Started By
Message
re: Ranking the Likelihood of Permanent Opponent Rivalries
Posted on 9/11/25 at 7:27 pm to southernboisb
Posted on 9/11/25 at 7:27 pm to southernboisb
What does Missouri have to do with anything, that was pre-existing. I seriously don't understand why they are being mentioned.
Yes, Missouri stays in the East. Nothing is done with TAM.
Yes, Missouri stays in the East. Nothing is done with TAM.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 7:35 pm to southernboisb
quote:
Once again…geography.
I can understand geography. However it is 775 miles from Columbia, MO to Austin, TX and only 675 miles from Columbia to Atlanta.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 7:37 pm to IvIerlot
You said you want East/West again.
If you look GEOGRAPHICALLY, TA&M & Mizz. ARE WESTERN LOCATED schools for the SEC.
Therefore, if you're going to add TX & OK, that creates the debate of 2 WESTERN LOCATED schools for the SEC & which group they should be placed in (being both are located FURTHER WEST than Mizz.).
If you look GEOGRAPHICALLY, TA&M & Mizz. ARE WESTERN LOCATED schools for the SEC.
Therefore, if you're going to add TX & OK, that creates the debate of 2 WESTERN LOCATED schools for the SEC & which group they should be placed in (being both are located FURTHER WEST than Mizz.).
Posted on 9/11/25 at 7:42 pm to AUTiger789
True but Ole Miss, Arkansas, and Mississippi State were pretty bad during a lot of those years
Posted on 9/11/25 at 7:43 pm to southernboisb
East west is ghey. And as a founding member we will not be put with all the new schools only.
North south gives both division the same number of new comers
North south gives both division the same number of new comers
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 9/11/25 at 8:05 pm to southernboisb
I see. I don't care about MZ or TAM though, that problem already existed, and TX is both farther East and Farther West than Oklahoma.
Should just add one to one side, and the other to the other side, make'em perms and be home for dinner.
Should just add one to one side, and the other to the other side, make'em perms and be home for dinner.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:47 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
Auburn- Florida won’t get assigned Auburn because there is no way they are going to make AU play Alabama, Georgia, and Florida every single season. Too difficult.
And yet we used to play all three plus Tennessee every single season.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 11:26 pm to AUTiger789
Texas A&M are not an LSU rival....this needs to be said over and over.
LSU's rivals are Ole Miss, MS State and then maybe Bama, FL or Ark.
LSU's rivals are Ole Miss, MS State and then maybe Bama, FL or Ark.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 9:09 am to AUTiger789
quote:
8. LSU vs Ole Miss
this is 100% to play annually
Posted on 9/12/25 at 10:57 am to SouthernInsanity
That would be wild lol, but I’m thinking it will be Auburn Tennessee and State
Posted on 9/12/25 at 10:59 am to hansenthered1
I get what you saying but I always viewed them as a rival, man their games be intense
Posted on 9/12/25 at 11:42 am to AUTiger789
LSU vs ole piss is 100% for the older boomer generation…
I would prefer Auburn, Alabama and Florida for the hate factor
I would prefer Auburn, Alabama and Florida for the hate factor
This post was edited on 9/12/25 at 11:44 am
Popular
Back to top


1






