Started By
Message
re: Selection committee
Posted on 10/17/13 at 1:21 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Posted on 10/17/13 at 1:21 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
but you can't sit here and tell me that she was one of the most qualified people in America to decide a cfb national title participant.
So what are the qualifications necessary to make that decision?
This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 1:24 pm
1
Posted on 10/17/13 at 1:40 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Well yeah. When you're going with opposite ends of the spectrum, but when it was like last year , who is to say bama was more deserving of Oregon?
21-0. And that will never change, no matter how much you whine like a baby or bitch about scheduling.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 2:04 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
The "eye test."
I'm sure they'll name all sorts of criteria, but at the end of the day, this is what it'll come down to. Well, along with which teams will travel better, make for more exciting match-ups, blah, blah, blah.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 2:29 pm to LSU316
quote:
But then if the committee decided that LSU didn’t meet the qualifications for the playoffs
If there was a close 4th between LSU and any other team do you see any member who may vote against LSU? Heh? Think hard.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 2:30 pm to redeye
quote:
quote:
The "eye test."
I'm sure they'll name all sorts of criteria, but at the end of the day, this is what it'll come down to. Well, along with which teams will travel better, make for more exciting match-ups, blah, blah, blah.
I'm even less optimistic than you. All of the criteria you listed is ridiculous, but at least it's an attempt to choose the best team. I expect some filthy, backroom deals based on money.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 5:55 pm to Beer Bryant
quote:
Your best sec win in 2011 was 21-0 over the greatest LSU team eva
Two things.
1. If you think your 21-0 win was an sec win, you don't know shite about cfb. Common amongst GUNTS.
2. The 2003 lsu team would mop the floor with 2011 lsu.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 5:57 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
The 2003 lsu team would mop the floor with 2011 lsu.
1. Worse than 21-0?
2. They lost to Ron Zook.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 5:57 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
So what are the qualifications necessary to make that decision? This post was edited on 10/17 at 1:24 pm
I think one would be being a coach or administrator in cfb would be the most important. Come on. What the hell does CR have to do with cfb?
Posted on 10/17/13 at 6:00 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
21-0. And that will never change, no matter how much you whine like a baby or bitch about scheduling.
I know you GUMPS determine your sense of self worth by bama wins, but I don't. I was over 21-0 when the clock hit 00:00. I didn't play in the game so it doesn't bother. Lsu in 2011 was the best team in the sec. That's a fact.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 6:01 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
I'm even less optimistic than you. All of the criteria you listed is ridiculous, but at least it's an attempt to choose the best team. I expect some filthy, backroom deals based on money.
So if the " BEST " ( subjective as frick) team slips up and loses , should they get in over 4 undefeated teams?
Posted on 10/17/13 at 6:04 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
1. Worse than 21-0? 2. They lost to Ron Zook.
And? 2008 UF lost to ole miss.
2003 lsu defense had 10/11 starters to start in the nfl. Not just get drafted. They started for a nfl team. We also had a very balanced offense all year. Our qb matched our single season td record. Sorry. 2003 lsu is better.
It's also the second best ppt defense in sec history while playing a harder schedule than 2011 bama(#1 ppg defense)
This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 6:08 pm
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News