Favorite team:Georgia 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1156
Registered on:7/16/2018
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

how big of a sample size of winning do you need to exhibit before you can become a respected program?


I don’t think UGA was a respected program under Mark Richt. Tenn, won in 1998, then LSU, UF, Bama, and Auburn all won in the 2000’s I don’t think UGA was looked at as a peer or a respected program until Kirby won his first, and even then I think it took the second one for people to respect us.
quote:

Anyone with an entry level understanding of media would pull up Dawgnation and/or OnlineAthens and look for their latest headline on the story, and it would take all of 30 seconds to figure out.


Not sure if this response was directed to me or not. I have been refreshing several sources for UGA news throughout the day and have only seen one well know poster on another site (swiftyman) mention these charges being dropped referencing the scanner not working correctly …Hence trying to see if there was some outlet that had reported differently.
Not saying these charges wont be dropped or haven't been dropped, but I have only seen one source mention that and it was a poster on another fan website. I have not seen the charges have been dropped by any of the UGA pay sites, dawgnation, Athens Banner herald, etc.

If someone has a story stating this please let me know or drop the link
Not sure if you understand how the NCAA Graduation rates work.

"How the Cohort Works
Identify the Cohort: The process begins by identifying a group (cohort) of student-athletes who started college in a specific fall semester as first-time, full-time freshmen and received athletic aid at any point during their first year.
Track for Six Years: This specific group is followed for six years from their initial enrollment.
Calculate the Rate: The graduation rate is the percentage of students in that initial cohort who graduate from that institution within that six-year window. "

In addition it's almost impossible to get NCAA's data on a single cohort (year). They tend to do them in a group of four year cohorts.

When those numbers were put out it was kids that enrolled prior to Kirby ever getting there included in the 4 year cohorts.. The UGA 2013 class was nuts for attrition... The number will continue to go up once the Kirby cohorts are included in the 4 year sample which will be 6 years from 2016-2020 cohort which should be next year...So in other words these numbers are looking back almost 10 full years,.

feel free to look for yourself.
https://web3.ncaa.org/aprsearch/gsrsearch


Example: The latest data available 2024-2025

It shows the rate for men who entered as freshmen in 2018-19 and the four-class average, which includes those who entered as freshmen in 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19.
quote:

Which elite pass rushers are we keeping on the bench? It’s talent, not scheme.


I understand Kirby has a scheme he sticks to…Grubb is absolutely abusing our tendencies, including DB leverages and Simpson is executing the plan to perfection.


Schuman and Kirby better break some tendencies on defense second half. Not having an elite pass rusher due to NIL is showing. Simpson just keeps taking deep drops on pressure downs. We are being out schemed. They did the same thing to Lanning at Oregon. Man…I really miss Muschamp.
quote:

Keep in mind there may be MORE than 16 in the SEC then.


SEC grant of rights ends 2034, ACC (Idiots) ends 2036.

Yeah the last 4 schools I could see are UNC, UVA, Duke, and Kansas. Could also see ND over Duke or Kansas. Significantly improves the value of the conference for Men’s BB and actually dilutes the football schedules a little for the 8 NC contending teams (Big 6 +Tx and OU). All are members of the AAU and all but Duke are the states flagship universities. These 9 conference game schedules are going to be brutal…bring in 4 mid tier football programs to increase the win Pctg. While improving the BB product at the same time all while maintaining a contiguous regional footprint while also adding several large metro areas for raw viewership numbers. I know people think cord cutting is decreasing ESPN value and it is, but YoutubeTV, HULU, and DirectTV stream all pay similar carriage fees to ESPN like cable companies.

The Big 10 has like 5 competitive programs (OSU, UM, PennSt, Oregon, USC) compared to our 8 and the SEC is a significantly deeper league. Let the BiG take Clemson, FSU, and maybe Miami to try and keep up…I know the arguments for adding Clemson and FSU to the SEC and I respectfully disagree. Nope, don’t want. FSU had their chance.


What’s left of the big 12 and the ACC would essentially be relegated to the group of 5 level and the top 2 leagues would be all that was left. I could see a mandate to go to a 10 game conference e schedule and +1 from ether the BiG or what’s left of the ACC/Big 12.

re: Permanent opponents leaked

Posted by GruvenDawg on 9/22/25 at 12:10 pm to
]
quote:

Georgia gets the easiest three opponents as of right now. What a joke.

Are you serious? You’re trying to troll USC right? Look at your opponents, or LSU’s…He’ll look at Tennessee’s, that’s an abomination

re: Georgia last home loss 10/12/19

Posted by GruvenDawg on 9/22/25 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Isn't it another black out?


No, team will be in red shirts and silver britches.
quote:

And it needs to be the first conference game again. You guys ready for September in Columbia again?


Please move this game to mid October. It is SO DAMN HOT the 2nd weekend of September in Columbia.

re: Permanent opponents leaked

Posted by GruvenDawg on 9/22/25 at 10:20 am to
quote:

As a Georgia fan, I wanted Kentucky. Nobody wants to travel to away games in Columbia.



