Started By
Message

re: Patrick Peterson and the no-call interception . . .

Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:35 am to
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76476 posts
Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:35 am to
quote:

The biggest LOL is LSU fans convincing themselves that even if the INT had been called they somehow automatically win.

Oh, I agree.

But they should have been given the chance.

I mean it was an INT, the wrong call was made. But life goes on.

No SEC game was ever called so poorly, as the 06 LSU/Auburn game. . .even taking away the call at the end.

Here's a tidefans thread on the subject
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17745 posts
Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:39 am to
Patrick Peterson?

OP is the very definition of "triggered"

Here's some tough love, OP



Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
22091 posts
Posted on 4/4/19 at 10:16 am to
Dang this board has gone through a lot of cast changes. I mean, a lot. Many of you (not all) have failed to comprehend and see the value of a simple, meandering hit piece. Amazing.

So, with that being stated, I think I’ve finally done it . . .

I’ve actually gone above and beyond the Master level on this board. Actually, I think I’ve far exceeded it, and have now acheived a Ph. D in Esteemed Triggering & Advanced Rustling (as in Jimmies for all the oldies here).

My job is done.

Dr. Bham4Tide
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93694 posts
Posted on 4/4/19 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Do you even Saints - Rams, bro?

That was a non-call and while egregious as it gets, the PP7 call actually went to review and he exceeded the necessary components to complete a catch in college football. That would have been a catch in the NFL.
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter