Started By
Message
re: SEC Baseball Programs Ranked Since Field Expansion to 64 Teams
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:52 pm to Farmer1906
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:52 pm to Farmer1906
Add a category for -20 points if you go 0-2 in your own regional
0
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:53 pm to CayceCock13
quote:
Posted by MullenBoys online on 6/7/16 at 2:48 pm to Farmer1906 How in the hell do you have Arkansas ranked ahead of MSU? That's just most obvious in looking. MSU has been to more CWS, 7 more regionals etc. Where did you find this garbage?
Miss State has 17 conf titles. Going back to the old SWC including the SEC, Arkansas has like 4. Wtf?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:53 pm to CayceCock13
Vandy over UF IMO, only one was a championship.
8 points is not enough for titles IMO.
8 points is not enough for titles IMO.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:54 pm to Farmer1906
LSU leads the conference in:
CWS Titles (tied)
CWS appearances
Super Regional Hosts
Super Regionals
Regional Hosts
Who are we tied with for CWS titles?
Nevermind, it's tied since 1999, USC.
CWS Titles (tied)
CWS appearances
Super Regional Hosts
Super Regionals
Regional Hosts
Who are we tied with for CWS titles?
Nevermind, it's tied since 1999, USC.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:54 pm to MullenBoys
No way in hell Arkansas is above MSU
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:56 pm to Farmer1906
Your shite is flawed bad.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:00 pm to MullenBoys
You seem very rustled.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:04 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
because yall were in a weak conference and you couldn't beat big bro
eh Texas and Oklahoma State were Omaha regulars. Oklahoma won a national title in 1994 and went to Omaha 3 of 4 years in that time span. In a tournament format that had 48 teams until 1999, that's not bad for a conference that had 10 members
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:05 pm to Farmer1906
Calling it like it is. Miss State has been to more CWS, more regionals and 13 more conference titles. What do you not understand?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:06 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
Miss State has 17 conf titles. Going back to the old SWC including the SEC, Arkansas has like 4. Wtf?
and all of your conference titles prior to this year were prior to 1990. That's a pretty big gap
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:06 pm to MullenBoys
I understand how to read. Maybe you should try.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:08 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
Calling it like it is. Miss State has been to more CWS, more regionals and 13 more conference titles. What do you not understand?
I think you don't understand what 1999-present means
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:09 pm to lsufball19
quote:
and all of your conference titles prior to this year were prior to 1990. That's a pretty big gap
I included all of Arkansas too. Your point?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:10 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
Calling it like it is.
Nah... You are calling it like you wish it was. What part of 1999-present do you not understand?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:10 pm to MullenBoys
the point that he wanted a most recent capture of the SEC and current baseball forefront
nb4morebutthurt
nb4morebutthurt
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:11 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
I included all of Arkansas too. Your point?
my point is the graph shows what teams have done under the current NCAA Tournament format (1999-present). In the current format, Arkansas has been a more successful program, which is why they are ranked above State
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:11 pm to lsufball19
quote:
I think you don't understand what 1999-present means
Oh, so selective years. Ok I get it. Rah rah for Arkansas then.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:13 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
Oh, so selective years. Ok I get it. Rah rah for Arkansas then.
it's not really selective. if you'll read the thread it's pretty clear. Super regionals didn't exist until 1999. How would you propose credit be given for super regionals prior to 1999? Prior to 1999, the torunament was eight 6 team regionals, with each regional being double elimination, and the champion going straight to Omaha. That is why 1999 was chosen, and it makes perfect logical sense why that year was chosen.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:15 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
Oh, so selective years. Ok I get it. Rah rah for Arkansas then.
Hell.. just give him a couple weeks. Then you'll be ranked ahead of Arkansas, and hopefully happy.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:17 pm to lsufball19
quote:
it's not really selective. if you'll read the thread it's pretty clear. Super regionals didn't exist until 1999. How would you propose credit be given for super regionals prior to 1999? Prior to 1999, the torunament was eight 6 team regionals, with each regional being double elimination, and the champion going straight to Omaha. That is why 1999 was chosen, and it makes perfect logical sense why that year was chosen.
That's fine but it comes across as Arkansas has a more storied tradition than MSU. I can cross numbers the same way and say LSU is middle of the pac based on my years I choose.
Page 3 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News