Started By
Message
re: Pollack ran his mouth to Saban at NC title game, gets fired 6 months later. Coincidence?
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:23 pm to DawgCountry
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:23 pm to DawgCountry
How in the hell did this become a 17 page thread ?
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/55851781/saban_shreds_gif.0.gif)
0
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:59 pm to djsdawg
quote:
These sites know the reputation of bama fans, and they wrote articles for the simple minded such as yourself. They don’t validate your excuses, but rather they mock them.
Perhaps they watched the games and saw who was hurt.
quote:
Unnecessary and irrelevant.
When you disagree with your own insiders/media people you know you're in denail.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:59 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Read your headline. "Healthiest" tells you all you need to know. Not healthy. Healthiest.
Why would they write an article about health in the first place if the team wasn't healthy by football standards? It would make no sense
quote:
Pick them out. But we both know that Georgia rotates players a ton. That's why when our WR room was decimated our backups were ready to go. It's also why Alabama's backup WRs were dropping passes all over the place. Saban simply did not have your team ready.
Imagine. Years and years of dominating recruiting and got beat because of two injuries. TWO. That's just sad.
Now you're using rotation to argue. It wasn't TWO. It was top 3 corners, both wrs, starting center, starting OLB, and the best DL going out in the 4th when Georgia had the most success...not counting the starting punt returner.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 4:59 pm to tndawg
quote:
There was this article, which turned out to be highly prescient:
Were they there a month earlier when Bama won easily?
Posted on 7/6/23 at 5:03 pm to Knowshon5Dolla
quote:
Can you restructure this sentence so that it resembles English? Perhaps then I can properly respond.
You're suing the score of the game vs why the score happened.
quote:
Using your logic. Most of us have stated a solid case explaining why your logic is horribly flawed.
quote:
Correct. Most of the people who reported on the game properly addressed it as a 33-18 victory by the University of Georgia. Alabama's injuries were no more than a footnote.
quote:
I'm biased. You're biased. We're all biased. Florida fans are on here refuting your points. LSU fans as well.
They didn't refute anything. They got refuted.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 5:05 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
It takes a special kind of retard to melt about a game where you got your arse kicked 18 months ago because muh injuries.
What does it say when someone responds 18 months later...it says he felt it was worth the effort.
This post was edited on 7/6/23 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 7/6/23 at 5:51 pm to Alabama CrimsonTider
If you’re going to just make stuff up use the same criteria at least. UGA has 3 AP championships, AL has 12, UGA has 4 consensus, AL has less than 18.
The idea that Alabama is an international brand is laughable. Most of the people in the world couldn’t name a city in Alabama.
Also the NCAA has never awarded 1 NC in D1A college football so it’s utterly immaterial what they think.
And for the record Kirby has another 5 years to win his 3rd National Championship before the age that Saban won his first.
The idea that Alabama is an international brand is laughable. Most of the people in the world couldn’t name a city in Alabama.
Also the NCAA has never awarded 1 NC in D1A college football so it’s utterly immaterial what they think.
And for the record Kirby has another 5 years to win his 3rd National Championship before the age that Saban won his first.
This post was edited on 7/6/23 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 7/6/23 at 6:22 pm to mbogo
Jesus, you are a sad little man.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 6:27 pm to mbogo
quote:
Perhaps they watched the games and saw who was hurt.
These kind of writers are catering to the smallest of brains.
It was a one sided article to pad the egos of the losers, which doesn’t tell more than half the story, therefore it doesn’t validate anything you have said.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 6:34 pm to mbogo
quote:
Why would they write an article about health in the first place if the team wasn't healthy by football standards? It would make no sense
The only reason to write about the health of a is because uga dealt with a lot of injuries in 2021.
Most teams wouldn’t overcome what uga did in 2021. No way bama would have. Y’all clearly don’t have elite depth.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 6:58 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The only reason to write about the health of a is because uga dealt with a lot of injuries in 2021.
If they were decimated it would be nonsensical.
quote:
Most teams wouldn’t overcome what uga did in 2021. No way bama would have. Y’all clearly don’t have elite depth.
Depth is a different topic. You're changing the subject. If you can find anything about Georgia's being decimated you let me know.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 7:01 pm to djsdawg
quote:
These kind of writers are catering to the smallest of brains.
They're Georgia writers. I'm sure your fellow will be happy you described them that way.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 7:24 pm to mbogo
quote:
Depth is a different topic. You're changing the subject. If you can find anything about Georgia's being decimated you let me know.
They are intertwined topics:
When your starting qb gets hurt, the depth goes in.
When your best WR gets hurt and has to rehab, the depth goes in.
When your best pass rushing Anderson gets removed for a rape accusation, the depth goes in.
Bama would have been ruined if they had to deal with that, which is why you say none of them count. Backwards arse logic you use.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 7:25 pm to mbogo
quote:
they were decimated it would be nonsensical.
We were decimated in the December game. Bama wasn’t.
It was all equal in the rematch. Uga had better depth.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 7:28 pm to mbogo
quote:
They're Georgia writers. I'm sure your fellow will be happy you described them that way.
I am talking about your no names.
As for the uga guy, whoever he is, You still aren’t getting it because you still don’t understand the concept of mutual exclusivity.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 8:21 pm to mbogo
quote:
Why would they write an article about health in the first place if the team wasn't healthy by football standards? It would make no sense
I'm sure you have a headline about Alabama's health. But "it makes no sense!" Do you think before you hit the post button, or do you just hit random keys and hope nobody with a critical brain reads them? quote:
Now you're using rotation to argue. It wasn't TWO. It was top 3 corners, both wrs, starting center, starting OLB, and the best DL going out in the 4th when Georgia had the most success...not counting the starting punt returner.
I used to respect Alabama fans.
Now you seem to be pathetic.Posted on 7/6/23 at 10:52 pm to DawgsLife
Yeah, but if Bama could field a team of mini-Saban’s
Posted on 7/6/23 at 11:23 pm to djsdawg
quote:
They are intertwined topics:
They are different topics. That's why the topic in many places was Bama injuries.
quote:
Bama would have been ruined if they had to deal with that, which is why you say none of them count. Backwards arse logic you use.
When your starting QB gets hurt and your team is better off it's a lucky break that he got hurt. You're trying to use something fortunate for Georgia as a bad thing. Where is JTD these days?
This post was edited on 7/6/23 at 11:40 pm
Posted on 7/6/23 at 11:28 pm to djsdawg
quote:
I am talking about your no names.
Give me a no name, or anyone, that stated Georgie was decimated.
quote:
As for the uga guy, whoever he is, You still aren’t getting it because you still don’t understand the concept of mutual exclusivity.
I understand that a Geprgia writer doesn't write about Georgia's health and injury luck for a team that is decimated.
Posted on 7/6/23 at 11:37 pm to mbogo
quote:
Give me a no name, or anyone, that stated Georgie was decimated.
You keep on asking the same stupid question. How many times does it need to be explained to you?
Page 17 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News