Started By
Message
re: rumor confirmed
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:18 pm to MightyYat
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:18 pm to MightyYat
if it was an AU booster, likely a few games and they have to pay money back
if it was a Bama booster, all bets are off
also, with the textbook thing, "lack of institutional control" comes into the forefront
if this rumor is true, could this situation possibly have delayed the textbook penalty announcement?
if it was a Bama booster, all bets are off
also, with the textbook thing, "lack of institutional control" comes into the forefront
if this rumor is true, could this situation possibly have delayed the textbook penalty announcement?
3
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if this rumor is true, could this situation possibly have delayed the textbook penalty announcement?
That's one thing that I was thinking, but I dare not be the first to say it aloud, otherwise I would get branded for spreading rumors.
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:19 pm to MightyYat
I just don't understand how some of you people buy into all these rumors.
If you have read this board for any ammount of time you know that some one brings some ridiculous rumor every day and 99% of the time it's all complete BS.
Yet every time most of these retards bite and these things take on a life of their own.
"But UPT, an Alabama fan started this thread... it must be true!"
--- Some of our dumbfrick, redneck fans are just as big of rumor starters as Boogereaters and others.
This is such ridiculous BS.
If you have read this board for any ammount of time you know that some one brings some ridiculous rumor every day and 99% of the time it's all complete BS.
Yet every time most of these retards bite and these things take on a life of their own.
"But UPT, an Alabama fan started this thread... it must be true!"
--- Some of our dumbfrick, redneck fans are just as big of rumor starters as Boogereaters and others.
This is such ridiculous BS.
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
also, with the textbook thing, "lack of institutional control" comes into the forefront
Its "failure to monitor"
LOIC is what USC is facing.
Also, the timing for the textbook thing has never been delayed. It was always a late May, early June decision.
This post was edited on 5/31/09 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:20 pm to UPT
quote:
Boogereaters
Did you seriously just use this as a nickname?
Seriously?
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:22 pm to Ross
quote:
Did you seriously just use this as a nickname?
Seriously?
Boogereater?
yes.
Can you not fricking read?
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:22 pm to UPT
quote:
If you have read this board for any ammount of time you know that some one brings some ridiculous rumor every day and 99% of the time it's all complete BS.
the fact that there are rumored pics makes it more likely
i've seen my fair share of rumors, and there is a certain pattern that takes hold with the true ones
this situation fits that pattern
quote:
This is such ridiculous BS.
you sound like an RP supporter about 2 years ago
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:23 pm to UPT
quote:
UPT
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:24 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Its "failure to monitor"
it can be either
there are no hard and fast rules for lack of institutional control
and having 2 major violations while on probation could be enough for lack of institutional control
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the fact that there are rumored pics makes it more likely
Please... I'd love to see them. Again... rumor. you even typed it out yourself.
quote:
you sound like an RP supporter about 2 years ago
I have no idea what this means.
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:26 pm to UPT
quote:
I have no idea what this means.
It means you sound like one of the people who were in denial about RP being a dumbass.
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:27 pm to Ross
quote:
It means you sound like one of the people who were in denial about RP being a dumbass.
Ryan Periloux? Why would I be in denial about him?
I'm lost.
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:27 pm to Ross
I don't think he has a clue who RP is.
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:27 pm to UPT
quote:
Ryan Periloux? Why would I be in denial about him?
I'm lost.
It was an analogous statement. Hence the key word, "like".
This post was edited on 5/31/09 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:28 pm to Ross
Analingous?
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:41 pm to Alabama Slim
If the cruise was really the player's girlfriend's dad... you would think that, if there were no ulterior motives involved, he would have bought a trip for his daughter as well, not another player.
This alone tells me something's not quite right.
(Unless he didn't want to provide his daughter with "alone time" with her boyfriend.... In which case he's fooling himself)
This alone tells me something's not quite right.
(Unless he didn't want to provide his daughter with "alone time" with her boyfriend.... In which case he's fooling himself)
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:42 pm to yurintroubl
Per tidesports
The host of the trip was an Auburn fan, whose daughters attend or attended Auburn, and not connected to the University of Alabama in any way. Julio had a prior relationship with the guy from before due to he and his family owning a condo in Gulf Shores, and he has been reimbursed for the trip. No decisions have been made regarding suspensions.
The host of the trip was an Auburn fan, whose daughters attend or attended Auburn, and not connected to the University of Alabama in any way. Julio had a prior relationship with the guy from before due to he and his family owning a condo in Gulf Shores, and he has been reimbursed for the trip. No decisions have been made regarding suspensions.
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:44 pm to attheua
quote:
If this is true, I hope the booster involved is publicly shamed and then tarred and feathered. Start embarrassing these losers that harm our program.
You would think they would have gotten the message by now. Hell Logan Young was killed and the recent one buying players in Gasden was just disassociated and hushed up. If I was him, I would disappear very quickly if Bama gets in deep shite with boosters again right now.
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:47 pm to bmy
quote:
The host of the trip was an Auburn fan, whose daughters attend or attended Auburn, and not connected to the University of Alabama in any way. Julio had a prior relationship with the guy from before due to he and his family owning a condo in Gulf Shores, and he has been reimbursed for the trip.
Well now we know the bama spin on it. It does not have to be logical or make any sense so long as it absolves bama of any accountability.
What a joke.
Posted on 5/31/09 at 1:50 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
is there really no link in this entire fricking thread?
Page 10 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News