Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M vs lsu 74-72
Posted on 3/20/19 at 7:53 pm to texag7
Posted on 3/20/19 at 7:53 pm to texag7
Daniel, you can't handle a debate, don't get into one, and you won't get stomped this hard in the future. At the very least, pick one of our many dumbass lsu fans to debate with like the moron above me, instead of me. Enjoy your loss as you didn't make a single point besides mindless shite talk and proved every point I made correct.
1
Posted on 3/20/19 at 7:53 pm to Bamax
Posted on 3/20/19 at 8:44 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
I mean here you're saying that LSU and Bama aren't rivals and we play every season.
For 80% of it's existence as a football team, LSU was basically Alabama's homecoming game.
Alabama and LSU have never been rivals and we aren't now. Playing each other every year does not make a rivalry.
A football coach leaving an NFL team and choosing to coach Alabama does not make LSU a rival of Alabama either.
Alabama and Auburn are rivals due to decades and decades and decades of fierce, deadly competition and by virtue of being located in the same state.
Alabama and Tennessee are rivals, again, due to decades and decades and decades of brutal competition with many memorable games.
Just as Tennessee are still Alabama's rivals, even though they have fallen precipitously over the last decade or so, there is still that storied history to bind the programs and fan-bases together in a way.
Alabama and LSU have none of this. For Alabama, LSU has been a ridiculously non-competitive team with a fan-base that has no cultural ties or shared history with Alabama.
"Because Saban" does not = Rivalry. Tulane was LSU's rival; they don't have one now if they don't still claim Tulane as one.
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 3/20/19 at 8:51 pm to Bamax
quote:
Tulane was LSU's rival; they don't have one now.
Which is exactly what I said from the get go. You were the one that suggested that Tulane was LSU's rival and that they stopped in '09. I simply used your own logic against you. I'm glad to see that we agree on all counts. LSU and Bama are absolutely not rivals and I never suggested that they were. In fact, I said I hope that LSU and A&M could become rivals because we don't have one and you came in talking about LSU and Saban and rivalries with Bama. I never brought that up at all.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 8:56 pm to PensaTigers
quote:
Daniel, you can't handle a debate, don't get into one, and you won't get stomped this hard in the future. At the very least, pick one of our many dumbass lsu fans to debate with like the moron above me, instead of me. Enjoy your loss as you didn't make a single point besides mindless shite talk and proved every point I made correct.
Stop proclaiming yourself the victor; that doesn't automatically make you the winner.
Just like saying that the refs collectively decided, with the approval of the SEC Headquarters, to gift A&M with a win over LSU to "save the children" is moronic, you saying you have won is equally moronic.
You've done nothing but make a fool out of yourself and shown yourself to be unable to accept adversity, or reality, due to having bad parents that didn't know how to raise you.
In other words, you are the typical LSU fan. Congrats on winning that distinction anyway.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:07 pm to Bamax
Let's me explain to you how a debate works. One person supports their idea with points, another person does the same and they refute and debate their points. You know when you win a debate?
When the other person fails to refute anything you've said, doesn't address even a single point you've made, and instead just makes a baseless insult.
That's why I'm the victor. I've debated my points and both you and Daniel have failed to counter them. Now you're continuing to get embarrassed by engaging with someone smarter than you.
When all you've got to say is "your points are stupid, you're an idiot, that's all"
You've. Lost.
When the other person fails to refute anything you've said, doesn't address even a single point you've made, and instead just makes a baseless insult.
That's why I'm the victor. I've debated my points and both you and Daniel have failed to counter them. Now you're continuing to get embarrassed by engaging with someone smarter than you.
When all you've got to say is "your points are stupid, you're an idiot, that's all"
You've. Lost.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:09 pm to Bamax
Also I never said all the refs collectively decided to throw nor received permission from the sec office. The sec office came right out and said the final call was a bad one. Nor did I say their only reason was to prevent further injuries.
What you're actually doing is a list of common debate tactics for people who are losing miserably: rewording, falsifying, insulting while and dodging points.
You're bad at this.
What you're actually doing is a list of common debate tactics for people who are losing miserably: rewording, falsifying, insulting while and dodging points.
