Started By
Message

re: SportsbyBrooks reports on AU's Tigerettes

Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:08 pm to
Posted by NBamaAlum
Soul Patrolville
Member since Jan 2009
27604 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:08 pm to
KyleOrtensMustache
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
90320 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:10 pm to
Where the hell is mine
Posted by DeoreDX
Member since Oct 2010
4228 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

Did Brooks just make the whole thing up? I'm late to the party.


He didn't make anything up as much as distort the facts. Tigerettes /Tiger Hosts are not paid for their duties as Tigerettes/Hosts, though many have other student jobs that allows them to get paid. My wife's position at the University has anywhere between 30-50 student workers reporting to her at any given time. Over the years there have been several Tigerettes/Hosts working for her in a position totally unrelated to their duties as Tigerettes/Tiger Hosts.
Posted by Itsme2011
Member since Jan 2011
855 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:14 pm to
just straight up pimps is what our universities are all about now! SAD!
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33154 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Sex. It drives everything we do. We go to work to get money so we can frick women. It is that simple.


I've been saying this for years.

Money is not the root of all evil.

A man may turn down having sex with one woman for some money but ONLY because he knows he can have more sex with more women because of the money.
Posted by NBamaAlum
Soul Patrolville
Member since Jan 2009
27604 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:17 pm to
You like?

<--------------
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
52948 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:17 pm to
Wonder why Brooks has no problem taking a private citizen and broadcasting her financial business all over the interwebz, but he is too chicken shite to even disclose his last name?
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33154 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Ingrid Coney? Is she a Tigerette?



Naw, she sent me a friend request.

I just wanted to post a facebook pic.
Posted by NBamaAlum
Soul Patrolville
Member since Jan 2009
27604 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Wonder why Brooks has no problem taking a private citizen and broadcasting her financial business all over the interwebz



Because as a state actor, AU payroll is public?
Posted by NBamaAlum
Soul Patrolville
Member since Jan 2009
27604 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Naw, she sent me a friend request.

I just wanted to post a facebook pic



It's a trap.
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
52948 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Because as a state actor, AU payroll is public?


I don't care if it's public or not. He did this as a hit piece and in the same moment, thrust a person into the spotlight that had no urge to be. This woman's name and face is all over the internet now, and he's too much of a pussy to even put a last name to his "journalism".
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33154 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

It's a trap.



looks like one to me!

Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Because as a state actor, AU payroll is public?

True, but it is still poor form to post these girls' names, pictures and incomes and suggest they are whores being pimped out by football coaches just to increase traffic on your website.
Posted by NBamaAlum
Soul Patrolville
Member since Jan 2009
27604 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:23 pm to
She signed up to be a Tigerette. If you expect to be paid/reimbursed, it is gonna be out there because it is a state entity. Cest la vie.
Posted by NBamaAlum
Soul Patrolville
Member since Jan 2009
27604 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

True


You could have stopped there.


quote:

but it is still poor form to post these girls' names, pictures and incomes and suggest they are whores being pimped out by football coaches just to increase traffic on your website.


At what point is "taste" expected out of a website called Sports by Brooks?
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
29586 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:25 pm to
20 pages? Sheesh, I got through page 5 but can't do this all afternoon...

So has anyone made clear whether or not this is against any NCAA rules and do we know if other schools do this? What's all the fuss?
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57010 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

You like?

<--------------


It's great. I felt you needed to stick with the JWN theme and that pic is great
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

True, but it is still poor form to post these girls' names, pictures and incomes and suggest they are whores being pimped out by football coaches just to increase traffic on your website.




He never suggested they were whores. Everyone else here made that leap.
Posted by The ChizMan Cometh
Tigerdroppings Legend
Member since Feb 2011
1671 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

True, but it is still poor form to post these girls' names, pictures and incomes and suggest they are whores being pimped out by football coaches just to increase traffic on your website.



That is what i was saying earlier... He didn't leave it generic and just say Tigerttes, he used an actual girl's name, and strongly implied she was fricking and sucking football recruits.

Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

He never suggested they were whores.
Yes he did.
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22 ... 34
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 34Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter