Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M assuming the W against LSU in Baton Rouge
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:24 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:24 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Agreed
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
OP a thread with this title is total and complete bullshite. No one assumes a win over lsu in football.
lsu has a good football team. Are the Aggies planning to bring the wood? Sure.
The answer will come on the field at the end of the 4th quarter.
lsu has a good football team. Are the Aggies planning to bring the wood? Sure.
The answer will come on the field at the end of the 4th quarter.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:29 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Agreed
I mean do they even play football in Louisiana? Serious question. They act like they have been winning like Texas A&M has for the last 15 years or something
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:31 pm to BYULSUalum
quote:
one has to assume that they believe that the Aggies will win in Baton Rouge.
I mean...I can't be angry. After all, I'm assuming a win vs TAMU. At least an 80% chance of an LSU victory.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:33 pm to Maroon Flash
I hope y'all as fans do believe this game will not be close, then experience the biggest knot in your stomach exiting TS.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:07 pm to BYULSUalum
quote:
TeLeFaWx: The only direct evidence we have on the subject of LSU v TAMU with JFF is the game last year. Once again, the point is: Y'all probably shouldn't automatically put the LSU game in the W column just yet.
But then again, from what I just read from you, you already have.
The only direct evidence? No one on your defense returns that even touched him in a pile, much less tackled him. By your definition, there is zero "direct evidence" if you want to discount how Manziel progressed through the season. I love how y'all discount his improvement. It is delicious. Y'all are so scared you immediately dismiss anything that could lead you to believe he will beat you... which is every other game. Tell you what, grab all those players from the NFL, restore eligibility, then you're allowed to call it "direct evidence". Discussion about Manziel reverts swamp kittens to gump level intelligence. It is precious..
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:11 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I love how y'all discount his improvement. It is delicious
Exactly. He is the only one who is improving. The fact that LSU played the 2nd most freshmen in the country last year is totally irrelevant because those players will regress. The big reason for this is that JFF discovered that the secret to improving as a football player is to spend as much time as possible in Oklahoma casinos and courtside at NBA games. LSU players did none of this hence they will not improve.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:13 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
The fact that LSU played the 2nd most freshmen in the country last year is totally irrelevant because those players will regress.
On defense? Didn't y'all have 9 players drafted or something? I seriously need an LSU fan to break down the playing time. Y'all might be right, that y'all have more returning talent than has ever seen before... but what exactly did y'all lose?
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:13 pm to TeLeFaWx
Ummmmm I believe the big guy that tea bagged him will be chasing him in the backfield yet again.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:15 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
Ummmmm I believe the big guy that tea bagged him will be chasing him in the backfield yet again.
Awesome. I hope y'all didn't lose everyone, but how many did y'all lose?
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:15 pm to TeLeFaWx
So is it an easy win or what?
LSU 2008 played our SECW champion squad super close. Almost cost us the west.
Alabama played LSU super close in 2007 and almost derailed their championship hopes for good. Never put anything as an easy win. Ever. Regardless of what tacklers return, a tackle and tacklers are still what they are. It's their job. They'll be prepared. They know the formula to win and have the D-Coordinator to do it. Have fun in Dead Dream Stadium.
LSU 2008 played our SECW champion squad super close. Almost cost us the west.
Alabama played LSU super close in 2007 and almost derailed their championship hopes for good. Never put anything as an easy win. Ever. Regardless of what tacklers return, a tackle and tacklers are still what they are. It's their job. They'll be prepared. They know the formula to win and have the D-Coordinator to do it. Have fun in Dead Dream Stadium.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:15 pm to TeLeFaWx
We lost a lot the year before and the year before that. Best believe our defense will be fine!
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:16 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I seriously need an LSU fan to break down the playing time.
Of last years 2 deep we return 34 of 44.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:17 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
We lost a lot the year before and the year before that.
SECr says that LSU is the only team that loses players though.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:18 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
We lost a lot the year before and the year before that. Best believe our defense will be fine!
So y'all lost the same amount the last three years? 90 bajillion went pro? I think I would have heard about that.Can an LSU fan please quantify it. Just one of you might have gone to college and can figure it out for me.
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:19 pm to FourThreeForty
Exactly! Even in most down years teams like LSU and bama are never an easy win 
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:19 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Of last years 2 deep we return 34 of 44.
Assuming most teams second string don't go pro, isn't that less than the norm? Of your 1 deep how many return?
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:19 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
So y'all lost the same amount the last three years?
pretty similar yes
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:19 pm to TeLeFaWx
TeLeFaWx: Please actually *read* and *contemplate this: The point of this entire thread was to inquire as to why *you* (and others) believe that the LSU game is going to be a romp for your Aggies.
My comments regarding direct evidence has to do with that question, and you have presented none, either. SO, given that, your answer is... what? ... That you believe it will be a blowout for the Aggies, "just because"?
Please note that I am not saying that LSU is going to win. What I am saying, is that you have little evidence at this point to think that the Aggies are going to win, especially in easy fashion.
Yet, you continue to assert that, and then accuse me of being stupid. How ironic.
My comments regarding direct evidence has to do with that question, and you have presented none, either. SO, given that, your answer is... what? ... That you believe it will be a blowout for the Aggies, "just because"?
Please note that I am not saying that LSU is going to win. What I am saying, is that you have little evidence at this point to think that the Aggies are going to win, especially in easy fashion.
Yet, you continue to assert that, and then accuse me of being stupid. How ironic.
Popular
Back to top


1






