2016
8565 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 3:57 pm to
75 should have been flagged and tossed from game after thar play. Was his 2nd personal and they let it go. Phuccking bitch arse pussy fans complaining about Bama.
Posted by bengalfan50
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2009
2690 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 4:01 pm to
Contact with the face mask is not targeting and is actually being taught as the correct method of tackling "seeing what you hit"
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
28947 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 4:33 pm to
quote:


According to the rules, and what they have called all year it should have been

1. Targeting-Bama
2. Roughing the passer- bama




quote:

lsupride87



This wasn't even remotely targeting. You've confirmed in earlier threads that you're an idiot. You don't have to continue to reaffirm the point.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
28947 posts
Posted on 12/30/18 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

He launched himself, leading with the helmet, and made contact.

That's the definition of targeting




His feet are on the damn ground when he hit him, moron.
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter