Started By
Message

The Nick Saban "have to win your conference" meme got so out of hand AL.com wrote about it

Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:12 pm
Posted by GIbson05
Member since Feb 2009
4292 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:12 pm
LINK



The problem is, like many memes and Internet jokes, it is based in partial truth and accuracy only to conform to the purpose or intent of the overall message.

Question: Do you think being conference champion should trump anything else on a resume for playoff consideration?

Answer: "I think I could answer the question better if you gave me a specific scenario. I think that being a conference champ is certainly a significant accomplishment for any team or any program.

"I also think that sometimes there are circumstances that a team can play really, really well for an entire season, and are we basing the playoff on the whole body of work that a team does throughout the year in terms of all the teams they've beat, the quality opponents they played against, or is it just about one game? And when you talk about conference championships, if you play a conference championship some leagues don't even have conference championships. So, it's not sort of a fair and equitable way to base that particular group that didn't play a conference championship, so you're doing the whole body of work. Then it seems a little more reasonable to look at everyone else's entire body or work when you decide who the best teams are.

"Hey, we won a national championship here and didn't win the SEC. I mean, I think, in that particular year, LSU and Alabama had the two best teams, so we had to play in the regular season. We played 9-6. Forty-two guys, somebody wrote an article, played in the NFL that played on the field that day. So, they were two really, really good teams. Well, both teams in the same division couldn't go to the conference championship. So, we end up playing in the championship game. So is that the right thing or the wrong thing? I'm sure everybody could debate that. But, I believe those were the two best teams. So, it depends on what that goal is."
Posted by TiderNAL
Member since Nov 2010
7187 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:15 pm to
Was the other thread with 9 pages insufficient for this?
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46552 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

Was the other thread with 9 pages insufficient for this?



Yes.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34862 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:17 pm to
Wow. This really upset you.
Posted by GIbson05
Member since Feb 2009
4292 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Was the other thread with 9 pages insufficient for this?

The other thread passed it off a he did say that. Which was the whole purpose of this thread to address he never said that.
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
28897 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:17 pm to
bammers




Posted by Fear The Thumb
Coastal, AL
Member since Nov 2012
3368 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:18 pm to
Melt on Bammers.
Posted by LSUlax17
Member since Jun 2014
745 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:18 pm to
Getting so mad about a meme you have to write an article about it

Insecure U strikes again
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16991 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:18 pm to
You don't win your conference, this means automatically you're not the best team ON THE FIELD. Alabama did not win their conference.

What Saban and others are doing is arguing that teams should be admitted to the play-offs based on PAPER. Football is not played on paper, otherwise we would just give the NC to bama every year (since they are #1 in recruiting every year). Why play the game at all if you're just gonna award people championships based on paper?
Posted by Kcoyote
Member since Jan 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:20 pm to
Man it would be funny to play auburn again in the playoffs. Give them the LSU treatment
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54025 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:20 pm to
Kiffin'd their arse
Posted by GIbson05
Member since Feb 2009
4292 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

means automatically you're not the best team ON THE FIELD.

Auburn wasn't the best team on the field TWICE this year. Think they still deserve to be in?
Posted by Dawgholio
Bugtussle
Member since Oct 2015
13047 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:21 pm to
That’s a lot of typing for me not to read
Posted by FinebaumsHair
Monroe, La
Member since Aug 2017
3001 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:21 pm to
Is this fresh off the Düsseldorf al.com wire?
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46552 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

You don't win your conference, this means automatically you're not the best team ON THE FIELD. Alabama did not win their conference.


Is that right? So OSU will have proven they’re the best team “ON THE FIELD” with their 31 point loss to an unranked team just a few weeks ago?

Makes so much sense.
Posted by Mizzou4ever
Kansas City, Mo
Member since Nov 2011
15229 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:24 pm to
Auburn would kick Bamas arse again and I have no dog in this fight.
Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
5975 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:34 pm to
Melt away you pieces of shite.

Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46552 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Melt away you pieces of shite.


21-0.
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15375 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

You don't win your conference, this means automatically you're not the best team ON THE FIELD. Alabama did not win their conference.



Correct. No one is arguing Bama is the best team on the field. Just one of the four best on the field

quote:

What Saban and others are doing is arguing that teams should be admitted to the play-offs based on PAPER.


No he is saying base it on the entire body of work

quote:

Football is not played on paper,


Right. He is saying base it on their accomplishments on the field

quote:

Why play the game at all if you're just gonna award people championships based on paper?


Who is awarding Bama a championship?



Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16991 posts
Posted on 11/28/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Is that right? So OSU will have proven they’re the best team “ON THE FIELD” with their 31 point loss to an unranked team just a few weeks ago?


Not sure what you're arguing. This has nothing to do with OSU.

All conferences have a system setup to determine conference champs. Two divisions, with the two teams with the best records facing off in a championship game. This is the system the SEC started and all other conferences agreed to adopt. It makes ZERO logical sense to say you didn't win your conference but deserve to play for the national title.

Either do away with conference titles or accept that if you don't win your conference you do not deserve to get in. Yes it sucks that some conferences are much weaker and therefore will have worse teams get in, but it is what it is. No matter how you arrange conferences, there's always gonna be weak divisions/conferences. The NFL has much more parity across divisions than CFB has between conferences. It isn't fair, but I prefer the game to be won on the field, not on paper or in recruiting rankings.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter