UBamaJelly

Imagine being in the playoffs after playing the toughest schedule in the nation, and still feeling this bad about your team (assuming you are a legit fan and not a troll).

Bama just went on the road in the playoffs, got down 17 against a team that has given you trouble in prior meetings, and still had enough character as a team to pull it together and get a double digit win.

And you think "what does DeBoer bring to the table?" is a legitimate question?

Also, two of the top programs in the country have basically given him blank checks to coach their football programs. Considering that, and where the team currently is in year 2 should be enough for you to think twice about posting this garbage. Shoot, if you thought once you wouldn't have posted it.

Feeling ok, but not great. Statistically, we had a good game against OU last time and had a few catastrophic plays that really ended up costing us with turnovers and special teams coverage. Hoping we can avoid those and perhaps even get a few of our own.

But, they are now at home and healthier. Think it is going to be a brawl and that probably leans in their favor stylistically. Hoping we can get out to an early lead and put some stress on their offense to have to press.

quote:

---

Agree with the guy calling out Deboer and this board is full of sunshine pumpers

---

Then give him an upvote and quit making stupid threads.

CFP committee right now.

Well what did playing the toughest schedule get us? I think we are in the CFP, but the fact that it is even debatable is evidence enough to not make it tougher than it has to be. The committee said they would value strength of schedule and they reneged on that when they put ND ahead of bama when there is no comparison in what those two teams have accomplished.

quote:

---

A defensive front that’s straight-up soft

---

This is as far as I could make it into this moronic post. Disappointed I couldn't make it until the end, but I am proud of my performance.

Some of our fans are morons.

quote:

---

'm telling y'all, LSU got their shite together this week

---

What, like trying to pile it all up in a corner or something?

quote:

---

Why hasn’t Kiffin signed the extension?

---

Because he is too busy laughing at LSU like the rest of us.

Same thing happened to Alabama when it lost to FSU. They jumped to like 14 and Bama got crapped on for losing to the team that only had 2 wins last year.

quote:

---

Oh sweet summer child

And this is why the southern Baptist brand of promoting and proselytizing different people comes off as pompous and superficial. Atheists want to be left the hell alone. Agnostics want to be left the hell alone. It’s not those groups that are trying to indoctrinate youngsters in schools. It is mainly the Tribe who shall not be named but as they are also children of God, they deserve the same amount of respect that we give to each other. Civility is always the first step. If civility fails, then boycotts are in order. If boycotts don’t work, then doxxing may help. If that don’t work, property damage may help. If that don’t work, then maybe some escalating tactics could do the trick

---

So, trying to speak with graciousness is now pompous and superficial? Seems like that reasoning is more reflective of your predisposition to the message than the instruction given to Christians. But your reaction is no different than what Christians encountered in 1 Cor 1:23. The cross has always offended human pride - and it still does.

The point of what I said — and what you seem to have missed — is that complete silence would actually be unloving. But that doesn’t mean coercing anyone who chooses to reject it. Many rejected Jesus himself, and Christians would be naïve to expect otherwise today. God has given each of us the freedom to accept or reject Him.

Referring to “the Tribe who shall not be named” as responsible for indoctrination is not only irrelevant to my point, it’s antisemitic scapegoating. And suggesting escalation from civility to doxxing or property damage moves far outside any good-faith discussion. That kind of rhetoric doesn’t strengthen your case; it only underscores why persuasion rooted in love is still so desperately needed.