Started By
Message

re: TAMU climb ends Saturday.

Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:03 am to
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
38421 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:03 am to
Solid grind.

#IBELEIVE
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149387 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Solid grind.
Posted by Daowna
Member since Dec 2010
1689 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:07 am to
Texas A&M is 3rd in the SEC in yards per rushing attempt and 4th in rushing touchdowns. But because we use 4 running backs on rotation with wide are of distribution we are suddenly 'one dimensional.'

Makes sense I guess.
This post was edited on 10/1/14 at 9:10 am
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23382 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Your leading rusher is Trey Williams with 234 yards. Good for 19th in the conference.



You don't know much about Ags offense. We spread the ball around when running or passing.

RBs
Trey Williams 6.2 ypc
Tre Carson 5.8 ypc
Brandon Williams 6.3 ypc
James White 6.7 ypc

We don't feature 1 back. A&M rushes the ball quite well as a team. I hope you guys key on Trey Williams all day.
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Stopped reading. You're either simply uninformed, or a moron.


quote:

one dimensional offense.



You had 137 yards on the ground vs ARK. They are ranked 60th in the nation. MSU is 8th.


Against ARK.. you were one dimensional with the 137 rushing yards. Pretty sure that's an issue for you.


Next.. passing vs ark.. hill was barely above 50% because he was being chased.

MSU is top 10 in tackles for a loss...ARK 68th..

The list continues to go on and on.





Posted by FrankWhite'56
Close to Austin - but not TOO close
Member since Feb 2013
998 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:10 am to
quote:

You've played 1 more game than everyone else, rushing offense isn't even comparable.


O.K. -- how about yards per carry? We're #3 in the conference -- State is #5.

(Hint: you're not going to win an argument about our offense. It is where State's offense would be 2 years from now, if they had anything over 3* talent. Stick with digs at our defense.)
Posted by skirpnasty
Atlantis
Member since Aug 2012
10789 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:10 am to
Dawg blitz finna fricking eat.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149387 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:11 am to
You understand that saying you can defend the run is different than saying we can't run right?
Posted by FrankWhite'56
Close to Austin - but not TOO close
Member since Feb 2013
998 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Dawg blitz finna be trailing 10 yards behind that screen pass.


FIFY
Posted by skirpnasty
Atlantis
Member since Aug 2012
10789 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:15 am to
Our defensive end has already picked off two screen passes this year. Please, for the love of god, live off the screen.
Posted by Daowna
Member since Dec 2010
1689 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:16 am to
quote:

You've played 1 more game than everyone else, rushing offense isn't even comparable.

Statistically if you multiply out our rushing touchdowns by four-fifths to average our total out over 4 games.. we're still ranked 4th in rushing touchdowns with 11.2. Which is still more than moo state which is tied for 7-9th.

I hope I don't have to explain to you that rushing yards per attempt isn't a product of more games played. Keep trying though, maybe you'll find something to support the original claim of our 'one dimensional' offense.
Posted by skirpnasty
Atlantis
Member since Aug 2012
10789 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:18 am to
quote:

I hope I don't have to explain to you that rushing yards per attempt isn't a product of more games played. Keep trying though, maybe you'll find something to support the original claim of our 'one dimensional' offense.


Rushing yards/game is a more indicative stat. Yards/attempt will inevitably be inflated in a passing oriented offense.

Rushing TD's, if anything, is a crutch. You won't be able to rely on rushing TD's against good run defenses.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149387 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:20 am to
And yards a game won't reflect how often you run the ball?
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24080 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Rushing TD's, if anything, is a crutch. You won't be able to rely on rushing TD's against good run defenses.


Hear that? We can't rely on scoring to beat the MSU defense. We have to come up with something else.
Posted by skirpnasty
Atlantis
Member since Aug 2012
10789 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:23 am to
Can you not score rushing and passing TD's in Texas?
Posted by 11thACR
Atlanta, Georgia
Member since Mar 2012
1652 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:25 am to
No it won't MS will be chasing their Tails before the 4th Q
Posted by JacksonCPAdawg
Member since Jun 2013
162 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:33 am to
I hate to break this to you but 75% of your rushing yds came against Rice, SMU, & LAMAR. You had 270yds against SMU alone. Pump the brakes on not being a one dimensional offfense. You've managed about 150 rushing yds a game against SEC competion. And South Carolinas defense is a joke
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23382 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:40 am to
quote:

I hate to break this to you but 75% of your rushing yds came against Rice, SMU, & LAMAR. You had 270yds against SMU alone. Pump the brakes on not being a one dimensional offfense. You've managed about 150 rushing yds a game against SEC competion. And South Carolinas defense is a joke


Okay. I really don't know how else to explain it.

Come find me on Sunday or Monday and I will try to explain exactly what happened on Saturday and how the Ags ended up with 200 yards rushing vs MSU.

Wow.
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
11041 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:41 am to
Better
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:50 am to
No. I'm clearly saying the 137 yards made you one deminsional. You could only manage that vs a very poor rush defense.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter