Started By
Message
re: So the state of Alabama now only has 14 football national titles?
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:21 pm to JordanfortheJ
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:21 pm to JordanfortheJ
You misspelled forth
0
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:24 pm to hawgfaninc
I just checked with the NCAA and they've finished processing your national championship application for 1964.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news...
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news...
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:26 pm to BrerTiger
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:28 pm to USMC Gators
Three way tie, so I guess a 1/3 is better than nothing
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:34 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
Maybe you should check again.
:insertboomgifhere:
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:36 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:Looks like Alabama is listed as well
Maybe you should check again.
:insertboomgifhere:
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:37 pm to hawgfaninc
If Alabama can claim it, then Ole Miss really was 2003 division champs
Should be 13 1/3
Should be 13 1/3
This post was edited on 4/3/13 at 11:38 pm
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:38 pm to LSUNV
quote:
If Alabama can claim it, then Ole Miss really was 2003 division champs
I was trying to find the banner picture to make the same reference, but failed miserably.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:39 pm to CNB
Only one I could find
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:40 pm to JordanfortheJ
quote:
JordanfortheJ
You spelled Jordon wrong.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:41 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
Maybe you should check again.
Let's ask Mark Emmert what he thinks about the FBS postseason...
quote:
On Wednesday, NCAA president Mark Emmert provided a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice in response to its query earlier this month regarding the Bowl Championship Series system. He explained how the Football Bowl Subdivision postseason format is determined by FBS member schools and directed questions to the BCS on its system, which does not fall under the purview of the NCAA.
In his response letter, Emmert said, “Inasmuch as the BCS system does not fall under the purview of the NCAA, it is not appropriate for me to provide views on the system.
“… As a result, your request for views on how the BCS system serves ‘the interest of fans, colleges, universities, and players’ is better directed to the BCS itself.”
LINK
The NCAA doesn't give two shits who calls themselves national champion. They have nothing to do with it. Never have.
So some list on the NCAA's website is meaningless. Those aren't official championships. Any team can claim a title for whatever year they like. The NCAA is powerless to say otherwise because they don't proclaim anyone to be an official champ in the first place.
If Arkansas wants to claim '64, then Auburn can claim '04. Why not? Seems legit to me. One of those teams ran the table in the greatest conference man has ever known and beat every team they faced. The other didn't.
This post was edited on 4/3/13 at 11:42 pm
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:42 pm to genro
quote:
Looks like Alabama is listed as well
alabama grads in the ncaa office doing work
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:44 pm to genro
quote:
Looks like Alabama is listed as well
This thread isn't turning out the way hawgfaninc hoped.
None of his fellow Piggies have showed up to troll at the trough.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:47 pm to BrerTiger
quote:
This thread isn't turning out the way hawgfaninc hoped.
how did i hope it would turn out?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News