You're bad at this.
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 9:11 pm
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:10 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Which is exactly what I said from the get go. You were the one that suggested that Tulane was LSU's rival and that they stopped in '09. I simply used your own logic against you. I'm glad to see that we agree on all counts.
No, we don't quite agree on all counts. I assert that Tulane's rivalry ended with LSU in 2009, you know, when the actual games ended.
You claim a year you pulled out of thin air, 1969, as the year when the rivalry ended. Tulane beat LSU three out of four seasons from '79-'82; was it still not a rivalry then?
The rivalry ended in '09, period, not when you decide.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:15 pm to PensaTigers
quote:
Let's me explain to you how a debate works. One person supports their idea with points, another person does the same and they refute and debate their points. You know when you win a debate?
When the other person fails to refute anything you've said, doesn't address even a single point you've made, and instead just makes a baseless insult.
That's why I'm the victor. I've debated my points and both you and Daniel have failed to counter them. Now you're continuing to get embarrassed by engaging with someone smarter than you.
When all you've got to say is "your points are stupid, you're an idiot, that's all"
You've. Lost.
The only thing you know about a debate is how to spell the word, which is a great achievement for you.
A debate is not venturing into insanity and slobbering out "debate points" about how all the refs got together and decided that for the health of the small children playing the game, they were going to simply award A&M the victory.
One doesn't have to refute that to win a debate. Someone automatically loses a debate when they are clinically insane and don't offer any sensible arguments or counterpoints.
Me: I think the moon is round.
You: Purple jelly grows like mud in butter.
That isn't really a debate; that is just your insanity and I can't logically refute it but, it doesn't make you a winner. Understand?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:17 pm to Bamax
A cousin of tua... Who gives a frick, like that's some kind of special thing
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:19 pm to Bamax
Jesus Christ. Really?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:23 pm to Bamax
quote:
. I assert that Tulane's rivalry ended with LSU in 2009, you know, when the actual games ended.
Accept you were saying in your first post to me that Bama wasn't a rival now instead of Tulane inferring that Tulane is currently a rival. Then you said...
quote:
For 80% of it's existence as a football team, LSU was basically Alabama's homecoming game.
LSU had Tulane for homecoming as well because they weren't competitive.
quote:
You claim a year you pulled out of thin air, 1969, as the year when the rivalry ended.
No I told you that was am approximation because it's been so long since it was a rivalry.
quote:
Tulane beat LSU three out of four seasons from '79-'82
You're all over the place here. You're saying that Tulane beat LSU 3 out of 4 seasons in the early 80s and they played in '09 so that's a rivalry even though we didn't play every season and Tulane isn't a competitive football program in decades. Yet your also saying that LSU is not a rival to Bama because LSU isn't competive and we do play every year. By your definition of Tulane and LSU being rivals, then LSU and Bama should be bitter rivals. You are 100% being hypocrtitical and arguing against yourself. Take your medicine and go home. You're getting obliterated here.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:28 pm to Bamax
First I want you to answer this. Why do you fail in reading comprehension? I just got done pointing out that I never said the refs got together and made a collective decision.
Everyone point and laugh, a Gump can't read and insults others intelligence in the same breath. Typical as hell lol.
Now as for my point, I don't think any decision was made by anyone except the FINAL ref. There were a butt load of bad calls in OT, all going anms way, and I'd be glad to debate them. We won several times over in that aspect.
I believe the last call was a single ref, old asf, looking irritated as hell, fed up with how long this game was dragging on, and observed all the injuries stacking up, decided to just end the game there by throwing a flag before the play even developed assuring it didn't go into an 8th overtime, as this game wasn't deciding a playoff spot. Nothing about that is hard to believe, the flag was so blatantly bad that it was called out by the head representation of the sec. He then threw a flag on greedy for arguing it, which is just absurd. If you're only argument is that that completely logical line of thinking is insane, then you've clearly lost. Everything Ive said is reasonable human thought processes and actions.
Everyone point and laugh, a Gump can't read and insults others intelligence in the same breath. Typical as hell lol.
