Started By
Message
re: SEC Top 5 players by position
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:18 am to SICEMDAWGS11
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:18 am to SICEMDAWGS11
Lambo graduated.
List is shite with no Germain Ifedi or Mike Matthews
List is shite with no Germain Ifedi or Mike Matthews
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:24 am to SICEMDAWGS11
I believe you placed this perfectly! 

Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:28 am to BromHarris
Cam dutton should be #2. Curt maggitt needs to be on this list as does jalen reeves maybin
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:29 am to VolsMissthe90s
Aaron Medley was the best kicker % wise and in made FGs in the SEC last year yet he's not in the top 5 on your list.
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:31 am to VolsMissthe90s
quote:
Curt maggitt
A returning 2nd team All-SEC selection should not be in the top 5 of his position group.
Remember, this is the sec rant.
Posted on 5/13/15 at 11:46 am to Serraneaux
5 OT's listed and Dan Skipper is not one???? Come on MAN!
also Tretola listed and Kirkland not.... Kirkland is the better player but both should be on the list.
also Tretola listed and Kirkland not.... Kirkland is the better player but both should be on the list.
Posted on 5/13/15 at 12:49 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
So, a QB that may or may not even start, one who the coaches see every single day in practice and know far more about his abilities than you and STILL don't have the confidence enough to name him the starter....is going to be the difference in an average year for LSU and making the final 4?
I've said all offseason that I believe he will start, but it's up to Miles. You see what Dobbs did last year, that's Harris, but better. Not just better because Harris has a much stronger arm and quicker feet, but because he has a top level OL, ridiculous backfield, and a yearly top 15 defense. Dobbs had none of that at his disposal last year, and the only reason I didn't mention WRs, is because Tennessee has some good ones as well.
All I'm saying, is, if Miles gives him the go ahead game one, by the time we reach South Carolina, people are going to be thinking playoffs.
Posted on 5/13/15 at 1:20 pm to Volatile
quote:
That said one of Arkansas's running backs is getting too much love.
Which one? The one that ran for 300 more than Jalen Hurd or the one that ran for 200 more than Jalen Hurd?
Posted on 5/13/15 at 1:26 pm to SICEMDAWGS11
quote:
3. Patrick Tolles, UK
Change to Towles, please. TIA.
Posted on 5/13/15 at 2:04 pm to Swoopin
quote:
It blows my mind that LSU fans think they have a case for Fournette > Chubb
I think they are more even than you think.
Yes, Chubb had a slightly better year.
But he did it against a little lesser competetion and he was not hamstrung by his head coach's inability to put together a decent offense.
In short, if Chubb played for LSU last year, he would ahve done pretty much what LF did. If LF played for UGA last year, he would have done pretty much what CHubb did.
Posted on 5/13/15 at 3:10 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
Change to Towles, please. TIA.
Even more proof he shouldn't be top 3. If you can't spell his name right he's obviously not that good.
0:1 TD Int ration and less than 170 yards passing against TN.
Hell after playing ULM he only topped 200 yards passing once in 6 games.
Posted on 5/13/15 at 3:22 pm to LACountyTiger
quote:
Chubb had a slightly better year.
I don't think slightly was the word you were looking for here.
quote:
But he did it against a little lesser competetion
What do you call absolutely torching the #5, #10, #12, #13, and #27 rushing defenses in the country? Granted they would've been a lot higher ranked had Chubb not had his way with them.
Posted on 5/13/15 at 5:09 pm to Jail Cell Odell
quote:
But he did it against a little lesser competetion
What do you call absolutely torching the #5, #10, #12, #13, and #27 rushing defenses in the country? Granted they would've been a lot higher ranked had Chubb not had his way with them.
He is just trolling. He would never account for the oppositions rushing D, because it doesn’t fit his argument. Everyone outside of BR knows who the better player is so let them define their argument with zero facts.
Back to top
