Started By
Message
re: Patrick Peterson and the no-call interception . . .
Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:35 am to PEPE
Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:35 am to PEPE
quote:Oh, I agree.
The biggest LOL is LSU fans convincing themselves that even if the INT had been called they somehow automatically win.
But they should have been given the chance.
I mean it was an INT, the wrong call was made. But life goes on.
No SEC game was ever called so poorly, as the 06 LSU/Auburn game. . .even taking away the call at the end.
Here's a tidefans thread on the subject
0
Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:39 am to Bham4Tide
Patrick Peterson? 
OP is the very definition of "triggered"
Here's some tough love, OP
OP is the very definition of "triggered"
Here's some tough love, OP
Posted on 4/4/19 at 10:16 am to Bham4Tide
Dang this board has gone through a lot of cast changes. I mean, a lot. Many of you (not all) have failed to comprehend and see the value of a simple, meandering hit piece. Amazing.
So, with that being stated, I think I’ve finally done it . . .
I’ve actually gone above and beyond the Master level on this board. Actually, I think I’ve far exceeded it, and have now acheived a Ph. D in Esteemed Triggering & Advanced Rustling (as in Jimmies for all the oldies here).
My job is done.
Dr. Bham4Tide
So, with that being stated, I think I’ve finally done it . . .
I’ve actually gone above and beyond the Master level on this board. Actually, I think I’ve far exceeded it, and have now acheived a Ph. D in Esteemed Triggering & Advanced Rustling (as in Jimmies for all the oldies here).
My job is done.
Dr. Bham4Tide
Posted on 4/4/19 at 10:23 am to NashvilleTiger09
quote:
Do you even Saints - Rams, bro?
That was a non-call and while egregious as it gets, the PP7 call actually went to review and he exceeded the necessary components to complete a catch in college football. That would have been a catch in the NFL.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News