Now as for my point, I don't think any decision was made by anyone except the FINAL ref. There were a butt load of bad calls in OT, all going anms way, and I'd be glad to debate them. We won several times over in that aspect.
I believe the last call was a single ref, old asf, looking irritated as hell, fed up with how long this game was dragging on, and observed all the injuries stacking up, decided to just end the game there by throwing a flag before the play even developed assuring it didn't go into an 8th overtime, as this game wasn't deciding a playoff spot. Nothing about that is hard to believe, the flag was so blatantly bad that it was called out by the head representation of the sec. He then threw a flag on greedy for arguing it, which is just absurd. If you're only argument is that that completely logical line of thinking is insane, then you've clearly lost. Everything Ive said is reasonable human thought processes and actions.
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:31 pm to PensaTigers
Come on dude, you think the refs wanted to end the game?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:33 pm to Tigerpride18
Maybe, but we still could have won after that flag
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:34 pm to texag7
7 out of 8 aggot. You are Texas A&M.
A school with:
1 national championship in football
0 final four appearances
0 national championships in baseball
You are the definition of irrelevance.
A school with:
1 national championship in football
0 final four appearances
0 national championships in baseball
You are the definition of irrelevance.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:35 pm to Tigerpride18
I see you can't read like him.
No. One ref. And had he not thrown that flag, this game officially becomes the LONGEST GAME IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL HISTORY.
With players falling out left and right and nothing but meaningless bowl games riding on the outcome, which would hardly be effected by such a close game, yes. I do. But I have critical thinking skills, most people don't. I don't blame you for thinking the world is so black, white, and simplistic. You should go suck off Daniel a bit more and change your logo to AnM.
No. One ref. And had he not thrown that flag, this game officially becomes the LONGEST GAME IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL HISTORY.
With players falling out left and right and nothing but meaningless bowl games riding on the outcome, which would hardly be effected by such a close game, yes. I do. But I have critical thinking skills, most people don't. I don't blame you for thinking the world is so black, white, and simplistic. You should go suck off Daniel a bit more and change your logo to AnM.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:36 pm to Bamax
Be careful what you wish for tam could come back and bite you in the arse
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:37 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
You're all over the place here. You're saying that Tulane beat LSU 3 out of 4 seasons in the early 80s and they played in '09 so that's a rivalry even though we didn't play every season and Tulane isn't a competitive football program in decades.
Incorrect. I didn't state that LSU lost to Tulane 3 out four times from '79 to '82 and then played in '09.
I said LSU lost to Tulane 3 out 4 times from '79 to '82 and the rivalry ended in '09, when the series was called off.
quote:
Yet your also saying that LSU is not a rival to Bama because LSU isn't competive and we do play every year. By your definition of Tulane and LSU being rivals, then LSU and Bama should be bitter rivals. You are 100% being hypocrtitical and arguing against yourself.
Incorrect. Rivals are built up over time, not because a coach left the NFL to coach a college team. Just as Tulane wasn't competitive with LSU for a long, long time, they were still LSU's rival until 2009, not your ignorantly chosen date of 1969.
You know, just as Tennessee hasn't been competitive with Alabama in a long time, they are still Bama's rival.
Of course, if we discontinued the series with Tennessee, as LSU chose to do with Tulane, then it wouldn't be a rivalry any longer because, well, games aren't being played at all. Get it?
quote:
Take your medicine and go home. You're getting obliterated here.
You are responding to me under the fallacy, and it is a fallacy, that Alabama and LSU are rivals.
That has never been the case.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:38 pm to Tigerpride18
He threw a flag to put them right next to the line, he also could have thrown yet another flag if the play looked to be failing.
No one's answering this question: Why do you incels think this ref threw a pass interference on a play so early that it wasn't even possible for it to be, and when greedy didn't arm bar, push, or even barely touch his guy in coverage? A call so bad that the head representation of the sec called it a trash call, when they almost always cover their refs decisions, no matter how bad.
No one's answering this question: Why do you incels think this ref threw a pass interference on a play so early that it wasn't even possible for it to be, and when greedy didn't arm bar, push, or even barely touch his guy in coverage? A call so bad that the head representation of the sec called it a trash call, when they almost always cover their refs decisions, no matter how bad.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News