Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M doing Texas A&M things...
Posted on 9/12/25 at 6:08 am to Wolfhound45
Posted on 9/12/25 at 6:08 am to Wolfhound45
Hopefully Welsh is run off for covering this up and lying about it. He’s an undercover liberal
Posted on 9/12/25 at 9:03 am to AggieArchitect2004
The child likes his AI pictures. According to the player on the left, UTrans is still in the big 12. The middle guy, #14, is actually black instead of white.
Come on child! If you are going to cheat, at least be accurate.
Come on child! If you are going to cheat, at least be accurate.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 9:05 am to Buster83
quote:
Come on child! If you are going to cheat, at least be accurate.
That picture was after 2018 season when Texas won the Sugar Bowl against Georgia.
Damn you are one big, fat idiot.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 10:31 am to Nasty_Canasta
quote:
Oh sweet summer child
And this is why the southern Baptist brand of promoting and proselytizing different people comes off as pompous and superficial. Atheists want to be left the hell alone. Agnostics want to be left the hell alone. It’s not those groups that are trying to indoctrinate youngsters in schools. It is mainly the Tribe who shall not be named but as they are also children of God, they deserve the same amount of respect that we give to each other. Civility is always the first step. If civility fails, then boycotts are in order. If boycotts don’t work, then doxxing may help. If that don’t work, property damage may help. If that don’t work, then maybe some escalating tactics could do the trick
So, trying to speak with graciousness is now pompous and superficial? Seems like that reasoning is more reflective of your predisposition to the message than the instruction given to Christians. But your reaction is no different than what Christians encountered in 1 Cor 1:23. The cross has always offended human pride - and it still does.
The point of what I said — and what you seem to have missed — is that complete silence would actually be unloving. But that doesn’t mean coercing anyone who chooses to reject it. Many rejected Jesus himself, and Christians would be naïve to expect otherwise today. God has given each of us the freedom to accept or reject Him.
Referring to “the Tribe who shall not be named” as responsible for indoctrination is not only irrelevant to my point, it’s antisemitic scapegoating. And suggesting escalation from civility to doxxing or property damage moves far outside any good-faith discussion. That kind of rhetoric doesn’t strengthen your case; it only underscores why persuasion rooted in love is still so desperately needed.
Popular
Back to top

0






