Started By
Message
re: SportsbyBrooks reports on AU's Tigerettes
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:08 pm to The ChizMan Cometh
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:08 pm to The ChizMan Cometh
KyleOrtensMustache
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:14 pm to Camp Randall
quote:
Did Brooks just make the whole thing up? I'm late to the party.
He didn't make anything up as much as distort the facts. Tigerettes /Tiger Hosts are not paid for their duties as Tigerettes/Hosts, though many have other student jobs that allows them to get paid. My wife's position at the University has anywhere between 30-50 student workers reporting to her at any given time. Over the years there have been several Tigerettes/Hosts working for her in a position totally unrelated to their duties as Tigerettes/Tiger Hosts.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:14 pm to TT9
just straight up pimps is what our universities are all about now! SAD!
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:15 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
Sex. It drives everything we do. We go to work to get money so we can frick women. It is that simple.
I've been saying this for years.
Money is not the root of all evil.
A man may turn down having sex with one woman for some money but ONLY because he knows he can have more sex with more women because of the money.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:17 pm to Itsme2011
Wonder why Brooks has no problem taking a private citizen and broadcasting her financial business all over the interwebz, but he is too chicken shite to even disclose his last name?
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:17 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
Ingrid Coney? Is she a Tigerette?
Naw, she sent me a friend request.
I just wanted to post a facebook pic.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:17 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
Wonder why Brooks has no problem taking a private citizen and broadcasting her financial business all over the interwebz
Because as a state actor, AU payroll is public?
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:18 pm to chinese58
quote:
Naw, she sent me a friend request.
I just wanted to post a facebook pic
It's a trap.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:21 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
Because as a state actor, AU payroll is public?
I don't care if it's public or not. He did this as a hit piece and in the same moment, thrust a person into the spotlight that had no urge to be. This woman's name and face is all over the internet now, and he's too much of a pussy to even put a last name to his "journalism".
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:22 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
It's a trap.
looks like one to me!
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:23 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:True, but it is still poor form to post these girls' names, pictures and incomes and suggest they are whores being pimped out by football coaches just to increase traffic on your website.
Because as a state actor, AU payroll is public?
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:23 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
She signed up to be a Tigerette. If you expect to be paid/reimbursed, it is gonna be out there because it is a state entity. Cest la vie.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:25 pm to WDE24
quote:
True
You could have stopped there.
quote:
but it is still poor form to post these girls' names, pictures and incomes and suggest they are whores being pimped out by football coaches just to increase traffic on your website.
At what point is "taste" expected out of a website called Sports by Brooks?
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:25 pm to WDE24
20 pages? Sheesh, I got through page 5 but can't do this all afternoon...
So has anyone made clear whether or not this is against any NCAA rules and do we know if other schools do this? What's all the fuss?
So has anyone made clear whether or not this is against any NCAA rules and do we know if other schools do this? What's all the fuss?
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:28 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
You like?
<--------------
It's great. I felt you needed to stick with the JWN theme and that pic is great
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:30 pm to WDE24
quote:
True, but it is still poor form to post these girls' names, pictures and incomes and suggest they are whores being pimped out by football coaches just to increase traffic on your website.
He never suggested they were whores. Everyone else here made that leap.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:32 pm to WDE24
quote:
True, but it is still poor form to post these girls' names, pictures and incomes and suggest they are whores being pimped out by football coaches just to increase traffic on your website.
That is what i was saying earlier... He didn't leave it generic and just say Tigerttes, he used an actual girl's name, and strongly implied she was fricking and sucking football recruits.
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:32 pm to The Spleen
quote:Yes he did.
He never suggested they were whores.
Popular
Back to top


0







