Started By
Message

re: SECCG ratings drop 49% from last year.

Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:17 am to
Posted by TigerWoody
btwn where I was & where I will be
Member since Dec 2007
11387 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:17 am to
Nah. Daddy shopped him. THAT is enough that he should not play. SEC and NCAA f'ed this up.
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:17 am to
Cool, so then we both agree that Cam is an eligible student athlete based on NCAA and SEC rulings?
Posted by MCHamaBama
Da Ham
Member since Nov 2010
1123 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:18 am to
Next year you will need all the points you can get. Your team is going to the NFL after 1 more game.
Posted by TigerWoody
btwn where I was & where I will be
Member since Dec 2007
11387 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Burying my head in the sand so it doesn't bother me. To each their own
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37730 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:18 am to
I had planned on watching the game but I was too busy watching paint dry.
Posted by TigerWoody
btwn where I was & where I will be
Member since Dec 2007
11387 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:18 am to
NO...he should be INELIGIBLE by the what the NCAA says it stands for.
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:19 am to
quote:

NO...he should be INELIGIBLE by the what the NCAA says it stands for.


There you go again..
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Next year you will need all the points you can get. Your team is going to the NFL after 1 more game.


Oh damn...that effects us playing for the national championship this year how?
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:20 am to
quote:

NO...he should be INELIGIBLE by the what the NCAA says it stands for.


So you're upset with the NCAA and the SEC for the way they interpreted their rules?
Posted by jatebe
Queen of Links
Member since Oct 2008
18505 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:21 am to
quote:

I can't tell you how unbelievably sad this makes me. Boycotting is so noble. Fight the good fight, my man.


Thanks, my husband and I have never supported Auburn by watching any of their games. We will continue to keep up the good work.
Posted by bona fide
Burma
Member since Jun 2010
8972 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:21 am to
I watched, but was not excited. If it would have been a rematch with LSU,ARK or Bama it would have been more interesting to the nat'l audience.

The BCSCG should get a big audience.
Posted by UASports23
Basketball School
Member since Nov 2009
26433 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:22 am to
It is unfortunate for Auburn that the Cam thing occurred, they don't have a big team to play against for a BCS title, and the SEC east was down this year.

The BCSCG should be a gimme. IF Auburn really does lose this game they should get kicked out of the SEC. Losing a title to an far inferior opponent, giving the SEC a blk eye, and getting into probation (if that occurs) is enough to kick them out IMO.
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Thanks, my husband and I

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I see now. Sorry I hated on you before. I understand why I didn't like you now.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37730 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:24 am to
quote:

bullshite claims


Posted by Aman
Alabama
Member since Mar 2010
5181 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:24 am to
quote:

The BCSCG should get a big audience.


I bet you the ratings will be down at least 40% from last year. The Sugar bowl will probably get higher ratings.
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:24 am to
quote:

The BCSCG should be a gimme. IF Auburn really does lose this game they should get kicked out of the SEC. Losing a title to an far inferior opponent, giving the SEC a blk eye, and getting into probation (if that occurs) is enough to kick them out IMO.


Even you're not foolish enough to believe this shite. Oregon is a very talent team and to suggest they are a vastly inferior team is absurd. But i see what you're trying to do.
This post was edited on 12/6/10 at 10:26 am
Posted by bona fide
Burma
Member since Jun 2010
8972 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:25 am to
Yes, it will be down but not 40%.

Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:25 am to
quote:

crimsonsaint

"Death penalty coming soon".... "hell week".... "LSU and Arky have been informed that the winner of their game will be playing in the SEC title game"...
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I bet you the ratings will be down at least 40% from last year. The Sugar bowl will probably get higher ratings.


Serious question. Why are you non auburn fans concerned with the TV ratings?
Posted by UASports23
Basketball School
Member since Nov 2009
26433 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:26 am to
quote:

The BCSCG should get a big audience.



No, like I said it is Oregon v Auburn. Neither school is the biggest school in their respective conference. If it were Oklahoma v Auburn or some other big team. Then I'd say yes.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter