Started By
Message
re: SEC standings last 3,5, and 10 years...
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:29 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:29 pm to CapstoneGrad06
He still mad cause they lost to Osu..
0
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:36 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
If you must be an arse, you should at least arrange the "edited" standings correctly. Because you and I both know that a 50% winning percentage doesn't place you in front of someone with a 55.1% winning percentage. Nor does 55% overcome 62.9%.
The same amount of games were played, so if your theory was correct, yes the winning percentage would be higher. Since it isn't, not receiving positive credit for the vacated games is further punishment for your illegal transgressions.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:38 pm to DaleDenton
Having your cake and eating it too, I see. Just to try and make Arkansas look better. What ever makes you feel better, asshat.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:41 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
st to try and make Arkansas look better. What ever makes you feel better, asshat.
Right, because it isn't like you pulled make believe wins out of thin air in order to bolster bama's numbers in you original post...
I hope you sleep well tonight.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:43 pm to DaleDenton
Actually I pulled them out of Phil Steele magazine. And regardless, you're making up limits to how to arrange standings. Percentages are percentages. It doesn't matter the number of games played, or not played. Have you never looked at baseball standings before?
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:44 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Ha ha... This guy took a good bit of time to show us what we already know.. Guess he can make himself a shirt while he's at it...
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:44 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
I hope you sleep well tonight.
That is for Cheezy to say.Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:46 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Simple question.
If the NCAA were to force Auburn to vacate all games from last season, the next time you make a similar thread to this one, and lets be honest with ourselves, you will. Will you include Auburn's 8 conference wins from the past season or will you leave them out of the totals?
This is a rhetorical question in that I already know what you would do...
If the NCAA were to force Auburn to vacate all games from last season, the next time you make a similar thread to this one, and lets be honest with ourselves, you will. Will you include Auburn's 8 conference wins from the past season or will you leave them out of the totals?
This is a rhetorical question in that I already know what you would do...
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:47 pm to DaleDenton
I simply pulled them from a magazine. Changing the standings to reflect "vacated wins" doesn't change what happened on the field. Hell, those games are still in the loss column for teams that lost to Alabama.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:48 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Going to update the OP stats?
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:48 pm to Sao
Why would I update it? They're not my standings. It's from Phil Steele magazine.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:49 pm to CapstoneGrad06
K.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:50 pm to DaleDenton
Fear the thumb.... It's coming...
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:51 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Hell, those games are still in the loss column for teams that lost to Alabama.
Which is why I didn't add "wins" for the teams that procured the losses.
Don't like it? Don't cheat. It is that simple.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:52 pm to taylormade
quote:
Fear the thumb.... It's coming...
What is it like? Care to share your experience?
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:52 pm to DaleDenton
That's fine. We'll just continue to kick Arkansas' arse. Get ready for your fifth straight loss.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:54 pm to DaleDenton
It's like always marking a W beside the Arky game..
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:56 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Arrange your numbers any way you like, Cap. We won't stand in your way of claiming more than you deserve.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 10:58 pm to Sao
I'm not claiming anything. Anyway you cut it, 55% is never going to be more than 62.9%.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 11:02 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
I'm not claiming anything. Anyway you cut it, 55% is never going to be more than 62.9%.
Bammer math at its finest.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News