Just move this game from week 3 and it won't be so bad...2nd weekend of September is BRUTAL in Columbia...move it to 2nd weekend of October and it's nowhere near as bad. Also that allows us to move Auburn back to when it should be played in November.

re: Permanent opponents leaked

Posted by GruvenDawg on 9/22/25 at 10:07 am to
Big 6 (SEC NC contending teams). Traditionally every big 6 team played two other big 6 teams a year for better TV matchups.

Alabama
Auburn
Florida
Georgia
LSU
Tennessee


Big 6 playing big six every year with new rotation.

Alabama - Auburn, Tennessee
Auburn - Alabama, Georgia
Florida - Georgia, ? one???
Georgia - Auburn, Florida
LSU - ? None, seriously, NONE???
Tennessee - Alabama, ? one???

Others
Kentucky - Tennessee, Florida
USC - Florida, Georgia
Vanderbilt - Tennessee, Auburn


How in the absolute hell did Kentucky, USC and Vandy get harder schedules then Florida and Tennessee? I am not even going to discuss what is going on with LSU getting none, that's NUTS!!!! Why is there no Florida LSU? I understand you can't load up Auburn and Alabama with 3 of the big 6 , But at least give them one vs the big 6 and UF would at least qualified as a Big 6 matchup? Damn....lots of the big 6 games are gone...hopefully LSU fans lose it on the SEC office and they get back UF at the minimum.

For you other teams that are newer to the league. Win a NC while a member of the SEC and we will talk about updating the big 6...This is an old SEC conference discussion... Also shut your trap's with that absolute gift of a 3 game slate...you each play 1 NC title contending team instead of 2. Sankey kissing that arse apparently.
quote:

OU is 4-0 against Auburn. That’s not a rivalry, Auburn has another Daddy.



Get in line

quote:

Fans don’t play bama was going to send Bear packing if we didn’t Turning point around n 71


quote:

I’m referencing Dabo Swinney presser in case y’all no catch


quote:

Dumfuks .. bama was going to fire bear Bryant in 1971 if another poor season … fans weren’t playing .. fans are what have you done for me lately .. that’s what Clemson fans are saying to dabo and he’s whining about it saying look at my past record .. capiche dumfuks ?


Not sure why you are calling people’s response to your thread “dumfuks”. Either your grammar is terrible or you type like a 12 year old girl. Maybe next time try to put a coherent post together instead of spamming the board with this illiterate trash grammar. Maybe then people wouldn’t respond calling out your posts.

(•¯?•¯ )

Yep, nice play design there.

Here’s to a good game in Sanford stadium and no injuries by either team.
:cheers:
quote:

Good, no Metchie and Williams excuses then


I guess the hook was too shiny for some
quote:

Since 1960, name one other SEC school who’s five worst coaches all had winning records, all had at least one 10 win season, and all finished at least one season ranked in the top 12. I will wait.


UGA meets this requirement starting in 1964 with the arrival of Vince Dooley. Fun fact, from 1964-2025 UGA had 5 head coaches and until recently all of them still call Athens home (RIP Coach Dooley).

My opinion. Add UVA, UNC, Kansas, and Duke or Notre Dame (Notre Dame is not joining the SEC, bad cultural fits so take Duke)

We already have 8 national title contending teams in football and with the playoffs probably 2 more schools that could realistically win one. The Big 10 desperately needs more teams that compete for football championships, let them take FSU, Clemson, Miami. They can deal with the travel expenses and pain in the arse fan bases.

We should go ahead and get to 20, take schools that are respectable in football, have very sound athletic departments, but add another dimension to the conference. All of the schools listed above are national powers in basketball and are state flagship Universities (other than Duke) in addition to being AAU members. Regionalization for numbers do still matter about the eyeballs available. ESPN doesn’t just make deals with cable providers, they also get to make deals with YouTubeTV, Hulu, Fubu, DirecTV etc. Adding the NC, DMV markets are still large, and the KC market isn’t something to sneeze at. Those additional markets give more bargaining power as those are considered name brand programs for basketball outside of the regional addition in football. Adding value to secondary programming like basketball just increases a conferences value overall while not necessarily impacting football numbers.

Rising tides lifts all boats. SEC gets high academic institutions expanding its regionalized viewing segment and improves basketball. These teams would lessen the impact of a football 9 game schedule by diluting the product a little (won’t be quite as tough to go 9-3,10-2). Those teams also have the ability to allow regionalized pods for some permanent opponents with rivalries already existing (UNC, Duke, UVA) and I know Kansas has some existing rivalries with Missouri and Oklahoma.
quote:

I believe it was Mullen's 2019 class when 13/25 signed either never made it on to campus or were gone after 1 season.


Yep, captured on n “Florida - As the swamp burns” thread

re: Terrible holding non call

Posted by GruvenDawg on 1/2/25 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Clear holding!


Are dudes are held all the time. It has to be egregious for it to get called for us

re: If Georgia loses today

Posted by GruvenDawg on 1/2/25 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

A) blame Texas for breaking Beck?
B) blame the postponement and say they would have won if played yesterday
C) blame the refs
D) blame the SEC for making them play a meaningless game where Texas broke their QB in half
E) blame college football for the seeding


Scared huh? We ain’t losing today. Keep up your end of the bargain and you will get a third shot at us