Started By
Message
Posted on 8/3/25 at 10:50 am to Saunson69
Some of the transfers in come from other SEC teams. So to really be accurate you would need adjust for transfers out.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 1:08 pm to WossNess
quote:
Excellent breakdown. Ppl just can't accept Texas good again. They blame NIL and money. Even if that was the case you still need good coaching.
Texas benefits from NIL because now we can pay for top recruiting classes instead of the bag dropping stuff that maybe 10 schools were very proficient at -- LSU, Oregon, Bama, Auburn, Clemson, Georgia, Jimbo Fisher's A&M, etc.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 1:25 pm to Saunson69
Nice breakdown. This will be Tennessee's first year having a roster with a blue chip ratio over 50% for the the first time since Fulmer was here. Which is both encouraging and pathetic mixed into one.
This post was edited on 8/3/25 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 8/3/25 at 5:22 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
I believe it was Mullen's 2019 class when 13/25 signed either never made it on to campus or were gone after 1 season.
Yep, captured on n “Florida - As the swamp burns” thread
This post was edited on 8/3/25 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 8/3/25 at 5:42 pm to captdalton
quote:Quality depth
It is interesting to see LSU at #5 after seeing LSU fans here, one in particular, claim that LSU’s problem the last 5 years has been lack of talent.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 6:00 pm to Saunson69
quote:
You can see how much NIL benefit programs such as Oregon and Texas. On their own standalone merit, they finished a lot lower than when they were able to buy players
Nah, not so much NIL, as Tom Herman's doing. He was moving the program in the wrong direction. Sarkisian comes in and recruiting improves. Matter of fact, Ewers went to tOSU because Herman was there eventhough Texas was Ewers dream school. Sarkisian got him back even while Ewers had big NIL at tOSU.
Popular
Back to top

0







