Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/8/13 at 3:10 pm to Alahunter
Spurrier tells it like it is, and it is what it is.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 3:18 pm to CockInYourEar
How dare he vote bama 4th instead of 3rd
Posted on 12/8/13 at 3:22 pm to Alahunter
quote:Yeah, so what? Is there a point to this thread?
Spurrier among 8 coaches voting Bama below third
Posted on 12/8/13 at 3:40 pm to Alahunter
Good for them... They are entitled to vote as they see fit .... Wait I guess they forgot to check in with bammer fans! 
Posted on 12/8/13 at 3:53 pm to tiger chaser
They should be 5th. Behind Big 10 Champion Michigan State, and behind Baylor, who also won their conference. Bama needs to stop getting props just for being Bama. They won nothing this year.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 4:07 pm to LSU1NSEC
quote:
bama didn't even win their division
Still hurt? Maybe next year you guys can keep from losing 3 games.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 4:19 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
I dont see the problem with rewarding teams that won their conference
That's logic works for me if you rank UCF #6 and Fresno St #7.
If you don't, it means you're already considering schedules and performances comparatively instead of simply ranking all conference champions ahead of everyone else.
That said, who doesn't expect there to be outliers in human polls for all kinds of reasons? That's why there are enough total voters to dilute the outliers.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 4:23 pm to Dire Wolf
Which makes you look stupid.
Conferences are not equal, so voting on the top teams have nothing to do with who wins conferences, the fact is 3 teams finished the SEC with one loss.
You dumb SEC fans are falling right into the other conferences thinking as the playoff nears, SEC with 4 to 6 teams in the top 12 but get 1 spot in the playoff because an ACC team goes undefeated LMAO.
Conferences are not equal, so voting on the top teams have nothing to do with who wins conferences, the fact is 3 teams finished the SEC with one loss.
You dumb SEC fans are falling right into the other conferences thinking as the playoff nears, SEC with 4 to 6 teams in the top 12 but get 1 spot in the playoff because an ACC team goes undefeated LMAO.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 4:25 pm to Alahunter
I always liked Kingsbury
Posted on 12/8/13 at 4:26 pm to Alahunter
I could possibly see ranking them #4, but no way any lower than 4
Posted on 12/8/13 at 4:28 pm to Alahunter
So long as they voted a 1 loss team who had a significant win on their resume they have voted logically. Bama's best win was over a good but not elite LSU team.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 4:29 pm to TeLeFaWx
Bama never can win their own division. Not this year or in 20111
Posted on 12/8/13 at 4:35 pm to RceTigers
quote:
Bama never can win their own division. Not this year or in 20111
How about 2009 and 2012. Oh and also these too.
4 Southern Conference titles in 1924, 1925, 1926, and 1930. Alabama captured the first SEC title in 1933 and has won a total of 23 SEC Championships (1933, 1934, 1937, 1945, 1953, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1981, 1989, 1992, 1999, 2009, and 2012).
Posted on 12/8/13 at 4:41 pm to Alahunter
I have no issues with it. Rankings between 3-8 really don't matter for any purposes this season. Anyone promoting Coach A voted Team B to 4 or 6th is probably bored on rainy Sunday with nothing to do or simply trying to pick a fight because their team lost 3 or more games in a season of their greatest offensive output in 50 years and are simply in denial of the inevitable decline of their program. 
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News