Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Pulling back the curtain on Baseball RPI

Posted on 5/11/26 at 10:26 am
Posted by AU6X
Member since Sep 2019
153 posts
Posted on 5/11/26 at 10:26 am
Baseball RPI is not the be-all-end-all (it can be gamed by playing chump games on the road or at neutral sites), but conf schedules somewhat flatten that out.

Current Top 8 of RPI is 1 UCLA, 2 Tech, 3 AU, 4 UTx, 5 UNC, 6 bammer, 7 FSU * 8USCw. Of those 8, AU has the most Q1 games (25), has 4 more scheduled this week, and will likely play 1+ more in Hoover (and Arky is presently RPI 26 – move up 1 spot and that’s 3 more Q1 games). In descending, order the Q1 games played for the remaining top 8 RPI team: bammer (23), UTx (22), Tech (21), FSU (18), UNC (14) & UCLA and USCw way down the list with 10 and 8. I just don’t see how in the world AU doesn’t finish w the top strength of schedule (Current Top 10 overall SOS is AU, UF, Ole Miss, bammer, FSU, UTx, okie, MSU, Wake, VaTech.)

A few more general interesting RPI notes. SEC has 9 of the Top 20 RPI teams this week. UGA is next to lowest in that group at 14. Only 4 teams have 0 Q3/4 losses: AU, bully, OMiss & Okie. SEC reg season champ UGA has 4 Q3/4 losses. aTm only has 2 Q2 games this season – none in the SEC (2 Q3 series in conf – home vs Vandy & away at Mizzou). Every SEC team that played Mizzou and SoCar at home has a Q4 conference series (AU played Mizzou in CoMo, thankfully). Bammer dropped 1 spot in RPI this week after losing at Troy but sweeping SoCar on the road.

USCw is #8 RPI, and that makes no sense. They are 0-8 in Q1 games, overall SOS is 40, NCSOS is 96, & KPI and DSR are both #21. It shouldn’t host (much less be in contention for a national seed), but bet the Committee gives either it or Nebraska (RPI 15) a host spot over a more deserving SEC team. (For instance, OMiss RPI is 13, DSR is 16, and KPI is 13. They only host if they take 2/3 in Tuscaloosa, and that will probably just knock another SEC team out of hosting.)

AU vs UCLA RPI comparison is very interesting. Since 4/1, AU has played 1 Q3 (N Samford) and 1 Q4 (H vs Ala St). In that same window, UCLA has played 6 Q3 games (both B10 series) and 5 Q4 games. UCLA’s series at Mich St (RPI # 123) would have been Q4 if played in LA. AU has 4 Away Q1 conf series – uat, aTm, UF, and bully. All 4 would have still been Q1 games if Auburn had played them at home. UCLA has 2 B10 away series (Iowa and OSU) that would be Q3 if played at home and 1(Rutgers) that would be Q4 if played at home. UCLA may be the best team in the country, but are they battle tested?
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
90262 posts
Posted on 5/11/26 at 10:33 am to
RPI is dumber than shite. 25% is your win percentage, but another 25% is your opponent's opponent's winning percentage?

So UGA's resume, which includes wrapping up the SEC title with 4 games remaining, has an equal amount of weight given to our overall wins as it does for Milwaukee's putrid record (since we played LSU and LSU played milwaukee run ruling them twice). WTF sense does that make?
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
25793 posts
Posted on 5/11/26 at 10:35 am to
That is just hard to read, spacing matters. Even the sloppy example here is more readable.


RPI isn’t everything (it can be gamed with weak road/neutral games), but conference schedules usually smooth that out.
Current RPI Top 8

UCLA
Texas Tech
Auburn
Texas
UNC
Alabama
FSU
USC

Q1 Games (Top 8)

Auburn: 25 (4 more this week + likely 1+ in Hoover; Arkansas at #26 = potential for 3 more Q1)
Alabama: 23
Texas: 22
Texas Tech: 21
FSU: 18
UNC: 14
UCLA: 10
USC: 8

Hard to see Auburn not finishing with the #1 SOS.
Top 10 SOS right now:
Auburn, Florida, Ole Miss, Alabama, FSU, Texas, Oklahoma, Mississippi State, Wake, Virginia Tech

Other RPI Notes


SEC has 9 of top 20 (UGA lowest at #14)


Only 4 teams with ZERO Q3/Q4 losses: Auburn, Mississippi St, Ole Miss, Oklahoma


UGA (SEC champ) has 4 Q3/Q4 losses


Texas A&M:

Only 2 Q2 games all year
NONE in SEC play
Played 2 Q3 conference series (Vandy at home, Mizzou on road)



Playing Mizzou or South Carolina at home = Q4 series

Auburn avoided that by playing at Mizzou



Alabama dropped a spot after:

Losing at Troy
Sweeping South Carolina on road




USC at #8 makes no sense

0–8 in Q1
SOS #40
Non-con SOS #96
KPI #21 / DSR #21

Shouldn’t host, but committee will probably give USC or Nebraska (#15 RPI) a host over an SEC team.
Example:

Ole Miss: RPI 13 / KPI 13 / DSR 16
Likely needs 2/3 at Alabama just to host (and that could knock out another SEC team)


Auburn vs UCLA (since April 1)
Auburn

1 Q3 (neutral Samford)
1 Q4 (Alabama State)

UCLA


6 Q3 (B1G series)


5 Q4


UCLA @ Michigan State (#123) would’ve been Q4 if played at home



Road Strength
Auburn

4 away Q1 series: Alabama, A&M, Florida, Mississippi St
All still Q1 even if played at home

UCLA

@ Iowa, @ Ohio State ? Q3 if at home
@ Rutgers ? Q4 if at home


Bottom line:
UCLA might be the best team in the country, but Auburn is far more battle-tested.
Posted by AU6X
Member since Sep 2019
153 posts
Posted on 5/11/26 at 10:45 am to
Thanks, I guess.
Posted by AU6X
Member since Sep 2019
153 posts
Posted on 5/11/26 at 10:53 am to
UGA certainly could have improved its RPI stock with its pre-con schedule — 1 whole game away from Athens, and that was at Kennesaw.

But RPI also got screwed by the SEC schedule — LSU, SoCar and Mizzou all at home. Not your fault those teams suck, but you should also at least acknowledge (1) having the good luck of them being on your schedule and (2) playing them at home made for a very easy 9 of your 21 wins.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
90262 posts
Posted on 5/11/26 at 11:07 am to
quote:

But RPI also got screwed by the SEC schedule — LSU, SoCar and Mizzou all at home. Not your fault those teams suck, but you should also at least acknowledge (1) having the good luck of them being on your schedule and (2) playing them at home made for a very easy 9 of your 21 wins.


we also played and won road series at aTm, at MSU, at Arkansas, and at Ole miss. I won't ever apologize for any kind of good fortune regarding an SEC schedule. In the preseason LSU was predicted to win the league. According to the coaches in preseason UGA was set to play 6 of the top 7 teams in the league. It didn't work out that way in real life obviously, but I'm not going to hem and haw and chalk up our great fortune to the fact that we got to play mizzou and SC this year.

My overall point stands regardless of how it applies to UGA. There is absolutely zero logic or rataional sense in having your record, and your OPPONENT'S OPPONENT'S records count in the exact same manner. Both of which combined only equaling the same weight as your opponent's record. It's ridiculous.

I understand the genreal theme of "well how hard was your copmetition" and wanting to come up wtih a way to account for it, but that's waht SOS is for.

Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
48979 posts
Posted on 5/11/26 at 11:25 am to
If you can cancel midweek games against shitty teams to prevent your RPI from dropping (and by extension affect the RPI of others) it’s a stupid metric to live and die by.

Example: UNC cancelled their game with Queens College of Charlotte last week entirely to spare them the RPI hit and, in the process, hurting UGAs RPI since we played Queens College earlier in the year.

Too, assigning equal weight to our loss vs Western Carolina on a Tuesday early in the year as our loss at Ole Miss on Friday two weeks ago is dumb for all the reasons we can reasonably understand.

Georgia should do more in its non conference to prevent this being a thing but also… we’re 21-6 vs an SEC schedule. The RPI die hards arguing against us on reddit and Twitter are knowingly arguing in bad faith just to be pedantic.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter