Started By
Message
re: So Ben Tate is faster than McCluster?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:53 pm to adammwilson
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:53 pm to adammwilson
Yeah, he did awesome this past year. I mean, he topped out over 100 yds rushing in one whole game. 

Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:54 pm to Alahunter
quote:
So it's your assertion that Charles Scott is as good as Jerome Bettis. Nice.
when did i say that????????????? i was just making the point that there is a place for big running backs in the NFL...
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:55 pm to Alahunter
quote:
he topped out over 100 yds rushing in one whole game
behind that horrible o.line it's no surprise
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:55 pm to sabes que
oh and i guess i will ask again.... when did i say that speed didn't matter in nfl backs???? please please please show me where i said that.... and pleaaaassee show me where i said that CS is as good a jerome bettis
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:55 pm to sabes que
And you used an awesome back as a comparison. Show me where Bettis had 15 yds rushing in a game, like Scott had against Ms.St. or 20 yds in a game, like he had against Au and it might convince me a little more.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:56 pm to Alahunter
you said a running back has no business being that big... i threw out some great backs that were/are bigger than CS.. that is all. i didnt ever say he was as good as any of them.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:56 pm to adammwilson
Maybe, just maybe it wasn't entirely the O-line. Perhaps, just a little bit, it was coaching and the RB himself that contributed to poor performance.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:57 pm to sabes que
quote:
sabes que
dude just let it go
alahunter has tired of posting about Sabans Pecan tins and how Terrance Cody doesn't wear granny panties and how the University of Gump will claim their 100th straight spring national championship in football in 32 days

Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:57 pm to sabes que
I didn't say a RB. I said CS. And he underperformed. If it's not coaching, and it's not his new ballooned up size, then what do you attribute his poor showing to?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:58 pm to Alahunter
im still waiting for you to show me where i said that speed doesnt matter in an NFL back... or that CS is as good as Jerome Bettis... i would seriously be exstatic if you could just go back and quote where i said either one of those....
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:58 pm to danfraz
You must. You just brought up everything that I haven't discussed or posted a topic about. Deflection is what you use when you have no argument to make.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 3:59 pm to Alahunter
quote:
You stated that his time wasn't bad for a RB that weighed 240. It is. It's bad that a RB even weighs this much, but to then have OLinemen show more athletic ability, that's sad. Like I said, some would, in addition to blaming his lack of discipline, blame the coaches for instilling such a poor work ethic. After all, how many times on here in this site, have Lsu fans said that a players results are the reflection of his coaching? It carries through for your team too, right? Fact is, he showed up heavier than he should be, has underperformed what he should have. That is either a reflection of being coached poorly, or you had a bad RB this year
so you said CS not running back?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:00 pm to sabes que
I posted what you said. Go back and read. I don't know why yall are so upset. It's fact that your ex-rb underperformed. There has to be some reason for it, yet for yall, it's not him, it's not his size, it's not his ability, it wasn't coaching that got him where he is. So enlighten me. Why was his performance so piss poor?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:01 pm to sabes que
You know I was referring to CS, you posted that he weighed that much. Are you that unable to make your argument that you have to nitpick the details instead of making your own argument?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:01 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Deflection is what you use when you have no argument to make
Ive made my argument yet you keep rambling
quote:
You just brought up everything that alahunter gets pissy about when someone other than a gump brings them up?
correct
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:01 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Alahunter
LOL at Alahunter judging somebody's draft status solely by looking a combine results. Dude, go back and look at his FILM over the last four years. He's a prototypical NFL RB.
4.67 might not be a sexy number, but that's very solid for a 240 lber (if that's how much he weighs).
Plus, Charles Scott broke his collar bone. Sure that didnt help him get into tip top shape.
This post was edited on 2/28/10 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:02 pm to Alahunter
You stated that his time wasn't bad for a RB that weighed 240. It is. It's bad that a RB even weighs this much, but to then have OLinemen show more athletic ability, that's sad. Like I said, some would, in addition to blaming his lack of discipline, blame the coaches for instilling such a poor work ethic. After all, how many times on here in this site, have Lsu fans said that a players results are the reflection of his coaching? It carries through for your team too, right? Fact is, he showed up heavier than he should be, has underperformed what he should have. That is either a reflection of being coached poorly, or you had a bad RB this year
I didn't say a RB. I said CS. And he underperformed. If it's not coaching, and it's not his new ballooned up size, then what do you attribute his poor showing to?
hahahahahhahahahhaha
I didn't say a RB. I said CS. And he underperformed. If it's not coaching, and it's not his new ballooned up size, then what do you attribute his poor showing to?
hahahahahhahahahhaha
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:02 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
LOL at Alahunter judging somebody's draft status solely by looking a combine results.
Says the guy who made a thread bragging about his ex-rb's stats at the combine.

Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:02 pm to LSU8932
McCluster is shifty and has great football speed. His 40 time isn't surprising. I've seen him get caught from behind numerous times. He's just so exposlive from the word "Go."
Popular
Back to top
