Started By
Message

re: Position by position breakdown.

Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:16 am to
Posted by UsingUpAllTheLetters
Stuck in Transfer Portal
Member since Aug 2011
8908 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:16 am to
You're putting way too much thought into this.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:18 am to
quote:

:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: calling the honey badger a liability in coverage. he might not be a normal shutdown corner but he is far from a liability.


That mongoloid also posted that LSU runs a 3-4. Bama fans continue to impress...
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:47 am to
this thread and the bol thread have a nice collection of the retard bama fans in it.
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23289 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:49 am to
The only position Bama has an advantage is LB.

Everything else is either even or advantage LSU.

I want to know how Bama has improved. LSU has more depth in the secondary, the emergence of Hilliard, changes at LB, and Jefferson taking over the offense since the last game. These things have actually improved LSU as a team.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22231 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

So, you're saying your QB is garbage? Yet you give Bama the edge in QB? So, he can't get the ball to open receivers against a CB who is a liability in coverage AND our QB's have more TD's and less int's than yours but you still give your qb's the advantage? Delusion and homerism at it's finest...



TM7 is a liability in coverage and AJ didn't play well. You can jump to whatever conclusions you want from that.
Posted by LSU042
Member since Jan 2008
125 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:39 pm to
QB: Bama - based off of the last game. 16-29 for 199 yards vrs 6-10 for 67 yards is pretty evident. In LSU's defense JJ has taken over now and things are very different. Bama has only a very slight edge.

RB: LSU. LSU had 148 yards rushing total and in the 4th quarter and OT was knocking Bama off the line.

OL: LSU. See RB comments, they kind of go together IMO.

WR: Push. We have the better core on paper, but Bama recievers had the better game.

TE: Push - Bama's TE had 1 catch for 8 yards. LSU TE's had 3 catches for 17 yards. Maybe we should be argueing over which TE's block better.

DL: LSU - LSU's DL took over Bama's OL in the end when it counted the most. While LSU's O moved foward, Bama's O moved backwards. Thats about as simple as it gets.

LB: Bama - even if LSU LB's would have had a better game (which they didn't) I would still give this one to Bama against any team in the nation. Hell, we could probably mix some teams together and still not match that group.

DB: push - Lets be honest. Neither one of these groups are going to be severly challenged in this game to cover the WR's. They will on the other hand, better be ready to tackle. If either team does decide to try and attempt to go to the air, which neither team likes to do, both these groups are more than capable.

ST: LSU - which was made very evident in the first game. If Bama can't get close enough to kick respectable FG's this time maybe they might find the wisdom to punt the ball in a defensive battle.

Coaching: Push - If Saban coaches like he did the last game I assure LSU will win. If he pulls his head out of his but this will be a instant classic.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22231 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

That mongoloid also posted that LSU runs a 3-4.


Obvious typo if you read the rest of the sentence.
Posted by HottyToddy7
Member since Sep 2010
15247 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:42 pm to
Everything I have seen in this thread is moot. QB vs QB is a pointless way to look at a football game. Both defenses are going to dominate the other's offense. The game will come down to penalties, turnovers and who can avoid blown coverages.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52837 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

TM7 is a liability in coverage


incorrect. By a bunch
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:47 pm to
idk man it seems legit too me that the best defensive player in football is a liability in coverage
Posted by JonTheTigerFan
Central, LA
Member since Nov 2003
6939 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

TM7 is a liability in coverage and AJ didn't play well. You can jump to whatever conclusions you want from that.


When one set of qb's has more TD's and less int's against better competition than another set, I don't have to jump to conclusions. Those are facts. TDs and FGs win games. Yards let losers claim moral stat victories.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22231 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

idk man it seems legit too me that the best defensive player in football is a liability in coverage



I know you guys LOOOOVE him, and rightfully so, but he's not a great coverage corner. I'm sure he'll get better in time, but right now, he's not.

Do you REALLY think TM7 is the best defensive player in football? Seriously? He's had a lot of high-profile, big plays, but you have two or three CB's on your own team that I'd rather have than him.
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
24785 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:51 pm to
Someone explain Bama fans calling DBs a push to maybe a slight advantage to LSU when LSU has the Thorpe and Bednarik winners in the secondary?
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52837 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

idk man it seems legit too me that the best defensive player in football is a liability in coverage


1st Team AP All-American CBs often are, no?
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:51 pm to
even if he isn't great which we disagree on that doesn't make him a liability. a liability is someone like phelon jones or carnell hatcher, the best player in football isn't a liability.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22231 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

When one set of qb's has more TD's and less int's against better competition than another set, I don't have to jump to conclusions. Those are facts. TDs and FGs win games. Yards let losers claim moral stat victories.



Let's just agree to disagree. What you believe really doesn't matter to me.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:52 pm to
PP7 was a liability last year
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52837 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

but you have two or three CB's on your own team that I'd rather have than him.



And YOU are better at determining this than Ron Cooper and John Chavis?

TM07 is the starting CB in base defense. Obviously THOSE guys think he is very good and worthy of being a starter.
This post was edited on 12/21/11 at 12:54 pm
Posted by DennyChimes10
21-0
Member since Mar 2010
1913 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

No team will ever have a coaching advantage against a Les Miles - led LSU team in a bowl game.


Oh.
My.
God.

I can't wait for that arse clown to choke on another time management situation. My, how the LSU fans forget so quickly.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:58 pm to
5-1 in bowl games and none of our wins have been close at all.

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter