Started By
Message

re: the least classy sec fans.

Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:27 pm to
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:27 pm to
they are picking up to what they used to be.
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
25725 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:30 pm to
Wouldnt that be considered breeding that is not evolution, I understand that dogs and wolves are in the same genus or species whatever but different breeds are the result of breeding a poodle doesnt suddenly become a german Sheppard. That is not the same as evolution. I saw the missing link thing on discovery but how do y ou not know that that is a direct descendant of man even the article said it was not a direct descendant of man.
Posted by FootballHog
Member since Nov 2006
7694 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

labamafan


Not trying to be a douche, but do honestly believe everything the bible says?
Posted by LSU Yellow Cab
Member since Aug 2009
1743 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:31 pm to
Would this be considered a Thunderdome?
Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36408 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Wouldnt that be considered breeding that is not evolution, I understand that dogs and wolves are in the same genus or species whatever but different breeds are the result of breeding a poodle doesnt suddenly become a german Sheppard.


That is evolution you dolt. It is gradual. We've had some hundreds of millions of years of life on Earth. Evolution doesn't happen over night. BTW, do you understand how DNA is replicated? Stuff like mutations and what not? If not, you have no business arguing this.

quote:

I saw the missing link thing on discovery but how do y ou not know that that is a direct descendant of man even the article said it was not a direct descendant of man.


It was a relative. Just because we don't have a physical missing link doesn't mean it's not there. Let's talk about vitamin C for a second. Most animals just make the stuff. It's based off of six different proteins made in the liver of animals. Well humans and chimps (our closest ancestor) can't. Here's the kicker, we have five of the six proteins. The sixth protein isn't made because of a mutation in the DNA that produces it. We have the same mutation. The exact same places are "messed up" on the gene, and it's comprised of six different base changes. You're trying to tell me two different unrelated species have the same exact error in the same exact place?
This post was edited on 8/23/09 at 5:41 pm
Posted by inelishaitrust
Oxford, MS
Member since Jan 2008
26140 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

Wouldnt that be considered breeding that is not evolution

Breeding is evolution.

quote:

saw the missing link thing on discovery but how do y ou not know that that is a direct descendant of man even the article said it was not a direct descendant of man.

It sounds a lot more logical than talking snakes and bushes, Or that every species of animal lived within walking distance of Noah's ark. Or that Noah could build an arch big enough to hold two of every known and unknown species in the world today, and enough food for all of those animals, and himself for Months.

Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36408 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

I mean how can you completely dismiss creationism?


There's an amazing amount of scientific evidence of evolution and none of creationism may be the reason.
Posted by inelishaitrust
Oxford, MS
Member since Jan 2008
26140 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

You're trying to tell me two different unrelated species have the same exact error in the same exact place?

If God made us in his image and perfect, Why do we even have an error?
Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36408 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

If God made us in his image and perfect, Why do we even have an error?


Really. The designer made a ton of mistakes a long the way. Look at all the extinction. Doesn't seem all that intelligent to me.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:45 pm to
the designer had to much wine while he was creating shite
Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36408 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

the designer had to much wine while he was creating shite


Did he stay tanked for the last 300 million years?
Posted by WestEndVol
Nashville, Tennessee
Member since Aug 2009
1821 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:47 pm to
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:47 pm to
yea pretty much.
Posted by CatFan81
Decatur, GA
Member since May 2009
47188 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

yall have kige though so it sets yall back some


Damn. I guess you got me there.
Posted by LSUownsSEC
OutOfTheArea
Member since May 2008
3178 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:50 pm to
blowhardbammers
Auburn Fan
birmingham
Member since Aug 2009
42 posts

the least classy sec fans.

Now there is one!
Posted by inelishaitrust
Oxford, MS
Member since Jan 2008
26140 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

none of creationism may be the reason.

The written word from 4,000 years is as much as some people need.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:54 pm to
"the missing link" doesn't really prove much. Coulda been a genetically singular occurance, much like this person:




Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:55 pm to
look at the people that wrote the word and see how trustworthy they are
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:55 pm to
hunter always gotta take a shot at the auburn fans
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
25725 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

So the world being flat and the world being round are equals?


I am not sure what your point is? But Gravity and the shape of the earth were proven scientifically and neither were biblical statements but please dont confuse white superiority with anything in the Bible. That is not a Christian principle at all and never has been. Just because someone does something in the name of being a :christian" white male does not mean thatis a true representation of Christian beliefs. I think you are trying to say those things were Christian beliefs and were proven to be wrong and i agree the church was wrong but nowhere in the bible did it say the earth was flat and the earth was the center of the universe. The church presented that because they were the only ones that were allowed to be educated is that not correct?
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter